Member Info for testpack3

Oh dear swaz. Disn't bother to read your Magnum Opus, but will remind posters of your misinformation and false statements. You posted a year or so ago ' my most honest and trustworthy friend, Bob'. This is the guy who used a fake PhD inhis avatar on this board, DrAnomoly, and when questioned, confirmed it was a PhD issued by a NZ Uni. All false. When he was rumbled, with you, went to ANO group and uses H2Hoo. lol. Now suggesting he is some kind of expert on H2. lol. I have asked both you and The fake, many times for your comment on this misinformation, with the objective to deceive people. In itself illegal if done for monetary gain. Probably why he renamed himself. lol. So swaz, never mention my avatar again when talking about honesty. You are the architect of misinformation on this, and many other boards.

'Tril of Akhnos' sounds like its a leading character in Game of Thrones. Should have been.

Hi StIves

Fischer Tropsch is not the feedstock, it is the process. Most fuels used by Germany in WW1 were made from F-T, with the Syngas, ( COx and H2 produced from coal). This would not be acceptable for SAF under present guideline since the feedstock is a FF. Plastic is a FF derived material, and hence would not qualify as SAF. AF derived from plastic is a much better option than the C intensive Kerosene used at present. I have messaged Paul and asked for clarification.

Avioxx is a Private ltd Company, and it is worth noting that 2 'start up' SAF cos have gone bankrupt over the past few years. It will be interesting to see if Avioxx applies for an IPO ( a listing), or better still, if PHE takes it over.

The 'report' detailed by Bob ( who used a fake PhD to ingratiate himself with BOD members), and swaz ( lives on Fantasy island) was AI generated, as shown in the preamble. Using Syngas from DMG to produce SAF has a serious problem. The Authorities responsible for the SAF to be 'mixed' with JetFuel, stipulated that the SAF produced must be from non-FF based feedstock. Plastic is FF based. I did write to Paul last Sept highlighting the vast market for SAF, and would the upcoming trials include the manufacture of Kerosene. ( JetFuel). I did note that Avioxx state on their website, that C capture would be used in an advanced Fischer-Tropp reactor to produce Liquid hydrocarbons. Not sure if this would be classed as SAF. I have again messaged Paul for clarification. This problem would be negated if the feedstock was Bio-Mass ( EQT now rely solely on Bio-Mass feedstock for their operations.). I did ask Paul if a trial with Bio-Mass feedstock was planned at Bridgend. No reply to date.

Aghmir. Re; yr post

What happened.? Is the Govt overthrown.? has PM resigned? Was there carnage in the streets?

Red. Yes, the DMG can handle other feedstock, and I have already alluded to the mfr of SAF using Biomass as a feedstock, and this would then qualify as 'green' SAF. So, do you think the present trials will include other feedstocks.?

Plantdad. You could not miss the posts from Swazers, and C'paul, after the patent was granted, and the 'massive' uplift to sales it would bring. Just proves that posts from both those individuals should be ignored. But, I believe, it is a mistake not to at least mention waste plastic. It could have read 'The Treatment of Waste Plastic and other Waste Material..

There are cos and individuals who scour Patent Applications for investment research, and also to identify new 'disruptive' technology. I'm afraid the headline on PHE patent will not attract any attention. There are hundreds of sites already treating waste material. Just my opinion.

The concerning line ( besides the misspelling of Apparatus) is 'The Treatment of Waste Material'. This is not going to attract the attention that we all want for DMG. What is wrong with the 'Treatment of Waste Plastic and Tyres'.

I can imagine there are oodles of patents for treatment of waste. Disappointed.

Yes AJ, I thought I might need to expand. It is irrelevant to this debate, what The Kingdom want in the future, the situation now is this, EML has a mining license for a mine at Khemiset, so there is more than one mine, hence EML's mine is A mine, It would n have been better not to pursue the debate, and leave me, and others, in some doubt as to your level of stupidity. Now, you have removed all doubt. I believe you will make my proposition a cast iron certainty with your reply.

Ahh, AJ27, it's your English language that is the problem then. Would have been linguistically correct to say, 'a mine is' not 'the mine is'. I trust that I do not have to explain, and expand on this further.

Dral

PHE have moved their focus away from DMG to produce H2, to accommodate a much larger, varied market, by focusing on Syngas production from DMG, leaving it to the customers to decide how to use the product, and eliminating waste plastic/tyres from the environment. A quick Google search will show you the different methods to produce H2 from syngas. We have to rely on the figure given to us by PHE, that 20 tonnes plastic waste feedstock, will produce 2 tonnes of H2. Some time ago, I calculated that about 9 tonnes of Syngas was produced from 20 tonnes feedstock to produce the 2 tonnes H2. Would need verification from PHE

Shearclass.

'@testpack, I'd love to know how anyone gauges whether or not a government is 'worried' by an individual dispute?'

Well, I'll take a stab in the dark and suggest to you, that if you are 'worried' about something, you will take some action to alleviate those concerns. I know that I , and many, would. If are not 'worried'. you will do nothing, as appears to be the case in The Kingdom.

It has been mentioned on this board many times, that although this is an 'individual' dispute, it may have serious ramifications for the credibility of The Kingdom as an Investment Area. I hold the opinion, that, in time, these 'arguments' tend to 'blow over'.

AJ27

'.You do understand that the mine is already being built by OCP?'

'

Really. Good news for EML then since it holds the mining license, and this is a clear breach of contract.

I remain with this nagging thought that The Kingdoms Authorities, dealing with this, must be relaxed with their position. With litigation coming in the next few months ( hopefully), and no sign of any 'let's have a chat', coming from them, they must be sitting there and saying 'bring it on'. I know many on here think that Hayden 'walk on water', I have not been overly impressed with him. Especially handling the water supply problem. Will EML use the same 'handbook' as always, and not release any information on the details of the prosecution of the case.?. I would have thought all details should be in the Public domain?

For any investment on The Kingdom, the driving force for companies will be profit. Any Company will think, 'it will not happen to us'. Everything blows over. Morocco isn't worried.

I am afraid it is just another 'day at the office' for AIM BOD. To enrich themselves at every available opportunity, even in the midst of a 'dog fight' . And for good measure, the 'secured litigation costs' also includes cash for ongoing payment of BOD wages, pension pot payment and perks. Never miss an opportunity. I wonder if any of them have a look at themselves in a mirror, and ask 'is there anything I could have done different so as to avoid this conflict'? Well for a start guys, what about releasing all of the minutes of meeting with all relevant bodies. In the past, you have kept these 'secret' as to honour the agreement with bodies that 'disclosure' is not an option. I believe that is no longer relevant.

The PHE uneducated are out in force, again. Why are people invested in a Company, and have little idea what it doea, or what it's main 'value' is. A quick read of PHE website, has always included the following statement:

'DMG operates in the absence of air'

Burning is with an oxidising agent being present, such as air. The furnace is heated indirectly, with heat being transferred. It is basic heating technology.

Wishing everyone a Peaceful, Healthy and Wealthy 2025

Wishing everyone a Peaceful, Healthy and Wealthy 2025

Wishing everyone a Peaceful, Healthy and Wealthy 2025

Wishing all posters a Peaceful, Healthy, and Wealthy New Year.

Follows is a post from Sept,24 re; above;

18 Sep 2024 15:08

If it is true, then OCP spending $100m on pipeline from Coast shows the seriousness of the water shortage problem. This could and should have been on the cards for EML 2, 3 years ago.!. It is called Risk Assessment Management. In Jan '22, Reminex was awarded a pre-construction design contract. A leader in their field (!). The first item on their agenda, copied from the RNS;

'The scope of works included covers the following packages:

- Package 1: Water supply solution to mine site.'

Obviously this firm has no credibility whatsover. Drought conditions had already started in Morocco at this time, and GW was a major talking point, everywhere. Except of course at Reminex and EML.

Capex at this time was 'sold to us' as a 'low cost' Capex mine. From memory, around $350M. We were also told various Banks had signed MOU to offer the cash. The FS of mid '20 stated EBITDA of $300Mpa, and a Cash payback period of under 3 years. If a budget had been done for a Coast pipeline, it would have been less expensive than now ( presumably). And, of course, allowing EML to sell surplus potable water to whoever. KMP would have bettered those forecasts Some on here may remember when 'water' became the problem, I suggested either a Desal plant at Coast, or at site, and pipeline the water, or even, as a last resort, Bowser the water to site. Bowsers with 6000 gallon capacity can be used, and since the mine already has license for HGV movements, this should present no problem. It can still do that now.

The only solution that appears to be on the cards now is a deal with OCP. Either as a JV, or T/O. But if I were OCP CEO, I would just sit and wait for the 'firesale'. One coming to your area soon. Guarantee, if the latter happens, Graham would be on OCP Board.

What is certain, from RNS to date, that the only 'solution' to water supply was the use of 'grey water', if indeed that was a Reminex idea. What is certain, is that 'drought in Morocco' was not discussed and meaningful solutions put forward. . In a reply to Ideas, the following day I posted this;

'Your comments re; the 'ownership' of Reminex, only reinforces any argument that subterfuge is at play here. Obviously, The King and senior members of the Court, will have been well aware of the drought conditions, and the effects of a prolonged drought in 20122. . When 'water supply solutions was the first item on Reminex agenda fro their 'Basic Engineering' contract, it is unbelievable that alternatives to Dam water supply, were not even mentioned. Reminex must have known that relying solely on 'waste water recycling' would be insufficient, ( which wasn't mentioned in their final report), especially with the fact that OCP already had Coastal Desal plants working. !!!'

This is probably a key debating point for the prosecution of this case.