Member Info for wyndrum

Although its fair to say it could be read as potentially keeping Coris, I imagine its a bit of sales blurb to entice a buyer only because CC has explicitly said AVCT is to be a pure TX co.

If she has had a change of mind, it would be nice to be kept in the loop,

And even if we are not selling Coris, I would also imagine its because no one wants to buy it (at an agreed price), rather than us wanting to keep it.

Nlgb, I believe that Trumps rating have increased since he took this action but there are 2 different groups here.

one are the big (relatively very few) firm bosses who want globalisation because its makes them vastly richer against the hugely populous,american "worker" who, through globalisation have seen their industries decimated and earnings reduced due to lower wages elsewhere in the world.

Trump is the president of the US, not the world. Its his job to make the US and its citizens wealthier.

Where I think this likely falls down is that if he brings production back to the states is that the cost of production through higher wages, will make their goods uncompetitive, (which is why the jobs were outsourced in the first place), and won't sell globally.

If he goes down the self sufficient route ala the old USSR, then that normally leads to economic and industrial stagnation making it hard to catch up.

Basically wherever you live in the world and whatever you do, throughout the history of mankind, if you have money its a better place then if you are poor. Today is no different.

It remains to see how this plays out, but when you are poor or feel you have little or nothing, with little or no opportunity to change things, then you consider whatever options present themselves and when Trump stood for election many saw that has a lifeline.

IVITK, would this be the same US gold reserves that Trump wants to visually inspect in Fort Knox as he is not convinced its actually there?

That would be funny in a very destructive, what-am-I-thinking sort of way.....

This is a real showdown.

America buys goods from China. China with all that money, buys US debt.

Given the US has to, for at least some time borrow 100's of billions then who will help keep the lights on in the US?

And indeed, what if they start dumping US treasuries.....

Who will help out the US now?

Thanks laura

The spin as you put it , is negative because its an attempt to understand why this greatest breakthrough in cancer treatment has been in a down trend for the last 4 years.

Laura, is this normal in your experience, 4 times NT?

( I have not access to L2 data)

Ok watching less play this out:

"Or they are under no pressure to sell coris"

says who? of the 2 DX companies this was loss making. The profitable one has been sold but the loss maker is still with AVCt even though they want to be a TX company only, so why would they be under no pressure to sell it? Has it come off for sale?

"Because they know they have got and big pharmas are already in negotiations with them"

So why are they doing yet another poster presentation? that all costs money

Last week the SP at its high was 37p. It then fell to around 30p so more than a 20% fall in a matter of days. Does that suggest to you a deal is about to be announced?

I ask because you are making the counter argument up and I am just asking for some rational reasoning behind it.

"Dispose of coris and onboard an II Shouldn't be hard."

Hard to say Alderbaran, if you are trying to sarcastic or serious.

If serious the fact that hasn't happened suggests it is hard, and if it is hard , its harder now in this climate.

I see we are in full on delete Wydrum posts today.

My response to the original request offered no advice but to suggest him/her various things to ponder and what the hoped for outcome would be. Not anti AVCT or anything at all to do with any violation of a singlr LSE guideline.

Likewise my response to Chris.

Still you, who ever you are, crack on denying opinion that so far has proved to be more accurate and dare i say, insightful than the mostly optimistic rose tinted posts that crowd out rational debate here.

Why would you put this in your isa?

You don't see the developments of the last few months making this look riskier than ever?

This is a wake up, smell the coffee moment.

It looks like AVCT could be overtaken by events. What happens if the SP goes below 30p? do you think that might have psychological impact?

How many here are now stuck with the "its gone too low to even sell"?

Bella, please point to a post you have made that has ever been correct.

SB: "The usual drivel, why do you bother, ...... God it’s boring."

So, which bit is drivel specifically? Sp is 31.5p

I have urged caution for years and how so far, how has it worked out?

Or is it more, you simply don't want to be reminded or alerted to the potential failure of such high risk stocks as this?

Would you have been happier if newbies coming to this BB, bought in from say 100p all the way down on the back of all the "great" predictions of SP gain?

Is it just, you only feel comfortable in an echo chamber?

As best as I can see, Dr Tap is a quote for hire, gets shown encouraging data from numerous trials, makes an encouraging statement and moves on.

Pretty good thanks D as electrics go but they are all pretty heavy and not like the combustion variety.

But very relaxing and quiet (as you might expect), and a reasonable antidote which given the highly strung world we live where it seems the harder we run the slower we go, right for its time.

(Still the acceleration is very exhilerating which is a wierd feeling when at any other time it feels so heavy.)

So given our crowded stop go roads and (lives), its very well suited.

All the best

Perhaps the difference is ,I think I already see the "fundamentals" while you still believe they are to be revealed.

Further I have been calling this stock disappointring for about 4 years now. And always hahead of the SP So it is very ungenerous of you to say its market conditions, and further, if it was just market conditions then where has the "sell now buy later" calls been from you and others, to take advantage of what has come to pass. (Or are you just going to use hindsight as your get-out-of-jail card to explain why the SP has collappsed.?)

Well done Chris, add that to all your other insightful predictions,

I want this to succeed because of what they are attempting.

Honestly I don't think its a case of it "it doesn't work" I think its a case of does it work well enough to be commercially successful?

I think all the signs are are that that is likely but there have been some odd results or outcomes that have been a bit head scratching and meant that there needs to be more cohorts, more dosing, more patients and different cancers approached to see if there can be more predictable outcomes to remove doubts.

This takes time and money and that then causes its own problems.

I simply cannot see or fathom that a forecast 2 year trial that will take 5 and that has had all the changes that it has, has "exceeded" any expectation. Yes if the SP simply had continued to improve then you can make a rational argument that its taking longer because it is better than forecast.

But to fallback on the lazy assumptions with no evidence at all, that this is a fantastic breakthtough in cancer treatment and the only reason it has been falling in value for 4 years of better and better data is simply that its Traders and casino type behaviour is just ridculous.

There are planty of big "serious" companies that either are on or started on AIM.

Maybe there are partners about to be announced, but why now and not last week, or last month or last year? what has changed now. I would say nothing. P1b is aways off. If it was always about p1b data then why keep going on about buy-outs while P1a was going on? Which in turn means it was NEVER about p1a , which meant a lower SP was always on the cards as money ran down to be replenished routinely.

Is that taional or is that fud? Quick, get Ai to have a go at it.

You can't have it always.

"They should all be banned, it’s obvious they all work in a call centre on behalf of the shorters to spread misinformation and FUD. Or they are just bitter old men."

or perhaps just passing on their own experience in case it might be of use to others? I don't know why you always assume the very worst in strangers just because they hold a different view point to you.

Also I find it instructive that while you don't see any comparison with Harl (which is fair enough, they are/were 2 different companies, but as I say this situation reminded me of some broad similarities), yet you use precedent of other companies situations to value potential buy out prices of other stocks you own. (but obviously only when it suits you.)

Just seems a bit like cherry-picking to me.

Maybe med but th