Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Its as complicated as you like to make it but basically it was a political decision to cancel the contract and attack the company not a commercial or science based one.
Most understand that. I just hope the judge does.
After June you will be gone like a rat up a drain pipe. Get a life P100 and a new share come June.
So the Post Office hired dodgy Lawyers who helped screw the poor Post-Masters and lie.
Does the DHCS hire the same or similar Lawyers to cover their incompetence & lie.
Seems there is a lot of scum in our current legal systems - the coming Court-cases will be interesting
My play has always been that too but having bought so many between 40p and 50p I will take 25% off the table around the 90p mark if it gets there before the dispute is settled.
Just a bit of sensible risk management and not a reflection on what I think the outcome will be.
2 to 3 to many for most of us p100
but you need the pay cheque dont you :)
to all lth have a relaxing weekend, not long now... and we will see the last **** take 100
Harris..my play is on the big one..the decision.
What it does in between doesn't matter to me. ... It will be make or break for my holding
Can understand going for the trade though
CS I was thinking the same thing a few days back when that rns came out, there was a sense that that was the build up and ‘sell the news’ moment.
Still, as long as the SP treads water next rather than retracing back to 60p we’ll see another leg up again in May.
2536 NEGATIVE posts is the main point…….isn’t it now…..appears when red, disappear’s when blue……dirty little agenda
2.5k posts since Aug 2021 so 2/3 a day on average. 25 in the last 30 days so .83 a day on average.
Hardly 2.5k+ in the 'last few months', is it now?
Le meilleur message de notre forum
Logos. Boursorama file
03:56
It will be enough to demonstrate that there is indeed an abusive breach of contract for Novacyt to be able to claim financial compensation.
It does not matter from this corollary that the DNHC had valid reasons for contesting, the rupture in itself constitutes a fraudulent maneuver punishable by conviction.
The dominant position of the contractor is at the origin of the conflict. Novacyt suffers the consequences, however non-existent for the DHNC
The disastrous management of the DNHC, where tests are reported scattered across the UK in abandoned warehouses, says a lot about their incompetence
The internal exchanges brought to the debate also prove their total lack of coordination and the political debacle of its leaders.
A stock priced at nearly €14 which declines to €0.50 constitutes a significant argument for assessing the damage suffered by shareholders.
If the DHNC falters during the trial, it is no longer the reimbursement, but the interest which risks doing very, very bad things.
The law firm chosen by Novacyt says a lot about the possible conclusions to come.
If the DHNC had had compelling merits, the summary judgment would have immediately closed the debate.
Whereas their challenges do not justify the authority to deliver justice in place of sovereign authority, they have therefore committed an offense which deserves reparation.
Everyone will be able to find an argument in favor of DNHC, or Novacyt, whatever.
The key to this trial, however, is the reality of an abusive breakup which outweighs any other development.
If Novacyt succeeds, it will be able to claim much more than a simple reimbursement.
The arrangement should have been made well before, the devious person of the summary request must now invite them to pillory them unceremoniously.
Now, no more concessions, the trial and their scalp.
It must be pretty obvious to all that this poster, with their 2500> posts over the past few months, has a deliberate agenda to pour negativity continually over this share. I suspect for trading reasons because only a moron would put the effort in that this twat does. Happy bank holiday all!
i think some people are selling cos they might have bought in for a quick trade on the hope of a collapse of gov case after pre trial and or negotiation...or even just the jump from mid 40s
i can't imagine lth are going to sell after waiting for so long...
i know i considered selling to buy back in lower..but could not be ****d.
win or lose it will be transformational to so..so a 10% or so isn't go to be worth the effort
i think it will go to trial 100% now...but could easily be wrong.
Hi Surfie I blocked that poster many months ago, recently piecing together other reply's to said poster I understand they were only quoting nova/primer revenues and not yourgene.
Of course that may be wrong but frankly I don't care.
Obviously not a dig at you:))
No PI has popped on here to tell us this is crashing at 45p, at 50p, at 55p, at 60p and now at 70p.
I promise you if this is 150p in a year and it goes back to 140p pi100 will be on here saying ‘typical ncyt pump and dump’ and someone like you will say ‘got to hand it to him’
There’s no logic or thought to any post, it’s just childish moaning and desire to see this fall.
A clock is right twice a day....
imo this is STILL a traders share
hopefully not for much longer !!!!
PI100 the main reason SP falling, being some investors are selling. They may needs funds for Tax or paying for their summer holidays. This will come good at £3.50!!
And again today. The market isn’t silly, they know the operational performance is diabolical so just resetting after the false rise.
P100 might moan a bit but you have to admit ever since the supposedly good news of the rejection of summary judgment the S.P. has gone down. It's boody depressing.
100 well it least it only monthly :)
where as, you are almost "hourly" :)
High-risk patients with #COVID symptoms should use PCR rather than rapid tests, study suggests
The sensitivity of rapid tests was 47%, compared with RT-PCR and 80% versus viral culture.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/high-risk-patients-covid-symptoms-should-use-pcr-rather-rapid-tests-study-suggests
None, probably. The exact same rns comes at the same time every month.
Deal
Which confirms the interest of a judgment which takes on its full value with your research and your arguments.
Rejection of summary judgment is consistent
Given the interests at stake, there will indeed be a judgment on the merits.
Or an arrangement if both camps find mutual interest
Little time left to close a deal
Ultimately, we, the small shareholders, are not any more enlightened
We just avoided the ax of summary judgment
Have a good Bank hols all , that's me off for a mini vacation.
Yes indeed Winnie.
GM put money aside to replace tests the NHS said they couldn't use. It is my belief that he was prepared as a goodwill gesture to replace the original Exsig with Promate , the DHSC weren't interested, they had moved onto LFTS. The replacement is not an admission of any guilt it was done to try and ensure continuity of business and to try and ensure the lucrative phase 2 of the contract was signed. That's imo , see also Exmexes earlier post , detailing some of the places Exsig was used , with details provided .