Member Info for Travelcard

On this board. If it ain’t positive and blowing smoke up certain pieces of anatomy. It is most definitely a crime to have an opinion. Kool aid anyone?

It’s only relevant if you have any. Probably more copper in my car than ARC have extracted

Keep supporting the BoD Fulmar, whilst stroking your losses.

Other shareholders want change.......

My guess is they are trying to thrash out a deal. 1.5p per share should do it. Roughly 30% premium to current share price.

Friday evening dilemma. Do I unfilter Simontheaggressiveclown to read his post.......

The thing I wonder about here is that the headline points of the JV have been disclosed, and quite rightly so. However, there might also be conditions within the contract that possibly inhibit the delivery of those headline points. Due to commercial sensitivities, the JV agreement in its entirity will not be disclosed publically.

Due to the lack of newsflow re the JV, I wonder if something has gone awry?

The pen is mightier than the sword.

Thats because he is balls deep in this share. His musings are far from balanced.

Because Fulmar told him it will. LMAO

B750 - It will. Just a matter of time.

BOD playing the long game. It’s a lifestyle company.

Directors need to pay the options money back and carve out the JV, no need for them to take more than a peppercorn salary from the JV. Leave all the cash in the business and distribute as a dividend.

I suppose in the first instance the equity in the shell will get completley smashed. Whats a listed shell with more liabilities than cash worth. £50K - £100K.

Existing shareholders will probably get dluted out of sight.

It's amazing how the Directors / PDMR can use "dilutive impact" as a reason for taking nearly £3.5m (6.94p per share) out of the company and then add to the dilution at 1.8p. Only one small group of winners in this trade.

And the usual clowns come on here and back the BoD. All that is happening here, is that the BoD are further strenghtening their positions as Directors, making it harder to displace them. They will continue to have their snouts in the ARC trough, whilst presiding over deminishing shareholder returns.

They should return some, if not all of the options money, If that £3,474,179 hadnt been taken out it is unlikly there would have been any need for the 1.8p placing.

Scandalous.

"NVS put his hand in his pocket at 1.8p" - Do you really mean he invested some of the options money the directors ripped out of the business at 6.94p?

And then bought into a placing at 1.8p. The Directors should return ALL the money they took out at 6.94p.

March 2021

Arc Minerals announces that 75,837,378 share options have been surrendered by a number of persons discharging managerial responsibility ("PDMR"). The Company has taken that decision to reduce the potential dilutive impact which would arise from the exercise of share options in order to optimise the potential upside of its value per ordinary share of the Company.

The share options, further details of which are set out below, are currently exercisable at a profit.

In lieu of this surrender, the share option holders will be compensated in line with the Black-Scholes fair value model, using a 10-day VWAP of 6.94p through cash and / or shares to be issued at the Company's discretion to a total value of £3,474,179 ("Consideration"). It remains the Company's priority in respect of the surrender of options not to issue further shares to management thereby avoiding diluting shareholders' interests.

Tiger16.

Lets break down your post.

• Accepted into AWS Activate (Amazon) - So what? - There are hundreds of thousands of companies in this program. It is a way AWS get companies to utilise Amazon Web Services cloud platform. Call it AWS marketing.

• Accepted into Atlassian for Startups. Here is the criteria ;

Your company must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for Atlassian for Startups:

- Your company is not an existing Atlassian paid customer

- VC funded or associated with a partner accelerator and/or incubator

- Have not raised more than US$10 million in external funding

If your company meets the criteria above, you are eligible to apply for Atlassian for Startups and, if approved, you get included Atlassian Cloud products for $0 for 12 months for up to 50 users, except for Jira Product Discovery, which includes 10 free creator users and unlimited contributors.

Basically, a start up program offering free hosting. BIG DEAL!!!

MY QUESTION - No VC funding. Why?

• Accepted into the Nvidia Inception Program (a club for future AI leaders) - This has basic qualification criteria.

"To qualify for membership, your company needs to:"

- Employ at least one developer

- Maintain a working website

- Be officially incorporated

- Be less than 10 years old

HARDLY GROUNDBREAKING!

"Even if Alludium reaches just a £500m valuation, that’s £41.5 million attributable to CTAI."

Alludium will need to raise bucket loads of cash to get to a £500m valuation.

- CTAI does not have the capital to stand its corner, It will need to raise money. YOUR RATIONALE is FLAWED. The dilution to take up its pre emption rights (if you know what they are?) will be vast.

Let that sink in!

An 8.3% shareholding in a business that at this point doesn't have a marketable product. Take away the Catenai Plc costs. You have not much more than a gamble and a future keep the lights on placing.

Bargepole.

.2's very much incoming.

This is a bargepole job.

They are only enrolled in start up programs. The AWS one is nothing more than a way that Amazon sell their data hosting services. I've been involved with a few companies that have been in these types of programs. Certainly not worthy of an RNS. This is becoming more of a joke by the day.

Thats all very well Fulmar. But can you shed some light on the JORC reports? You seem to be very well informed.

In Fulmars world everyone has to agree with him. The fact he and a few others have contiuously called out anyone with a contray opinion to theirs is risible. Never once thought to consider that an alternative opinion could be the right one.

Lets face it, the stock hasn't gone the way they wanted it to go. Theres an old stockmarket saying, the market will always find the true valuation. Sadly for them they are currently on the wrong side of it.