Member Info for wyndrum

Thanks van, well we can 50% for inflation since then.

I hope your patience more than pays off for you.

Joking aside van, this looks all or nothing to me.

If they have what they seem to have then one order will give them an annul profit. That 90m bar code order which as was pointed out won't need all to have capacitors but that was just one company. The PE will be at least 20 because of the likely growth as more orders and applications roll in.

Currently the mk cap is give or take £20m at .3p

a £20m profit (real broad brush stuff now), would equal £400m mc which would equal 6p

a paltry £100m profit would be 30p (and a PE ratio of 30-40 would not be actually that far fetched on a disruptive technology like this. so 60p a share sounds pretty good.)

Thats why I hope we don't get taken over too soon but its the same reason why we might/probably will.

22p

" Repeated postings of fabrications should not be allowed. That goes from false/misleading information to disruptive behaviour."

ok, seems fair enough.

What about the repeated lies that I have many alliasses here which is untrue and many know this having met DG at the recent london event?

What about all the constant personal abuse a number of posters dole out?

Ever reported them?

Why is that? Its ok for them to do all the things you want other posters banned for but some how the rules should be suspended for them.

The hypocrcisy is so rank that it defies logic.

Xbb. Just greed and fear at work.

This is still at phase 1 years away from commercilsation.

The posts here seem to think it will all happen later this year.

The point is bp will hopefully buy it and then do the very hard expensive lifting to get it to market while every year alternatives also come to market or become closer to market.

This all affects value to BP.

If chemo "cured" cancer and it was just toxicity then great but I for one am disappointed with the efficacy after 2 odd years of P1b that it is "just" 4 PR's.

and sgc is only used because there is standard care which is again great from avct's pov because there is a direct route for bp to see a market and therefore value the tech in more concrete terms.

However the fact that all the other cancer candidates have been dropped from p1b that do have alternatives treatments to me, is no coincidence.

So with more powerful drugs and dual payloads then still avct could be worth a great deal to someone.

Its just the time thing for me that will depress and is depressing ultimate value. (plus forward funding, of course.)

Now we are cooking... its now trading above .27p it will be key (short term) to hold this at close. The more it can go higher the better in terms of it sustaining these gains

I know all of this BV, so you can wind in your patronising tone.

I discuss avct from an investment pov. Part of this is the alternatives

If chemo is not universally helpful or predictable then it reduces its value.

This is compounded by alternative, non-chemo advances giving potentially better outcomes in the future.

If chemo is yesterdays treatment then again it reduces the value to BP having it.

Right now its great what avct are doing but time as always its passing by, time is now the most pressing element because take any time line you want but if say, in 10 years chemo will hardly be used then how much is avct worth with that effectiveness?

Every alternative chips away at its value, imo

Love did you read the link i posted explaining what these terms can mean?

Love, why then are the outcomes so different? some partial some minor and some less than that?

Previously chemo was hailed as a cancer destroyer but constrained by its toxic nature. Now the toxicity is removed it is begining to show maybe its limitations which were never seen due to the limited amount of doses available and assumptions were made that were false?

"It’s all about extending lives "

I'm not sure thats true in the way i think you mean it.

That may have been true 10/20/30 years ago. Now its ALL about CURING (emphasis) cancer

Things have moved on I think in expectation and why I keep banging on about time being so absolutely critical to AVCT. This never ending phase 1 trial is simply not going to move the dial. hopefully the latest trial will be quicker and more dramatic in its outcomes

13 out of 38 patients with minor or partial response suggest that the outcomes are not remotely universal.

It is safe for sure but if nothing else it is highlighting the patchy effects of chemo.

I think also it highlights why other non-chemo ways of combating cancer are being developed so quickly

Hmm, not earth shattering.

and there has just been released news on a pill that combats pancreatic cancer.

This latest trial needs to push the boat quite a bit further forward imo.

Good post Addicknt,

one of the major downsides with these bb's is that a "professional" view invariably will highlight risks and the assumptions made by some that are either flimsy or baseless. This then causes a knee-jerk reaction and personal rebuke.

On balance my view now id that these BB;s cause more financial harm than good. Many degenerate simply into any other social media outlet with all the negative connotations that come with them.

GF, buying at the top and selling at the bottom is the nightmare of all stock pickers.

You are going to sell (on the bell?) this morning. Yet that is the place I bought on Friday. and it is the same stock with the same prospects.

The SP always has 2 options and we can all, all make the wrong call but if you buy and sell reasonably frequently then I would suggest that always a plan should be in the head of the buyer.

Why am i buying now at this price? (The obvious reason is that you think it wont fall from here buy why? what reasons or indications do you have)

What price will I sell If it makes a profit and which price do I sell if I am wrong.

But deciding these things you will be able to see your potential loss and your potential gain and then with this risk reward you can maybe see if the bet effectively is worth taking.

Once you have a plan it is the start of removing the emotional fear and greed tap dance that dictates the actions of the majority of PI's.

The last part of the jigsaw is time, you have to have an idea of how long you will wait for the plan to work.

As an example if someone is a lth holder and they have been in a stock that for 5 years has only gone up 5% then that is a poor investment as you have lost 5 years of earnings time, and time, is the single precious commodity we all have in everything, including investment.

Anyway good luck.

Again fwiw, if holding a stock can be painful then it is an indication of being over committed. if you can get to a holding where the total loss would not hurt you at all, then you may find decision making generally becomes much easier and less concerning allowing rational thoughts to win the day.

Of course it assumes we would vote for a “cheap” takeover.

Maybe our biggest private shareholder wants Cpx to really capitalise on their tec? And would contest a low bid?

Of course it assumes we would vote for a “cheap” takeover.

Maybe our biggest private shareholder wants Cpx to really capitalise on their tec? And would contest a low bid?

Arti, " But no sane person would spend time talking/writing about a share they have no interest in. Altruism has no place here."

I would argue both points.

Sigh, MM's job is to keep an ordered market so as to allow trades to take place.

This is a volatile stock.

Some here might not care or understand or think TA has a role to play. Unfortunately the people who do are the big trading houses, So when it gets into over bought territory they start selling.

MM's eased the price up and then under pressure eased the price down allowing those who wanted to, to buy and sell easily within the range today.

No one has complains about MM manipulation when the SP ends the day up , do they? That should tell you something surely?