Member Info for wyndrum

FP, it doesn't actually, as a projected figure it is just that. It does not nor cannot know, what might happen in that timescale to increase or decrease that projection.

Its not meaningless but not really of much help either.

( I think I might just bring in a sun lamp as you all seem so worried about the lack of sunlight posters here get, although you all seem to manage to post and still have sufficient Vit D levels... )

Ben, $1.7b in 5 years....

What would AVCTs profit be, assuming every single Dox treatment used it?

You have brought it up so this is a question worth answering I think, rather than the always dismissive "Another Wyndrone question mark!" that by asking these questions I try to get some light on these remaks and observations.

If we don't know the profit margin then what does that figure mean exactly?

What will AVCTs tech add to the cost? How elastic is the cost of treatment?

There are so many many unknowns at this stage that it is impossible to value AVCT at all, (other than just what the market thinks on any given day.)

There are as of yet, no fundamentals, no sales, no profit forecasts.

What there are, are more trials, more costs, more projected timelines without funding in place to get to the end.

You see the problem the market has, don't you? (I only mention this because AIM, is a thick as mince, corrupt MM's, trader-only casino.)

Nice Passive aggressive LDA... like it... also the smug, I-am-better-than-you, thrown in. ..... very nice.

Well fear not Tim, you certainly have not enriched mine either.

Paul, re: the military protection, I agree that the west took a free ride. The EU and the UK are starting to do something about that and they now will no longer trust the US to adhere to the NATO treaty. Does that make the world a safer place? Could the same result have been achieved without the distrust? Don't know.

The US like all western countries lives beyond its means and gets away with it on a ponzi scheme of growth always continuing to service the debt until it becomes unsustainable. the US is in the same boat as the rest.

I can't work out if Trump is actually pretty smart or a tyrant. He could be a smart tyrant but even so, and even though i share your concerns about China, he managed to make me root for them. (And I am reasonably level-headed._

I think what we learned over the last few weeks is that whichever super power, China or the US, decides what it wants to do, the rest of the world does not get a say one way or the other, so it really, in any practical sense, doesn't matter whether its the US or China.

(The US is as "despicable" as China for suppressing democracy, supporting dictators, getting elected govts overthrown, torture, racism you name it. (all nations if they have the power, do it, tuns out its human nature)

Given politicians are ego maniacs (comes with the job), none of them will have liked being humiliated by Trump. He has treated friend and foe the same, so where was the benefit of being an ally?

Can the rest of the world do something... don't know, but I bet they try, just to "prove" they are not as superfluous as they have been publicly made to look.

This version of civilisation is drawing to a close. its inevitable as all civilisations do. What replaces it? who knows, but we all be long dead so who cares anyway. as my old pal Confucius says:

“We have two lives; the second begins when we realise we only have one.”

" How many are making a profit?"

if that was aimed at me, I would assume none.

How many succeed?

The US is quite the macro example of tiny little AVCT: Thats what happens when a loss maker needs funding. Its not in control of its own destiny.

This was ALL ABOUT the bond market.

It took 15 hours for him to cave.

Like all bullies whether you know it or not, there is always somebody bigger and tougher that won't be pushed around.

90 days, we'll see....

This has caused a huge global crisis and the way he has treated his allies is going to bite him very hard on his so-called "kissed " ass

D, It seems to be an incoherent policy. The idea apparently is to use the income of Tariffs to fund tax cuts for the US workers.

So if countries did end up doing these trade deals and tariffs fell he would not have the money for the tax cuts...

I think I read the interest paid on their national debt per day is around $2.7b and every 10 point base increase costs an extra $100m per day.

T-Bills yields are rising due to this tariff policy and will negate quite a lot of the tariff income anyway. (He should talk to Liz, see how it worked out for her....)

Anyway, you have a lovely break. I am sure the sun will shine when you get there.

Well, Watching thanks for the compliment, (I think). As I have never used AI the fact you think my posts are so intelligent suggests my basic non-AI helped thought process is ok.

Of course you may think that I still use AI and the posts are still rubbish, in which case you best have a chat with your alter ego Ice cool as Ai but not be all that after all.

By the way, and of course you won't answer this, but logically how can I be "spreading negativity" when the SP has been in a downward (negative) trend for 4 years? Is that not more a case of trying to understand why?

Happy with the time taken so far? happy that we sacked our CEO and you don't know why? Happy that we have had to do numerous cash raises to keep going? Happy that we bought the DX companies? Happy that we are selling them at a loss?

Happy that the SP has collapsed? Happy that the LFT failed? Happy that AVCT have never commercialised any of their tech? Happy that you have constantly misled posters here with 100% guaranteed price rises from whatever the price was on the day you posted such fatuous comments?

"T/O @£5 imo

What’s your thoughts?"

if it was anyone else expecting that I would ask for some thoughtful analysis as to how you got a 15 bagger before a take out but as its you Watching, I'll pass and just get another tissue to wipe my eyes...

They say unhappiness, avct, is recognised by the individual as being worse off then their peers.

Looking at this BB, because most here are nursing financial losses, there is a resentment to anyone saying that that situation does not apply to them.

Your unhappiness seems to revolve around hearing about anyone doing better than you. That's a bit sad really when you think about it.

But you are not alone, you have many friends here that are so angry with their personal AVCT holding, that they won't even accept that somebody might have dodged the bullet on this one and therefore they simply shout out that "it must be lies, you can't possibly have done ok here, therefore you are a fantasist and delusional!"

All this just because I bought low and sold high enough times to fashion a free ride. oh, well...

Rubbish, like everyone elses. I have however been fortunate enough to profit from the rises and falls over the last 4 years and not only do I have a free ride on my holding but am in overall profit. So I can afford to continue to hold in the hope, that all this verbiage from the company does actually translate into a tangible and positive outcome.

(I have stopped holding my breath)

"Trying to spread doubt about a company who just wants to save lives"

Don't be so disingenuous.

I have looked at AVCt only as an investment as you well know, and my doubt to their progress (to date) has turned out to be well founded.

If anybody had actually been influenced by my opinions they would be financially better off.

However, you are not remotely interested in the well being of others financially or otherwise, you are just a silly immature person who hasn't an insightful thought in their head.

Perhaps the label "sad" would more aptly apply to your constant pathetic and small minded whining about me.

I would say grow up but as you act like a spoilt 11 year old I presume thats probably your age.

Perhaps we could have this discussion after AVCT actually have a commercial product to sell?

That would be a first in itself.

".... how many people lost money over this."

And how many made money?

Too much conspiracy theory ...imo...

My bad..:0(

I am not sure we do disagree about Truss.. at all...

But I am not convinced about the markets involvement, I think they just took a step back because they were never alerted to what was coming and to do any calculations and modelling before hand.

The behind the scenes stuff was indeed the Blob....

Still, nowt we can do about it...

Paul, I mentioned at the time here that I thought the lockdown was an over reaction and that the cost of the cure was greater than the illness.

That went down like a cup of cold sick here... but hey ho.

As for financial institutions, basically they are pawn brokers. They lend you the money on the assumption they will get it back one way or the other. What they don't care about is how the individual, or this case, the country spends it on.

Its just got to the tipping point now that they are not so sure about getting their money back so are increasingly reluctant to keep the money-go-round spinning.

(Trouble is I remember in the early/mid 70's when had to ask/beg the IMF for loans to keep the lights on. They dictated the cuts to public spending as a requirement of the bailout. The govt could do nothing about it. The NHS budget was cut with everything else. then came the winter of discontent, then came Thatcher.

The wheel turns....

I think the "lasting damage" has been for political class to realise they don't run the country any more.

Basically we are now pretty much in a soviet-style communist state (whoever is elected), where the elite are immune to everyday trials and tribulations from the corrupt merry go-round of jobs-for-the-boys, with no reference to ability, to gilt edged pensions that the populace are denied.

The higher taxes rise, the more the state does. And therefore the more the population depends and demands of and on the state. That ever-decreasing, non-productive circle has been the accelerated direction of travel since the 70's with the short term exception on the thatcher years.

if you realise we have thought crimes now and what the police choose to and not to, respond to, the level of surveillance, the powerlessness of talking to the state whether its a call to the HRMC, or your council or your local MP, let alone getting any sort of timely response from monopolies controlled by the state (health, energy water education.), then its pretty clear

This 50 year experiment of soviet style govt has now driven the borrowing to the point where "elected" officials are no longer in charge, hence my point up top.