George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Excellent Slug you say there are lots of peer reviewed studies that have stood up to scrutiny.
Just post a link to one on here and prove to everyone that you are not the most unintelligent poster on here.
Or don't post one and prove that you are the most unintelligent poster.
DBW,
one would think that a big entity talking to the government about such permissions would speed things up compared to solg doing the same.
So may be we are in a situation where in serious interest is shown to the asset and the guys are just getting themselves busy...Hope im wrong cause it is very annoying all this stuff.
There are loads of “peer reviewed” papers showing climate change isn’t man made, just as there were loads of peer reviewed papers showing covid wasn’t deadly and masks didn’t prevent spread. You just choose not to use them
If you’re convinced it’s the presence of man on the planet that is killing it then surely the best solution is depopulation? That’s what your cronies Gates and the WEF want after all.
Why not lead the way? Pop yourself in a biodegradable body bag and a few thousand years you’ll have rotted to carbon and will be of some use to someone finally.
Just as with covid, you cannot grasp that climate measures are not about being “for our own good”, they are tools to gain totalitarian control over a populace
Useful idiots like you are enabling them to do just that
Medi exactly
Obtaining permission for the pipeline and takings site etc will make the whole project more attractive and add value,
What are we doing here ? Putting everything in place to sell the thing for as much as possible
Quady this board really isn't the place for your extreme eco conspiracy theories.
Off topic at the very least and dangerous, misleading and hysterical at the most. I want to read about Solg on here, not whatever childish nonsense you've been fed by the Guardian or other globalist New World Order channels.
Those potential big interested firms know how to route a pipeline under rails, design water/power systems...and they know how to do that better than Solg.
So what are we doing here?
Slug let me make this simple for even the most unintelligent poster on here.
The Man made part cannot be absorbed as much as it's released.
If we had the CO2 levels we had 800,000 years ago today.
We would all be dead.
As not only can the current amounts not be dealt with, but we would have gone past the tipping point thousands of years ago.
We would be like Venus.
Only a complete idiot would say ah but we had those levels 800,000 years ago and we are not like Venus.
That is completely missing the point as we hadn't been burning fossil fuels and a population of 8 billion 800,000 years ago.
That show's you haven't got a clue.
Show people just one peer reviewed study that shows climate change is not happening.
And that human activity is not responsible.
You cannot because you are a fool.
You believe fools and so convict yourself of being one.
And then what ?
Months working out a new plan forward.
It seems Ecuador want/need this mine and (slowly) all the pieces are being put in place without spaffing loads of cash on more drilling that never seems to add value . It’s not as fast as I’d hoped but I actually think it’s pretty smart.
We just have to hope that, when the time comes, there is more than one interested party….. I think there’ll be plenty.
Mike Henry.....or Mark Bristow...
And who would you have in his place ?
Another Darryl?
You cant come in with all the bluster about non-performance at corporate level over a long period of time was i believe how Scott put it, and then deliver the current performance that he has. He is gone come AGM time, if he is held to the standards of his own words.
Linked In states that SOLG only have two people in London, for a primary London listed share...
I expect the Institutional shareholders are unimpressed, with no regular 'roadshows' in London (or Toronto; only 2 people listed there as well...)
And the major holdings page is headed "Jul 19 2023" but the hoildings are stated as:
"Last updated 15 December 2022"
Utterly b****y incompetent...what do he and his charming assistant do all day?
Mind you the CFO is only part time...
I think you've multiplied by 1.238 instead of dividing...
Am I missing something Fort...?
$28 million divided by 157, 141,000 = c17.83 cents; divided by 1.238 = 14.4p...approximately the SOLG SP at the time of presentation...
All error checks welcome...
DBW... yes but as I said... interested to know how Scott arrives at $28m for the CGP shares when actual value or net proceeds will be determined by the price they place or sell them.
Overall, I was fairly happy with the presentation but did chuckle at the pondering over Porvenir asset. Seriously... Scott.. it's plain and clar to all involved that Porvenir is actually the best asset to take forwards if doing a small mine / low capex plan. There's plenty of infrastructure down in the South and the chinese are already keen on it. I suspect he's playing this down for a reason and that reason is that it will likely go to chinese as a freebie if or when they announce a deal on Alpala.
They are effectively taking a tier 1 mine asset and mining it like a 3m resources mine. Well... you've got one of those already Scott... it's called Porvenir.
Should think most won’t be voting for Scott
It’s not enough progress for me for the money spent.
If we’re on cars and maintenance then there are still too many Ecuadorean bum scratchers on the payroll.
I won’t be voting for Scott unless something changes very soon
Morning Fort
Plenty of positives to take away from yesterday's presentation
I guess we'll know more about the up to date cash position next week but it didn't appear to be of any particular concern especially seeing as we have $28mn worth of stock we could sell if we either needed or wanted to.
There were the usual positive slants to take away ..... both candidates being pro resource development, plenty of interest both in our outside tenements as well as Cascabel.
Rather than doing nothing I think they are simply spending "our" money wisely ..... working on the finalization of the exploitation agreement (due this year) , permits for exploration declines (due this year) and importantly the revised investment protection agreement "again we think we'll have that signed by the end of the year".
Added to all this the revised PFS (3) due out Q1 (hopefully) should show a massively shortened time frame to development from the previously touted 6 years and a greatly reduced upfront cost.
Though the sorting of pipeline routes and tailings sites may not be very "sexy" it's all vital work that adds to the derisking of the project.
Finally though we are not drilling (or spending on drilling) at the moment we appear to be getting one of our Northern licenses "drill ready" ......... overall happy with what Scott had to say and will wait to see what unfolds.
DBW
I should add that I’m very keen we get this sold before the world wakes up and sees the hoax for what it is
At which point we become a gold asset again with the copper as a bonus
You’re right, I can’t tell the difference between man made and natural co2, that’s because there isn’t a difference.
Natural amounts ebb and flow (hence 6x the amount 800,000 years ago) so the tiny tiny amount that is man made is utterly irrelevant
The planet is once again greening as nature adapts like it always does. Why don’t we encourage everybody to plant trees and shrubs instead of feeezing themselves to death or giving up their cars?
Why don’t we say no to a million immigrants per year and instead of digging up woodland and greenery to build more houses we plant trees instead?
You seem to be advocating depopulation? Lead the way old chap
A good debate on climate change: joe rogan candace owens debate climate
Also many up-to-date debates by George Monbiot .
Regarding solgold. Great presentation by Scott he is doing everything right. Someone will come forward sooner or later
Lots of greenlines copperpot. The key is to use the filter and then there is zero disruption.
FWIIW, I thought presentation was pretty good considering he was unable to say anything that would be market sensitive as that requires an RNS before hand. So not surprising to see him tip toeing a bit around some points. What can he say??? What can't he say??? Not easy when SOLG are clearly in discussions with multiple parties and all are on NDA's.
The key to this presentation was to get the message out there that one of the world's finest Tier 1 discoveries is in derisking mode and getting better with every derisking event that happens. I suspect the message that a smaller scale phased approach will please some out there that were previously not in the running due to teh capex of $3bln being out of their pocket depth. So get the phased approach to $1bln to $1.5bln range and you suddenly get a whole load more interested parties.
The Time schedule of 3.30pm GMT to Denver US time not ideal as that's breakfast territory. I think he was a bit miffed at that but sure he realised that it was the global audience watching (millions) that mattered most rather than those in the room!
I think he'll be delivering an exciting exploration plan for the regionals soon as without that... the AGM is going to feel like a spagetti western. He needs a rabbit out of the hat and I reckon he has a few he can pull out.
This is why Slug you remain the most unintelligent poster on this forum.
You cannot even understand the difference.
800,000 year's ago the planet was warmer but could absorb all the CO2 because we had plant life and oceans.
Also as plant life rotted this over time became a carbon sink.
Today we know them as fossil fuels.
So today the huge carbon sink is not here, so back in 1800 we had 280 parts per million.
But human activity today has grown it to over 400 parts per million.
You are a true idiot by trying to argue the percentage.
Even some of the true idiots understand that has nothing to do with the problem.
We cannot sink the excess CO2 because what we create doesn't get sunk the next day it takes hundreds of years.
So the fossil fuels took millions of years to create, we burn them in an instant and in order for the earth to turn them into fossil fuels again, the plants need to absorb them and die, get compressed over millions of years.
The man made difference is measurable month by month.
It's the excess that the planet cannot deal with.
Even the most unintelligent poster on here can surely get that.
Have you not read any of the peer reviewed studies on climate change.
Have you never understood the man made element.
Nobody can be that dense.
People on here quote the odd scientist as evidence against climate change.
But those individuals only criticise and never produce any scientific based evidence.
Show me just one peer reviewed study that says climate change is not happening so everyone can look at the evidence.
You cannot, because none exist.
Just go to the NOAA site, everything you should know is on there.
You convict yourself as being the most unintelligent poster on here.
Some good posts this morning.....then 1984 tries to cloud it by talking about CO2 levels again. We all know you're here to disrupt the board!....
Your obsession with Quady is comical ......................and childish.