Member Info for Tyke68

Dear RKBeekeeper
I know you have alluded to this before about the Nobel prize but I believe this would still be nearly a year away according to the schedule https://www.nobelprize.org/nomination/physics/
So we would not get any worthwhile press coverage before then unless I am reading this wrong. Shareholders are leaving because of lack of news already.

I know you say you speak to FG does he understand private shareholders frustration at the lack of communication on test results? We just seem to be kept strung along with vague replies and no actual timeframes.

The May RNS talks about better communication but it seems they are deliberately ignoring most peoples questions even those not asking for what could classed as inside information.

Also what are your thoughts on Peter Fuhrman being China based which does not have access to 5nm technology. Surely we would prefer an NED who could access to the most advanced chips if we want to be the quickest. Intel has access to 5nm technology.

Thank you for your time reading this. Hopefully you can answer mine and other shareholders questions.

Reflection/Addisonshare
Thank you for clarifying this, appreciated

Good morning everybody

I wonder if people could help clarify why my initial post, last week, seems to have been deleted?

What criteria do LSE use for determine which posts they should delete?
Is it if it gets reported, if so why do they seem to let posts that are abusive stay?
Is it the company reads the post and doesn’t like it and asks for it to be removed?
I am a bit perplexed as to why they removed it, I have asked LSE but a bit like QBT I have not received a reply.

This was the message I posted, with a few minor edits, can anybody offer any advice what could have caused this to be deleted?

Thank you in advance and I hope everybody has a good weekend.

“What hard evidence do we have on what the company are actually working on?

We have had a few updates but nothing concrete with results or dates. Everything always seems to being delayed, results, patent etc. A patent was lodged previously but that was only for a 7% increase in speed I believe. We are constantly just being given little snippets but nothing tangible.

The value of the company seems to keep falling and no update ever appears to reassure shareholders. The recent court win has not benefitted shareholders, the only winner appears to be FG who will collect his 10%.

I know this is not what people want to hear but are we being used as a company by FG to just settle his old litigation matters?

Yes this is my first time posting.
Yes I do have shares in the company.
If you just want to call me a deramper etc then please just filter me.

It seems anybody who gives a different opinion is ridiculed by most posters but please just take a second to think what has the company actually achieved. Not what they say they are currently looking at or will hopefully achieve.

Surely the company have a date for when the independent verification of the testing results will be completed? Why not share this information? Nobody knows who the NDAs are with and people are just guessing. If it is for a 5nm chip then it can’t be with a Chinese company as they are currently blocked from such technology I believe. So our new NED who is based in China what is he adding to the company?

I would love to see this company succeed but they need to start being honest and upfront with shareholders and communicate far more. Until they do that can any of us be sure of what is actually happening with this company?”

Dear all

Has anybody ever had a reply from the company other than RBK? I don’t mean from CTW but actually the company. Addison I believe said FG reads this board, if this is the case why isn’t he doing something to reassure the shareholders?

We just need a date or a time span for the results to be released but the company seem intent to ignore any communication with shareholders. The question I would like to know is why are we being ignored?

Does anybody have any other email addresses they have had replies from?

Thank you

What sort of timescale do people envisage the independent verification to take.?
We know it had started in September, if not before, so should we get results before or after Christmas? The company seem unwilling to give an indication of when it could be.

Thank you in advance

Dear RhHh
Thank you for that info re CPX
As I have said I am novice at this and bow to people’s experience which is far more than mine.
Thank you

Suthy/RB
Thank you for the information, I think more open the conversations are the more people get the bigger picture which helps everyone.

Jambone, I assume you mean me when you say a new ID to tag team with. Sorry if I don’t adhere to your agenda but all I am doing is asking what I believe are relevant questions. As I said previously please just block me like some have done already. I am not here to cause trouble as I want the company to succeed as much as anybody on the board.

Thank you

Suthy thank you for your replies, it is appreciated. You say you worked in the industry so I don’t know if you can help with this question, if they knew how long it took for the company to get their results will it take less or a longer time for the results to be verified? If so surely we then have an approximate date when the results can be released by?
Thank you once again for you help

I revert back to my question from yesterday how do we know this is happening without hard evidence?

Dear all

Thank you for all your responses to my question I think it is worthwhile to hear other peoples varied thoughts on the situation. It seems we are all just wanting to know what the results are and the company are not giving us any indication of when these will be released.

It seems the vast majority of shares in the company are held through nominees accounts like HL so I am guessing these are private shareholders invested via ISAs and SIPPs etc like myself.

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations/aim-rule-26

I wonder if the company would treat large institutional investors like it treats us private investors with regards lack of communication?

So here is my other question, would we as a group be treated differently if we acted collaboratively?

Everybody says how AIM companies can do what they want but why do we let them? I know there are far more knowledgeable investors on this board than me and maybe one could inform us if we owned over 5% of the company as a group could we ask for an EGM?

https://www.companylawclub.co.uk/calling-general-meetings

The questions I personally would like to ask are:

What were the unverified results, even if we could only be told 10% quicker etc?
By what date will these results be verified?
How will these be used to create wealth for the company and by what date will this start to happen?
Are we not looking at far superior 5nm chips because our NDA is with a Chinese company or our prospective chip manufacturer is Chinese and if so surely this goes against our aim of being the quickest.

I am not suggesting a shareholder revolt just could we work collaboratively to finally get some answers to our questions and put everybody’s mind at rest. The company and advisors seem to ignore all request for information except CTW who is always polite enough to reply but he can only say what the company tells him?

I know there are some very experienced and knowledgeable investors on this board and at the risk of sounding like a complete novice why can’t we work together to get answers to our question?

Thank you for all your time reading this and my last post it seems to me everybody is just frustrated by the poor communication from the company.

All the best and have a good weekend.