Member Info for wyndrum

on Talk Sport last evening they were reporting that the league cup final is looking to have 8000 fans in attendance using (their words) Lateral Flow Tests on entry and exit. (I mean if you only let people in with no virus and you double check on the way out, then I don't know why you would limit it to 8000 but never mind that), as this was breaking news, it suggests a new test is or would be available.....

Ok, everyone I'm wrong. Its this month, sorry.

Matt I don't think the deadline is missed I just don't think the deadline is within Q1. I think the very expression "around" end of Q1 means almost by definition not Q1 but a week or 2 after. and with AS's own history I would expect it to be late rather than early.

I think expectation was within Q1 (certainly here it was or is) and that's the problem and now with Boris hinting at April 5th maybe some money has gone elsewhere.

I really don't know why you assume I always have an ulterior motive? I can't move the SP, (would that I could!), you know that, as well as everybody else, so just take my comments at face value. (or don't of course, its entirely up to you.)

Vegas, I can't be responsible for what others think. I have not suggested they trade on my opinion. you are guessing that on no evidence, no poster has ever said they have bought or sold on any my posts, so why assume they would?

My posts I believe are balanced. AS has most recently said "around the end of Q1" I'm not making that up or guessing, he said that.

"Around" to me in this context , means a couple of weeks either way. Now, given his track record, why would anyone think it will be early rather than later?

If I am so wrong and the news release is literally coming in the 2 or 3 days, then whys is the SP falling?

vegas, its not negative for goodness sake. it is the reality. AS has created for whatever reason, a history of repeatedly missing dates he himself proposes.

Do you remember when Q3 came and went and it was all going to be Q4? A number of us, me included, posted to say, words to the effect of " well, having looked a bit foolish missing Q3 he wont miss Q4 because that would look awful, and in fact it will probably come out early Q4 just to re-confirm that he can surprise to the upside."

So I will be delighted if its next week but really there is no evidence that it will be and and his actual words are vague to releasing data WITHIN Q1.

Vegas, because, AS said "around end Q1". That gives him wiggle room to go into Q2. Do you really, based on every single utterance AS has ever made on a test timeline, expect for him to actually be early?

On Feb the 24th Bams info in 2-3 weeks. Now its "backburner". If AS can not so much miss a deadline of only 3 weeks but then says, demand has effectively made it redundant , then you have to have some caution on what to expect surely?

You don't have to look for any MM conspiracy:

AVCT from an outside perspective, only ever misses test deadlines. It. It looks now as though it will be early April at best.

So how can you judge what the SP will likely be on an unknown quantity of demand, unknown time of availability, and unknown profit margin and unknown longevity of test? And.... the most basic of all...will it be us?

And obviously don't forget, most shareholders now will be in very big profits and its not unreasonable, some would say prudent even, to take some or all of that profit with actually a great level of uncertainty still exists.

Most here having waited this long will wait a bit longer, but not everyone is us.

"Does no-one listen to them in their private lives and so they have to come on here and try to sound important ?"

Its not me that post 20 times a day here. Its not me that says they have made an unsubstantiated £m but posts here several times every day

Its not me that says this will be a 100 bagger in 10 years or 20 or 25.

But it is me that tries to engage with PP on her investment strategy but you will find she never, ever, ever, joins in the discussion.

Its just Ramp Ramp Ramp. Draw your own conclusions.

Ha ha

"They are only interested in greed and don't care about shareholders with their shorts and their blown out of all proportion report on Boohoo."

This from PP with her million that she wants to turn into £100m. But hey its all about the ethics.....

(Honestly I don't care or have an opinion on BH going up or down. Each to their own, but PP imo in over 40 years of investing is either just weird or deliberately trying to get people to buy this stock on unfounded predictions. Be so careful of taking any note of her. Its very easy to hear what you want to hear and get starry eyed about stocks and the money and you are going to make. That is how con-artists operate. …remember …. if its too good to be true...…)

its a bit OT but, from the EU's POV, the UK has to be a "disaster economy" having left the EU, so that they can demonstrate how good it is to be part of the EU, and to some extent or other, as all the nations have some anti-EU factions/parties it is imperative for the survival of the EU that this happens.

The Vaccine from their perspective is the worst outcome possible: the UK (through luck judgement, who knows or cares) has been quicker to react simply because it was not part of the EU. That freedom to make rapid unilateral decisions has resulted in thousands of lives saved rather than lost.

From an EU citizens pov, what is the point of the EU if the very most basic, important reason for being in it, is to have better protection, they are slower to react than an individual nation state?

This is the EU's worst nightmare, an ex-member doing better than the others left still in. What then is the point if being in the club?

So yes, there will be a lot of anti-UK rhetoric about the vaccine, how we cheated to get it, how we stored it up, denied any export, how its basically all the UK's fault that the EU and its citizens have been denied life saving vaccines by the UK.

This could taint relations for years if all parties are not careful.

Tiger I am sure you are correct that the director buys were not without reason

Its a well known indicator for others to use and follow. However due to its typical use of being a positive, some directors use that to deceive investors, and buy their own stock hoping to shore up the SP. This is important because loans to companies are often based on the value of said company and the higher SP the better loan to value ratio it is.

The actual amount in pound notes is very small as director buys go and as a result it has not had a particularly positive effect on the SP. It could be the directors don't have much money, or don't have as much faith in their predictions as they preach. Who knows?

What I do know is that until recently I have held more share of EVE for longer than CC has. What does that tell you?

No Phantom, i'm not looking for an argument at all but as I trade and had just posted a remark, your response to Div's post seemed to then go out of your way to disparage people who use different methods to make a profit. (I don't think you meant it as a compliment to liken me to a "barrow boy"?)

As I say I am not that prickly as this probably sounds, (really I'm not), but I can't tell you how tedious it is for someone like me who has been using a trade style background to make, I think good, consistent returns over many years to be somehow denigrated at almost any and every opportunity as that somehow my method is less "pure" than an "investors" or has less merit, or whatever.

You may not have meant anything at all in what you said and are amazed at my reaction. If so, I would then politely ask, why make the Barrow Boy comment at all, if it was just saying what a helpful post, Div's was?

Anyway, please accept this in the spirit it was meant and it is not wanting to be inflammatory or argumentative at all.

And you concisely D, see the difference between a fundamental approach and a Chart based approach. (The pump & dump scenario is well highlighted and its one reason why this stock is not a share to trade, its too illiquid, its too easily manipulated and the spread is too wide.)

I tend to try and merge both FA and TA, so if I take the view that EVE looks like fundamentally a "good company" then I will use TA to try and time my entry, so I would as an example, wait for 4.2p and buy then. (I have to say right now I am not as confident as you are about the long term viability EVE, I think its right back in the balance again, and guess what? The next update will be crucial!! ha ha, how many times have we said that!)

But that's the thing, its just opinion, none of us know what's going to happen, we pull the trigger and then keep our fingers crossed we hit the target.

ok, but one does not always coincide with the other

Hi D, I just would start by saying (from a chartists POV), that forward guessing is pretty dangerous because you start to see what you want to see, and given there are always 2 directions the SP can go in, all a chartist is trying to do is weigh up the chances of one move being more likely than the other.

Right, having got that out of the way, I think just based on a corresponding indicator the fall probably is not done yet and the 4.2p is (imo) likely to be revisited.

Assuming it is and it rises from there, then ultimately the stock would be in a "trading range" of 4.2p -6.8p (which is quite a range as you can see!) and from a chart perspective you might not want to buy until 6.8p was breeched. But as the range is so large then on that upward journey there will be new patterns and short term supports and resistances to be dealt with which would/could change that view point.

I don't like all this sitting on a fence malarkey but it is part of the interpretation I'm afraid. However, To be definitive at this time, I would say the long term view would be not to invest until 6.8p was broken.

Remember charting is not about being right or wrong as much as maximising gains if you are correct and minimising losses if you are wrong. So assuming just for the sake of argument it fell to 4.2p, yes there could be reasons to buy, but if it fell to 4.p you would immediately sell, as your decisions was that at 4.2p it would rise, if it went to 4.p then clearly you were wrong and you need to get out to safeguard capital. That's how it becomes trading. You don't just sit on your hands when what you thought would happen, doesn't.

Its come down to a support here at 5.4p. if it holds then it looks to be a likely low point for the stock and therefore a very good chance to maximise gains going forward for new purchases.

However (there is always an "however"), the indicators are in very neutral territory at the current price which suggests that a further fall could be on the cards. So if 5.4p does go then an SP of around 4.6p-4.7p would be next with a chance of 4.2p being revisited. (that's only going back to mid Feb, so its not outlandish to see that develop.

So fingers crossed 5.4p holds,if not then sub 5p beckons with a potential look at 4.2p

Good luck HKK getting any meaningful exchange with PP. Also I would like to know, what at 26p or whatever piece it was with the info available at the time allowed her to see the potential? What research, research, research, was available then.?being a relatively new IPO and losing money, what made her, by her criteria think, this is the one?

She keeps saying do your research but never gives any criteria as to what might have to happen to BH say, to make her sell? Never ever talks about the flip side of the coin.

The slave labour and tax fraud allegations at the time for BH were terrible. But apparently, this share Guru with so much time for family and others was quite happy to keep recommending a stock that was accused of these potential SP reducing allegations.

As it is, the US court case looms over BH. And it may all disappear but surely if you were researching now, what's going on at BH right now, would give at least pause for concern?

But none of these areas for legitimate, friendly debate will be touched by PP.

What do you want phantom? Do you want the SP to go up or for AGL to be successful?

is it 2% of turnover or 2% of tax on profit?

My money has more than doubled since January by NOT Being in BH. FWIW look at AVCT and AGL. These two companies look to have more potential in the next 12 months than BH does. Just my opinion, DYOR.