RE: Dear Diary01 Mar 2021 14:32
Quady in two of your recent posts you’ve said.....
“but imagine we announce that we can get an open cut leading to production in two years” which when not challenged, led to
“and at PFS we are going to build cheaper and quicker, that could easily bring it under 3 years”
Then further...
“ a go for gold strategy would bring in revenues close to a billion a year minus costs.”
Just a friendly reminder that not a single drill or assay result to date has indicated that we have any near surface mineralisation which would support such a strategy. Yes, the PFS was delayed, again, with the stated goal of finding nearer surface stuff which could support open cut near surface work, but we haven’t found any yet. Which you know. Now it’s ok to dream, and post what you want to happen on here, but when you challenge other (more realistic?) posters when they dispute your theory that we’ll be pulling up gold in two to three years and paying a dividend shortly thereafter, that’s too much. I suspect Addicknt suppositions are far nearer reality than yours.