Member Info for wyndrum

Yes Chris you are right, it was more a "location" joke.

"I am sure you have said something witty at least once Wyn."

well as you ask pedro, I mentioned back in the LFT days, that the large spread on the SP reminded me of a girl knew.

The recs, while not in Indy's range, clearly saw the humour.

Its almost like there is more to all of us than what we project on these "narrow" boards.

Sorry Roses, it really doesn't.

All a chart is is a graphical representation of the SP movement.

Its People that buy and sell and if you believe people are predictable than the patterns charts make often repeat themselves. Then there are various "indicators" used in conjunction with these patterns to try and improve the odds of making the right call. (These "indicators are just algo's of the SP.)

Cheers

Ray, I try to maximise profit.

I have found having used charts for 40 years that it helps enormously to time entry and exit.

I don't day trade stocks as the spread kills it and I am not going to use leveredge so small moves are not worth the risk.

As for this particular one, I have no idea on if it will be successful or not. But I Have bought and sold many companies in this sector with the "golden ticket" and many are still on track but have yet to deliver. In the meantime the clkock ticks, time passes and on loss makers dilution continues.

Other safer stocks however have gone up in leaps and bounds over the last 5-10 years.

Timing is not just important... its everything.

Cheers and Good luck

Ah... fair enough.

(Although 10 years ago the SP was about where it is now)

Hopefully for all hear, this is it.

Violin, may I ask what time frame are you using? Thanks

Moonparty, the biggest problem I come across with PI's is emotive responses.

Characterising likely moves in emotional terms of positive or negative immediately colours the conversation.

Shares go up and shares go down, They can go up in a down trend and down in an up trend.

All a view posted should be backed up with some reasoning for their view.

And thats it, then the reader can decide on the merits or not of the logic employed.

What the diff Wildforce? You don't have all the info when you "invest" so its a gamble (educated or not). You don't know if unexpected news will be revealed (good or bad), There are a variety of outside factors that you don't know about or can control that can aid or not, your "investment" So it becomes a bit of an odds game too, don't you think? And not for nothing the market is already looking about 3-6 months ahead so has priced in the likelyhood of in this case, good news, so again you are deciding you know better than the collective market what WILL happen over the next 12 months plus. Again, back to what are the odds?

Just sayin'

D again fwiw, I wait for it to be at least 80 rather than too close to it, So If it was above 70 say, 72 ish I would not buy : if I was already in I would not sell unless it was 80 plus. Foe me 80 increases the odds quite dramatically of the probability of a fall.

It closed at 78.57 last night at 18.5p

I am guessing with another 10% increase its in the 80's now?

As I say I would not buy at this time/level

For perspective I would be more relaxed if it went up further and fell back to 25p and I bought in at that level if the RSI was no longer over bought.

I focus more on reducing the potential likelyhood of loss rather than chasing a toppy stock, but seriously, thats just me.

D, it looks pretty toppy and is over bought territory, however the chart is choppy around these levels although you have to go back over a year to see new support resistance levels.

My best guess is that even if it goes higher it is likely (maybe!) to retrace to about 17p as with this momentum it aims for 26p plus.

This is just snapshot based on today and we are not at a close so If it were me as a new potential buyer I would hold off and risk missing out on the next probable, leg up, to wait for a retrace. (imo dyor etc etc)

Check out Kippers history.

I think its called "trolling"

very strange character and perhaps not quite the ticket? After all this is an investment BB to discuss AVCT

Seaangler, my view is that MM's will push the price up or down in a limited way to test demand at support/resistance levels.

So when it fell yesterday to a support level they probably pushed it further to see if it would trigger a lot of sell or buys and then react with getting the correct stock levels in advance to do their job, which is to make an orderly market.

As I say every lse BB and and every single stock according to posters, is constantly manipulated. I find this frequency of criminal acts with potential imprisonment on a role that with a spread allows good profits for the MM's is frankly absurd.

Again, just fwiw, every single LSE chat BB I have visited over the years tends to think that MM's manipulate their stock. But only when it falls.

When it rises the narrative changes to good value being recognised and the demand being a good indicator of further rise. MM manipulation never gets mentioned.

I find that instructive.

I am not saying it never ever happens but it is a criminal act and the houses involved would/could be struck off. Their role is to make an orderly market. In aim stocks when demand can turn very quickly they tend not to hold much if any stock, so in those situations you may well see "odd" trades but even then not all trades are immediately shown and can take days to show. An in any event there is nothing we can do about it.

I do come back to this analogy, if you were going to a casino that you know is rigged why would you place a bet? if you do however place your bet then I don't know why you would howl at the moon that it was rigged against you?

Keep up kipper I told you what I thought the chart implied last week.

(oh I did mention that it would likely retrace to 82/83p)

Still i am sure that was just more hindsight

Seeing as the majority of your posts are simp;ly aimed at me to slag me off, it is notable that your posting history over the last 12 months is littered with, is it us, any day now, leek, deals imminent, chinese ready to move etc etc etc etc.

You have been wrong every single time. Not once have you been correct. Not once.

Yet you happily post garbage almost every day about any post you disagree with.

Are you paid to do this?

Do you think the shorter is an individual here?

"Yep I’m doing my little bit by topping up each time it drifts back into mid 150s. If enough of us LTH with some cash on the side do this it will provide a bit of a floor for the shorters to continuously bounce up against. "

er.. its a £1b plus value company. none of us make any difference to the SP ever whether its through posting, buying or selling.

If you really think you (and the rest of us) can manipulate the market in this stock then you need to think again

Sorry D, misread the last line of your post regarding the red black thing :0((

Thanks Nr.

As we all know nothing is fool proof and I had tried LTH, tip sheets, penny shares, big companies, read books etc etc.

I eventually turned to trading out of it was the only thing I had not tried!

I day traded for 3 years but not successfully enough and I was hamstrung by the fear and greed emotional pull which is magnified when you are leveredge up and "have to" close your postion overnight.

But it taught me a lot of the mechanics and more importantly me (in this case).

Since I have done this now for fun and taken away the pressure of the "day" aspect and only betting relatively now small amounts, I can keep the emotions by and large out of it.

It may be why post so much here... it might just be an emotional release from the trading? Who knows? But your rational self assessment of your character suggests you are pretty astute imo.

The reason so many fail in trading and they do, is because they can't let go of their emotional bias so the "system" is blamed rather than the execution.

Anyway, roll on avct. atb.