Member Info for wyndrum

Isn't there now a vaccine for cervical cancer that will cure 90-odd% of that cancer now? Basically eliminating it?

Why is there not an RNS saying that profits are expected to increase while we get spot prices for the tankers (plural that are leaving galactica every week?

My only conclusion is that there is no helium leaving the site. I just can't see any other explanation for 2 months of no RNS saying that money was at last coming in to both companies coffers.

Plus given the shortage of helium that the conflict has generated it seems even more pertinent than ever.

Its very strange.

I'm as patient as the next fellow but really... something smells off to me.

Thanks Touk, (I had forgotten about Trusts)

Touk 10% divis are pretty rare and are usually reduced very quickly I thought?

What examples can you give me of PLc's comapanies giving 10%?

Great, when was the last income generated by this? (and thanks)

AVCT, I thought Affimer was a diagnostic technology?

as every day is a school day, what income has been derived then from the therapeutic side?

Touk, I accept the distinction but unless the SP rises the dividends will not be forthcoming/rising.

If the SP falls the divi, sooner or later will be also fall.

It gets a bit circular/chicken and egg, but the SP will respond to the companies performance.

my view is the capital appreciation is a key part of divi increases that makes a lth so attractive.

you can't have one without the other but SP rises tend to offer better returns then just the dividend.

I don't know anything about any of it but didn't the milestone payments (and in fact any income that AVCT have ever had), has come from the diagnostic arm?

Chris, I have always wondered about the DX acquisitions.

Was it a prerequisite of getting money for the therapy side?

Remember the context is that diagnostics was worth $115b in 2024 and projected in 2030 to be $170b.

Given (at the time) avct was meant to have a great diagnostic arm then developing alongside companies already established looked to be a smart move and also potentially an insurance policy should the ava6k trial fail.

or it could be just that Dr Smith was not very good. (Again at the time the vast majority here idolised him in the same way CC is seen now.)

It just continues to highlight we actually know FA whats is going on at any given time.

Thats a good point well made.. :0))

BByour argument does not make any sense to me.

if there was a tanker on site on or before the 20th of Jan it must of been there to be loaded. If the posts here are correct and it takes a couple of days to fill a tanker then it should be abput 20 tankers plus worth.

Thats a lot of money for a loss making company. Also it would have been a milestone to report the very first tanker.

To assume (imo) that there have been lots of off loads as opposed to none seems less likely than my view of a hitch.

Well of course you won't engage W2 because it was a stupid and nonsensical post. And I know that because it never stops you "engaging" with me normally)

"Will make real. Investors rich"

oh, whats a "false" investor look like? One without shares...? well they would not be an investor at all, so you can't mean that

So, some sort of share holder who holds the shares but any SP rise will be struck off when they come to sell?

Brilliant. Did your trader friends tell you this is the way it works?

Well, I was taught by the trading desk of the Bank of America, so I guess its who you believe.

Its ALL about psychology. The "value" of any stock is simply a human construct. Further buyers only buy because they think the SP will rise, likewise sellers sell because they think the SP will fall. Nothing else matters

And thats it. Thats the ballgame.

This tentative break out is to see how the bears react.

if the bears slap this down then the bulls will retreat. but if there is little resistance then the bulls will buy more.

however that then might be a bear trap so as to lure more bulls in before bigger sells.

its who blinks first.

(I fins it enthralling... but thats me, others thinks its like watching paint dry....)

Where is the first tanker of helium from Galatica?

Its been weeks and weeks. I thought it was just a couple of days to fill one?

I have assume there is a problem that has caused this delay. (it was an rns on the 20th of jan that said the tanker was on site, 2 months ago!)

Now we wait to see if the breakthough holds.

Van, without knowing, but based on how misleading directors can be, that when good news is expected and then it goes silent for almost a year then, I would expect in this case, the design wins not to have been taken up into production.

If they have or good news is to be released then great, but even allowing for NDA's I don;t see why we could not have been told that the design win(s) HAVE resulted in production? They could rns the DS so why not the production?

Anyway its my somewhat cynical side jumping in but it is based on experience.

Lets hope this will be different.

Patience indeed HG, but one way or the other not long now I think.

At last something we have in common Tim.

I don't give a stuff about your mindless repetitive and non-insightful posts. (The very best you come up with is stating the bleedin' obvious but to have to wade through 20-30 posts of your very off humour hardly makes the wait worthwhile.

Still, thats just my opinion and although others have agreed with it in the past, you still keep going, so i guess whats good for you is just as good for me.