RE: Unhappy holder14 Dec 2021 08:15
It is a source of some amusement to me that I was labelled the "sealion" as some form of deliberately trolling and disrupting this BB originally by PL, for my stance on the likelyhood in my view, of the LFT missing its mark.
Now PL says:
" As I’ve said previously, forget the LFD. It’s farcical to suggest that, given ‘it’s one of the best if not the best’ (tm), but as you’ve pointed out wiggly it’s been over a year of false dawns. At some point you have to accept they’re an oncology business with a chance to get a bit of cash on the side to help with funding. Nothing more"
So as i say, it takes him a while but he tends to end up agreeing with my view.
Then Ripley (who unfortunately i have gotten under his skin, which I am sorry for, because once that happens, its hard to be objective), also states:
"my patience for the LFT vanished months ago. It’s now just a bonus in my mind."
(I would like to know which month given his continued denouncing of every post I make and only yesterday I was a "snidey rat" according to him for, wait for it.... expressing doubts about the LFT.)
So again, 2 of my biggest abusive detractors have come to the same conclusion as me.
Funny old world.