Member Info for wyndrum

Ophidian,

then why didn't Hurst say that?

It makes no sense because as I quoted back to you, 3 posts on friday he said the SP was going up (as he always, always, always does.)

For someone so smart he seems to have no conception the SP's can fall as well as rise.

So the rumour is that AVCt are in negotiation of some sort of offer and the SP falls on that news.... because what TW or whoever, has so much money they can manipulate the SP in the face of a potential offer (which in this bio pharma market would be likely billions), is swirling around?

Or are we talking just the possibility of an offer... which I think we have all had a stab at the topic for the last 18 months here....( Even I with my lack of woods and trees, I stated I thought it most likely to happen 12 months ago, "within 12-18 months")

Anyway, there is no insight you have that is any better or worse than most here. You seem to think that speaking opaquely somehow gives you a get-out-of-jail card when your thoughts don't match outcomes.

But I think your veil needs to be somewhat thicker and less diaphanous.

NY as you continue to peddle blatant lies I will remind you that at the time I was trying to think of alternatives as to why AS was taken by surprise at the request for further DE's.

I suggested that one might be given the huge sums of money at stake that BP might be trying to delay it.

Given BP have a track record of not playing by the rules (GSK was done for Bribery, Pfizer for fraud) then to me it seemed a possibility.

(My predictions here have served me very well thank you. As for the other 2 you mention, well the fat lady has not sung yet.)

Ophidian, rather than talk in riddles how about just answering the question?

It was not a trick question, but you stated that he was likely very clever, but all he has ever been is almost given hurst will predict daily the imminent rise of the SP , wrong.

Am I meant to reverse everything he says and do the opposite?

Given your expectations and predictions during the LFT period my "zooming out" prowess would seem to be fine thank you and possibly better than yours?

Ophidian

how do you reconcile the almost universal incorrect predictions from hurst over many months if not years, with your recent post saying :

"I know the preference on here is to posture, ridicule, court popularism and audition for stand up. But you REALLY should try listening to Hurst. I still haven’t managed to work out how he knows what he knows, ( I have a working theory and I suspect you are very clever...)"

I have previously highlighted 3 posts from Friday that are but the latest illustrations of his absolutely hapless performance.

"140-5 for size, afternoon pre Monday trade could easily push us through 155-60 and get all the Chartist excited."

that was posted on Friday.

"Monday the Market will struggle to control the opening price and if you chaps knows anything about a fast moving market and bid price higher than offer, well that is what you will see next week."

Also posted on Friday.

"You have 30 min left and that will be the last time you can get in at these prices"

Also posted on Friday when the SP was 139.5p At the moment it is 138.5p

After ophidian's intervention that this poster is somehow very clever and astute, it looks to me as though they are in collusion to either ramp the stock, or just having fun at the posters here expense on this BB.

In any event I for the life me, can't explain why so many here think this is ok yet go OTT elsewhere......

That has crossed my mind to over the years too.

However, the first thing is they have options so there is no real need to buy any.

From a perception pov when would they buy?

If they bought say, a year ago, the data was not conclusive so by buying then they would be telling the market that they "knew" something" that was not substantiated so that would not be ethical.

If they bought now, with the data available, then the market would go loopy and everyone would buy but to do that an RNS would have to come out at first and we are not quite there yet.

So the reason they never bought during LFT time was there were (imo) early problems (for whatever reason) commercialising the product.

Now with regards to the trial, as I think in the outline above, they could not buy without influencing the market and given their share options available, there is no need for them to purchase and potentially mis-inform the market.

(imo dyor etc)

Every journey starts with a single step......

A close above 12.75p would be the (promising) start then 15.75p.. (who cares about 16p now ha ha)... and then a close above17.25p etc etc

gla

Trek, its not key if I can't profit from it.

If volume is so great it means something then the SP has already gone...

On stocks, I just don't find it reliable enough to work with. (Maybe its just me...:0))

Maybe... but maybe the SP move will come first?

Morning Legal:

"The volume doesn’t appear to be here to sustain any meaningful rise at the moment."

From an indicator pov, I don't like Volume for the reason that by the time volume is high the SP has moved away, and does the acceleration in volume just mean punters are blindly jumping on board or is there substance behind the volume?

Basically volume will be low until it isn't

I have never managed to profit from it so binned it years ago.

3.3p still (to me) seems a significant figure for the SP to close above to trigger more buys. Dyor etc etc)

Clearly not as you responded.....ye gods, how do you manage to dress yourself each day?

Anyway. enough

I thought so, no answers.

You can bluster away all you like

total hypocrite.

I have not made up a single lie about AVCT. I have expressed my ideas and opinions for discussion on this BB.

I have been in fact generally positive about the company but disassociate the SP from the company

However I have had issues with what AS has stated and what has actually happened especially and particularly over the LFT years. His choice of words are too often vague or open to quite different interpretations. That is hardly news or limited to me.

As for ethics you will have to explain (but you won't because when it comes to actual reasoned argument you run away), why buying or selling a stock from a broker in a company has any effect on any persons health or Avacta's ability to carry on their research.

Because I would like to know why you bought shares in AVCT and why, when you eventually sell, you won't be like everyone else here including me?

Hypocrite

Why did you buy AVCT shares NYsize? Why didn't you just give the money to Avacta rather than a nameless broker.

You won't answer that though will you, just like the last time I asked you

What about my failed call that the LFT was not going to be a commercial success? You won't respond to that either will you.

Hypocrite

NYsize, so I made £20k a year average just on this one, single, stock over 3 years which you equate to Hursts posts?

Like the call I made at 102p back when the shares went up to 280p,

Like the call I i made here on selling from 256p downwards?

Like the buys I made when the Sp was in the 50's 60's and 70's.....

All a matter of record.

Quite why you feel the need to post a response to everything i post is somewhat obsessive.

Ok, this is less funny now: The (recent) high was on 8th of Feb this year when the SP was 185p

This is what Hurst posted on the 8th when the SP was 185p

"When you have size volume printed as sales, whilst the offer price is moving higher, tells you very clearly, that we will have a repeat of yesterday closing 15min, with nothing but sales tickets being printed, whilst offer price going higher and then we had proper size buying ticket post hrs.

Today with the same pattern being shown from 09.30, it tells us we will have proper buyer size tickets popping up prior to NY( now 05.00 AM ) opening.

We will most likely see prints going through at a price above current offer price.

My call on the price pre NY would be 188-92, however with the market now also understanding that we will most likely have a RNS out prior to Science day, as the company will have to update the market, because of the highly price sensitive material/updates potentially being presented by the company on Science day, we should see closing price today settling in the 90’ and comfortably closing around 200p by close of business on Friday.

Watch the offer price swiftly moving into the 90’."

The SP then declined from that peak, to 92p. a 50% loss.

Quite how anyone will be, based on his posts 30% up, is a fantasy because at no time has he ever predicted the SP would fall.

with the emergence of ophidian recommending Hurst as a very astute and intelligent poster, there is a likely a third option with a very crude attempt to try to influence readers here. It would also explain why every post is a new thread of the same title rather than a continuation, as a continuation of the thread would immediately highlight the inaccuracy and misleading content continually posted.

LSE, were you at the Mellow gathering? (forgot all about it, used to be a thing way back in the Motley Fool days when they had free BB's)

I can't be bothered to give any more examples but on the 7th of november when the SP was already 146p he said:

"Early buying and the 25/ buyer will need to pay above 150 very soon. Size buyer before midday is looking at 155-60"

It then fell from there every day since bar one.......

It does not wind me up any longer Tim, your 300 odd posts a month of utter banality have surpassed anything hurst attempts.

I just think it ironic that the vast majority of posts now are from people who get off being rude when not even mentioned let alone "attacked" and constant reactions to, for instance Hurst, and Sujood who thankfully posts less and less now , while at the same time decry the state of BB.

Virtually nothing is about AVCT any more. I wonder if the above has something to do with it.

Hurst is either not quite the ticket or just having some fun at this BB's expense. (For instance there is no record of where trades are placed, so to keep quoting New York confirms to me, that 1 of the 2 options apply.)

1 week ago the SP was 135.5p

1 month ago it was 134p

Basically its is being driven on PI's getting in and out. there a no size buyers

It is currently in a recent narrow trading range between 126p and 150p, or over a 3 month time line, 102p-160p

In the last 3 months there have been 13 peaks and 14 lows within that range.

There is no particular pattern withing the ranges .

The oscillations suggest there are quite a lot of "nervous" investors jumping in and out on rumour and speculation.

As the company has confirmed there will be a data release in Q4 it would be logical to think that as the end of Q4 looms, so more will take a punt and sellers will probably hold on causing a SP rise.

Still, its a great BB. Best on LSE