Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Sorry beast I missed your post because the other massive đđ was rabbiting on
No central bank or government is handing over power to supply money, it would collapse. The BoE already has a CBDC in development. Itâll be painful but the others will be banned overnight
China has already fired warning shots. A bitcoin like all other ponzi cryptos has no intrinsic value
It is worthless!
I hear you Rich, itâs just me passing time in retirement keeping the tampers at bay. Iâm around 65% down, so similar.
By the way, the reason Adieu is so keen on the 7.8p figure, itâs at that point he should be ÂŁ750 up on his week long investment. Heâs presently about even, despite days of endlessly thinking he was about to get rich quick.
ToS1963 - itâs a nail-biter for sure lol !
But I fear that the last laugh is on you, me, covgaz et.al - i.e the many, many long term holders/posters whoâve watched our investment being eroded for years here. I recently checked my trading account, and saw that Iâm 70% down on SolGold.
Then to add insult to injury, youâve got that plonker BBG labelling us a derampers. At this rate BBG will have pretty much everyone posting here on their list. Pathetic !
Letâs sincerely hope that things really can be turned around and very long suffering shareholders finally get a good pay day !
Iâm struggling to see what relevance 7.8p has. It is not a level of resistance
Just not today ay ?
Large BUYS gone through 800K & 400K, plus a load of 24,244 trades, over 2 million just traded.
7.8P WILL COME AGAIN
GL ALL
Youâre just a knob head. I couldnât care less if youâve sold your shares or not. But I know you havenât, itâs blatantly obvious
On the edge of my seat here, will covgazâs in the 6âs, or Adieuâs 10p be proven correct..... thereâs all to play for in the last 25 minutes of trading.......
Haha!!
As ever: slug is confronted with facts, doesn't want to refine his thinking so lashes out. A tale as old as time.
Can't say I didn't try to educate you. Some people's ignorance is not a sin but a trade.
You havenât sold them. Youâre too thick
Haven't watched it, not sure if solgold has any properties close by ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVOlnRSgPvY&ab_channel=MiningNetwork
You have no idea whether I've actually sold my shares or not đ
They reduced staffing to save costs, but there are thresholds of staffing they're not going to be able to dip below. I don't expect you to understand (see previous post regarding your proven ineptitude).
I'll make it simple for you sluggy - an 'out' from your hole, if you will. Which search engine will return results that say the carbon to oxygen double bonds in CO2 DON'T absorb in the part of the electromagnetic spectrum that the earth emits in. Show me that, and I'll show you a source of your problem with facts.
Google is grand thanks, but Springer, Wiley and OUP don't make all of their stuff available open source. Helps to have a library log in. Have you heard of libraries? Did they have them at your 'university', or was it mostly just crayons and safety scissors?
That push past 7.8 this afternoon is late starting Adieu.
Although a few months old, Scott stated the technical report would be released in parallel with the revised PFS.
https://youtu.be/prjh454RtxE?si=oiulhjZSCFcDXA6L
Adieuk32, for the April-22 PFS, SOLG also said they would file the Technical Report NI 43-101 within 45 days (which they did).
Nothing unusual there. 45 days is just the National Instrument filing requirement.
Separately, I asked if you could explain what you meant by:
"Ecuador government have 3 months, from December-23 to approve the development"?
Why did the sack the other few hundred then? How do you get through life being so incredibly dim?
If you think a fundraise is coming, why donât you sell your shares because theyâll go down? Is it because youâre incredibly thick or because you enjoy losing money?
Worked how to use a search engine that isnât google yet?
You don't - that doesn't make them optional. Just like it's not an option to default on loans or break environmental codes, without sinking the company.
I realise you're probably upset like the others here, but it seems strange that an investor would suggest a means of sinking the company when in reality we are just heading for a car crash of a fundraise (as I predicted).
As for how thick you are, slug... Who is to say? You've said some bonkers things but I've always assumed it was a combination of attention seeking and lack of education/critical thinking. Maybe you just say these things because you're plain dense. Who knows? Either way, well will add today's stupidity outburst to the growing list of things that prove you're thick as treacle.
CEO said in the interview last September, that he wanted to release the Technical Report with the Feasibility Study results.
5 BIG name players looked around the dataroom.
3 of the biggest mining companies in the World, already have a foot in the door, which one is ready to do business
I wonder if a T/O is holding up the report?
Another push this afternoon passed 7.80p
GL ALL
Jesus how thick?
How do you meet agreed investor commitments if youâre bust?
"And sack the rest of the Ecuadorean bum scratchers and call off all exploratory work. Cash bleed should be nowhere near $1m per month"
Realise you just wanted to get your favourite phrase in, denigrating local staff (don't worry slug, I'm sure mummy thinks your funny? đ¤ˇââď¸) but please, explain exactly how this would fit with our agreed investor commitments?
You can't, because it doesn't, but then you're never one to let the facts get in the way of your posts are you, sluggish?
For further evidence, see your posts about GDP under Thatcher (wrong), temperature 'not being a measure of anything' (direct quote, there was no additional context - wrong), CO2 isn't linked to global temperatures (wrong), Toyota developing an engine that 'runs on water' (hilariously wrong).
The question that arises this time around (unlike other occasions or past years) is what exactly is the cash raise for? When you go cap in cap for funds you need a really good clear outlined 'strategy' other wise investors will just say... what's the point of it and when's the next one lol!?
Many of us know the reasons for keeping the lights on, but here's a few questions to ponder on...
1. So you want to raise more cash... ok... what's it exactly for??
2. Is it to keep the lights on while you seek a sale?
3. Is it for exploration work?
4. Is it for Licence block fees eg or relinquish them as they cost about $6m per year
5. If the involves the above point 5... can't you farm some out... find partners ... fund it that way?
6. If it's for optimisation on ENSA... how much more optimisation do you need to do?
7. What's happening about the $170m committed spend to Ecuador gov? I know you are chatting about it... but what's the point of me injecting more cash if you can't answer that elephant in the room?
8. If doing a royalty again... I expect the royalty business will want shareholders to stump up a similar amount like last time?? I presume one is conditional upon the other?
9. If Ecuador gov agree to shuffle the $170m into pre production spend... what happens to the $75m you've committed to on the deal struck last year??
10. If constantly raising cash... wouldn't waving future bonus shares to directors be the right thing to do as we're not keen investing more funds into SOLG if management keep issuing binus awards for things like strategic reviews that never seem to materialise.
So yes... cash is required to keep the lights on, but as you can see, the truth comes ever closer and that truth is... SOLG needs bucket loads of cash going forwards... unless they plan a JV or sale. And IMHO... they'll need to confirm the latter to any future funding partner or royalty stream deal before anyone agrees to anything. Otherwise... it's just an empty hole with 101 unanswered SOLG questions left dangling in the air.
Oh whatanight exactly my sentiment they have never seemed to get this organised
Not one single event has been followed up by and this is how we are going to finance it
They just get mile stones out, and then nothing and watch the share price twindle
I don't know why BBG has my name on his list while forgetting to add his name to the listđ
I note that yesterday he had my post regarding his Bedlamite condition removed!
It certainly would be interesting to see a breakdown on what that $1m a month is being spent on.
"Millions of ounces of gold or an expensive computer algorithm that can and will be shut down overnight"
demonstrating a clear lack of knowledge here on hash rate and network adoption. Sorry was I wrong that SOLG has outperformed ?? You will look even sillier by end of this year when SOLG has slid further and btc is knocking on the door of 100k