We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
One course of action if you want to go down the legal route would be a Derivative Rights Action.
HarChris - "Well i'm certainly glad it's institutions only."
I would hardly call Shard an Institutional Investor. All they do is write a ticket and sell on to their retail clients. My understanding is they were in for about £2.2m of the placing. By the time that's been split down into average £5k chunks all you have is another load of leaky holders who won't hang around too long.
“Members of the public are not eligible to take part in the Placing.”
I think that shows the contempt held for smaller shareholders. It's not difficult to put a corporate action out and give existing shareholders the option to subscribe if the will of the advisors & company is there. Share certs too, probably to stop any short term flippers!
They are hardly going to state publicly that there is a need to raise money. Take your BLINKERS off and show some objectivity!
Seems £60K -£70K is meaningful. Personally I would have thought SPAngels a better home for a resource company.
Further dilution to pay suppliers?
When’s the placing then?
If they are not prepared to back themselves at this price why should anyone else.?
Lifestyle company end of.
Just like to dip in and out and expose certain posters for the frauds they are.
FYI, I think Seis has good intentions, probably blinded by his investment. Fulmar on the other hand, I and others can see right through him. Unsophisticated ramper, that's all he is.
Anyway, as I said long flight tomorrow so catch up on Friday.
For what it's worth, I think the Board are strokers, it's a lifestyle company.
It's pleasure but I / we will be in business!
Seis - Proof of paid derampers or another round of Fake News?
One could say you blinkered vision of this company's share price..................
OK, you do that Simone. why don't you calm down, pick some muscles and cogitate.
I have a 12 hour flight tomorrow, FYI, anyone who posts between 14.25 and 02.45 isn't me. Don't want to burst your bubble but I have only one username here.
And as I said, Directors put the money up and I might follow.
Hold on, actually, would probably need a more effective Non- Exec too but that's another story?
And to add, once the Directors back themselves with cash, I would consider investing. They need to put the cash down first though.
OK, so now you have just hit the nail on the head. There is no guarantee of a tier 1. However, take a look at the underwater boys who have been spouting this is a tier 1 asset.
I rest my case.
Simon? Probably bed time. Let's pick this up after your paper round in the morning.
Sorry thick lad Simon, I was typing when your post was published and never saw it. My opinion is that there historically some good results on certain cores but don't think there is enough there to confirm a Tier 1 deposit. What do you think?
Sorry, Simon-opinionless. Spell check has a way of embarrassing people.
Now young man. What's the question?
Wow, don't you have anything else in your life!
Travelcard, is my only username. Not sure I could say the same for you though!
What was Sies's question?
Actually, Fulmar, I would suggest you are a bitter current holder. You are underwater here, you know that, I know that, the posters on this board know that. Let's face it, you haven't had the outcome you bought into. Do I feel sorry for you, no. But hey, ho! your money, your choice.
I'm probably a bit "too straight forward" with my assumption but my assumptions are obviously correct.
Simon-opionless - What was the question?
Simonpee - "None of you boys like answering a straight question, how much did you lose" For me nothing, never owned a share in this stock.
I will answer a straight question and would consider buying in after the directors do. What's your question?