Member Info for testpack3

Patxaran. yr post;

'I’m trying to be positive but I can’t help thinking this looks like an exodus.'

It started after CMD. sp on CMD c1.0p, now almost 50% down. Why? S/H think CMD was a flop. 'Hot' commissioning of the plant began in January. CMD was c9 weeks later. The Company must have fed waste plastic through the kiln, produced Syngas, and at least, recycled same for even a short period. This is what 'hot' commissioning is. Why oh why , didn't the Company use CMD to demonstrate this. Oh dear swaz, has posted many times ( or rather AI0 that DMG has been independently validated.!. More falsehoods. Again, no proof given. CMD would have been an ideal time to 'run' the plant, on a 'typical' waste plastic mix, if only for 2/3 hours after zone temperatures achieved, obtain gas samples, and have them analysed. CMD has left most of us with more questions, than answers. I believe this explains the drop in sp. I thought CMD would be a 'glowing' demo of DMG, followed by a 'ramping' RNS. based on that, I bought pree-CMD. Luckily, I sold 2 days after. I still retain my 'core' holding, more in hope, that BOD is not taking us for fools. I have written to Paul expressing my disappointment with CMD. No response I'm afraid. He could have given me reasons for not demonstrating DMG on a complete cycle, but chose not to.

The last few posts encapsulate the problem. Lack of information from BOD. It cannot be a State Secret the grounds for Arbitration. EML, obviously have to inform The Defendant, so nothing EML RNS's to S/H ( we own the Company) is secret or confidential. Lack of information is the prime cause of hostile debate.

Your comment is full of falsehoods. The case is going to Arbitration because there is a structure in place which allows that.

BIT. BIT lays out, in general, reasons why a company can see fit to litigate.

This is also an interesting comment you make;

.Morocco could have refused the ESIA, but they would still be liable to pay damages after ICSID Arbitration' !!

Please explain how Morocco could have been taken to Arbitration if it has refused EML the EIA? The Kingdom had been in drought conditions for several years, and had proposed 2 'solutions'. Using Recycled waste Water, and SMP (?) process. It certainly appears, but with EML Board not known for informing S/Hs, that the issue of EIA has not been rejected, but The Kingdom has the final say on what it's environment needs in the way of water, not an International arbitration panel. It would have been up to EML, if EIA refused on water usage grounds, to present an empirical fact based study, on why the decision is wrong. If still refused, then BIT would probably be the remedy, under the heading of EML being misled. This last sentence does not support your comment that damages could be awarded for EIA refusal, since, to S/Hs knowledge, EIA has not been refused, and there has been no detailed information from either party on water consumption in the mine locality. FWIW.

Rivaldo. yr comment;

'Interesting that at that point they see REAT as having £1.1m net cash, i.e allowing for another earnings-enhancing acquisition.'

Interesting that the Company had £1.8m cash last FY results. Now, £1.1. perhaps 'punters' and MMs see a cash raise coming. And I believe it still owes money for acquisitions.

When do you envisage Dowgates £1.20sp. ?

Castle, yr post;

'Not forgetting our patents around the kiln

Using the syngas created to heat the kiln and the use of the heat .'

The patent is not for recycling Syngas, it is for the temperature control in various zones of the Kiln.

You still do not comprehend this do you?

Also, Ineos plant is for recycling waste plastics, to reform them into new raw materials for plastic production. The important part is the elimination of waste plastic from the environment. DMG also performs this benefit, but with a Syngas product, rather than high quality raw plastic material. The big question commercially, is what is worth more, Plastic in it's raw form ( Polymers), or Syngas. The Ineos project is technically sound. and works, however, , with months of planning available for PHE CMD, 50 investors did not see waste plastic being fed to the Kiln, or the Syngas re-cycled. The fall of 50% in the sp since CMD tells us non-attendees all we need to know. The quality of the buffet and accoutrements of Directors is not of commercial interest to many on here, only 1 or 2 I suggest.

99, I think you are wrong, and Thorpe is correct. There has been no RNS from EML saying Committee refused EIA. The case going to arbitration is because EML believe the Govt has misled ( lied) it. We have to wait and see what the actual charges against The Govt are. It might well be about water, or a myriad other things. I have no doubt that the letters OCP will appear in the formal charge. Watch this space in, say, 3 months. may be.

Patxaran.;

'When things here start to become real here and the price plummets we never hear anything from Swazers.'

This is a fact, yes, but I would also add, that he has been caught out in so many deceptions, and lies in his AI posts ( he doesn't really understand how it works), and has been asked many times now for proof of many of his statements. He, or rather AI, has no proof, and he probably realises now, that every statement he makes, he will be asked for proof.

I see, as of today, that Jancux is now using AI generated posts. C'mon guys and gals, us your own grey matter.

Ryder.

Do not elevate the opinion of yourself by thinking I am upset with you.

I, and a few others posted the timeline re; the arbitration timeline, ie notifying opposites of board members it nominates, etc, etc. It was not going to be 'months' before news broke of a decision. Some of the posters on here know the MO of EML on issuing substantive RNS. We are cognisant that no RNS will be issued to 'keep us up to date'. Hence, come back next year, not on months. Posters, like you, who have an interest in 'distressed companies' can find much more relevant info. on them other than this message board.

I only peek in here occasionally to see if EML have 'x'd something, it has 'previous' for it. I am not on 'x'.

Castle, yr post;

'Lots of unknown trades cancelled.'

These are not 'unknown' trades. When you see a 'sell and buy' of the same amount, at the same time, it is a probably a 'Bed and ISA' trade. Investors, before the start of a new financial ( tax) year, want to transfer their ordinary share holding into a tax efficient holding, such as an ISA, or any other 'tax' efficient investing platform. Naturally, these investors see a bright future for the sp, with CGT implications.

' for months I mean....'

I did suggest, shortly after the litigation process was finalised. 'news' would arrive in 2026.

The Fake Dr posted a 1000 word eulogy stating that DMG was unique in its ability not to be compromised by 'tar' build up in its treatment of waste plastics.' Oh dear swaz' then further enhanced this diatribe with a 2000 word post saying this 'tar' problem caused the cancellation of a £2B Air Liquide project on Teeside for the treatment of waste products. In previous posts 'oh dear swaz' had stated that PHE was being 'shorted'. I and others asked for the proof of this. None came. I requested 'oh dear swaz' to post the 'link' for the 'tar' problem causing the cancellation of a £2B contract. To date, none has been forthcoming. Can this mean that 3000 words have been perverted needlessly.? I await.

' Research and Development (£150k) - Continue work on development of alternative outputs from DMG i.e. Liquids, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), etc as well as adding additional equipment to the feedstock testing unit (FTU) process to prove at scale'

I e-mailed Paul Nov last year, suggesting SAF production, albeit with Bio-mass feedstock, rather than waste plastic. His reply was essentially that DMG , for the 'foreseeable future', would only produce Syngas, leaving customers to further refine if required.

The above quote from the RNS, although welcome, gives me concern that the Company now realises that CMD was a damp squib, and the fund raise was taken before further deterioration in the sp. There is the distinct possibility that new avenues for DMG, which is contrary to the 'only Syngas production' MO of the Company, is a short term fix in an attempt to bolster sp.

It also lays out a 'conflict of interest'. PHE has said it is in negotiation with Avioxx to supply 2 DMG units to them for the mfr of SAF. If PHE also mfr, it would be a competitor, and able to produce SAF much cheaper than Axioxx. . The cos could however, since there is a insufficient SAF capacity at the present time, 'price fix' ( illegal), to enable adequate profitability for Avioxx, and a very profitable income stream for PHE.

The Company management has again, proved itself' wanting' in forward thinking of what should be a momentous time in it's history. It needs further cash to invest in RnD. FFS PHE, DMG is more than 10 years old. WTF have you been doing.

from the clown prince of charting ( i like it marquis) in another misinformation opus magnus.

'4️⃣ “we are all in agreement that dmg is the way forward.” this was my comment)

📌 rebuttal: if this troll truly supported phe, they wouldn’t be shutting down legitimate discussions about how the technology works.'

lol. no-one on this board has posted more technical information on dmg than i have, you fool swaz. for the 100th time, my criticism is of management. not dmg, as proven by cmd. had the ceo s of veolia or biffa been in attendance, would that day have inspired them to buy. definite answer, no.

your stupidity made a comment that 'the rapid cooling prevents tar formation'. this is bx. any gas when cooled will first form a liquid ( except c02, which goes straight to a solid phase, sublimation.). further cooling will produce a solid. you obviously need further education on this, and i suggest reading up on fractionating towers in the manufacture of liquids (to include petrol, diesel, tars and solids from gasified crude oil. your nonsense post was about how tar stopped a £b air liquid project in teeside.. i have a little knowledge of the process used, since in essence it is a blast furnace ( get your ai on that), which is used in the steel making industry. it is the first process, which produces liquid iron from it's raw material, iron ore. very quickly, a large rotund tower is filled with the ore, quality coke, and initially heated from the bottom, until the coke provides additional heat. at c 1500dc, the molten iron separates and filters down though the coke/iron ore mixture. the noxious c gases are removed from the top of the furnace. if you live in asteel making town'city, you will be familiar with the red glow in the night sky from a blast furnace. oxygen lance is used to increase temp. and liquify other compounds, which 'float' on top of the iron. this is ****. when the furnace is ready to be 'tapped', the )2 lance is used to burn through a clay bung at the base of the furnace, and the molten 'pig iron' flows out, in a firework display of sparks. a sight worth seeing, and a very dangerous operation. fi, this iron, again when heated in an oxygen furnace , using again, an oxygen lance to remove impurities, and c, to make the iron malleable ( steel). stainless steel is made using the same process, with the addition of chromium.

now to the main point, this type of blast furnace has been widely used throughout the world to treat solid waste containing plastics. i do not think the teeside plant was designed solely for waste plastic, but it is the first i have heard that 'tar' caused the cancellation of this £b project. can you kindly provide the source for this information of tar causing the cancellation? i , and others have given up on you providing proof of 'short' selling of phe swaz, so, please do not disappoint me, again.

This board, thanks to the input of the newbie, Rider, has become a discussion group for identifying distressed companies, who have seen fit to prosecute the governing bodies of various countries. Yes, it's pertinent to EML in that we are a distressed company, but I am sure Rider knows a better, and more informed Forum for these type of companies. Please divulge it Rider, and hopefully, if you have any input on here, it will be on EML. It will be a long wait.

Oh Dear swaz. many on here are still waiting for your proof of PHE being 'shorted'. Can't your AI find it. lol. Swazers, the bringer of lies, lies, and more lies. So many lies. Are you a PutinPuppetTump supporter? You use his MO.

Oh dear swaz. . You gave Moab a grilling, One of the many on here at the end of your AI posts, Get educated and use your own brain cells to debate. A possible reason that the 'tar' issue has not been debated on this board, is because it is a non-issue. No RNS from PHE ( in case you do not know, the owners of the DMG process), on the problems associated with tar in the furnace, and solutions to overcome the problem. The only information on 'tar' substance the company has issued is that the products of the DMG process include a solid 'char', which is saleable. This char is obviously a a mixture of very long chain polymers, which when the Syngas is cooled, produces a solid mass. Your previous nonsense gave a misleading comparison of DMG and furnace incineration of waste products to include plastic material. As PHE s/hs we are all in agreement that DMG is the way forward, and infinitely better then 'burning' waste materials, even with C capture.

Moab;

You say it was a c n p from a Longspur article, and why didn't swaz attribute it to the source?

He Did.! Unfortunately, it was to his mate the Fake dr, now posting under H2h000, who posted it on Wednesday, this week. I know, it's laughable. What oh dear swaz can't do however, is reply to my post debunking all his nonsense posts.

Oh dear swaz. You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer are you? With your inability to reply to my posts, showing 2 glaring examples ( of the many) of how false and misleading your AI generated posts are. ( You have to use AI, because you do not have natural intelligence to debate). You are in a hole, and instead of trying to get out, you ask for a mechanical digger, and you are now buried alive. Oh dear.

I believe the CMD was not what we were, as owners of the Company, were expecting. It was a drab affair, with no 'new' information. The market has given it;s reaction. Your diatribe on 'shorting' was laughable, you even gave the main reason it is a 'non shortable' share. It is a low MC company. !!! Duuh. Where is your evidence of shorting? You tell lies. Your 'Debunk' is so full of misinformation, disinformation it is tiresome to reply. However, the best bit of info' from your lyingswaz post was this;

'📢 Next time you see a post like this, ask yourself: is this analysis, or an agenda? The answer is clear.'

What are our agendas? I know yours, it is to promote and sell your nonsense chart business on here and other forums. My agenda. Make money. I am invested in PHE, with now only a fraction of what I have held in the past ( over 2 million shares). I have been here longer than you, i know more about PHE and DMG than both you and your fake DrAnomoly pal. I have posted many times about the need, both environmentally, and commercially, for widespread DMG use. My main criticism has been of managements. The first notable debacle being the 'schoolboy error' to award Peel ( mainly a real Estate developer), the contract, not only for exclusive rights to build DMG in the UK, but the first one. We all know what happened. You do don't you swaz? Both you and the fake lauded the Peel agreement. Duuh.

I gave my opinion yesterday on what I believe the CMD should have done.

I'll ask you swaz, what your first share purchase was, and what year? Should be a laugh. Mine was a medium sized housebuilder, but listed. It's owner was an affable, rotund guy, who regularly drank at my local in the Midlands. This was early 70's. He gave away one night that his company was the subject of a 'shell' TO. I borrowed some money, and bought. I made a lot. I bought a 4 bed house, with2 acres., and bought some BP shares. I insider trading, No, just a hunch on gossip from a drunken builder. You couldn't debunk a child in the upper bunk of a double bunk bed. Without, of course, some artificial help. Looking forward to your next 'Mad' magazine rant.

All of the attendees at the CMD who posted here, gave glowing reports, some from the usual culprits, were exuberant. The market has given its opinion of the CMD. Down over 20% since the day. No doubt, some on here will be saying it is a Bear Market because of the sell off in USA, caused by Trump initiating trade wars with most major players. True to a certain extent, but the USA markets are not down 20%. I can say with some confidence, that had the CMD been what most on here were expecting, ie; quantitative details of production over an extended run, using different feedstocks, details of running costs etc,etc. Running costs, since the Syngas is recycled, and the initial cost of plant is a Capital expenditure, amortised over expected plant life ( c'mon swaz, get your AI into that one), then the most significant cost will be labour. Engineers, Technicians, Labourers. QC personnel. etc. It's no use saying these details will be given at time of prospective customer visits, It's not a trade secret. If we had been given these details at CMD, then I would have guaranteed the sp would now be at least +20% not -20%. Oh dear swaz has still to understand that PHE sp is RNS driven. His comment that PHE is being 'shorted' is laughable. I attempted a 'dummy' short on IG this morning. 'Not available to short, only as a 'buy' or 'sell'. If he could have proven it, he would have. However, It is almost certain I suggest, that Hedge Fund buddies of Trump, with inside information from the 'horses head', have shorted the USA markets. With HUI JV in Ireland now 'on the back burner', and no working large scale plant to supply Avioxx with Syngas, it's difficult to see when the next decent RNS is coming from. I would suggest, another 'Open Day' with invited VIPs from customer prospect lists, News outlets, Environment Organisations, and do a commercial presentation, stating all the benefits of ridding waste plastic from the environment, DMG profitability, and ticks all the boxes for a 'win, win' DMG purchase. Watch the sp then. Will PHE do this.? Two hopes, 'No hope, and Bob Hope.'

Have to debunk some nefarious comments posted about me. Let us begin with oh dear swaz. I have posted a few times his misleading comments about #dedinking my 'facts'. His last diatribe was in relation to my post about the CMD, when I aked attendees, through this board, several questions about what physically happened. rather than their opinions. I got no response. In the absence of no response, I said, IT COULD have been a scam. Most people will know the difference between ''could' and 'is'. Obviously not eachtotheirown. Swaz was only slightly better when he said I used the term 'may have been a scam'. Nither he or his AI knows the difference between 'may' and 'could'.. I could dismantle each and every one of his points, but boring to me, and to you. so the first on I think will suffice to show how pathetic his post was. I asked attendees, with getting a reply, if the furnace 'radiated heat'. Oh dear swaz 'debunks' this with 'the DMG process is gasification and does not use radiated heat'. ( a synopsis of his actual text) It is obvious I was talking about the steel lining of the furnace radiating heat, like our Sun radiates heat. The Sun generates heat with nuclear fusion reactions, which we receive as radiated heat. No thermal insulation is 100% effective ( only in rare circumstances, and since there is obvious heat inside the furnace, some of that heat will be transferred to the lining( it will get warm, or even hot, and on the outside, this heat will be felt as radiated heat. As the 'video fly through' clearly shows, there is a guard rail around the furnace, preventing people from getting too close. Nothing to do with the process that goes on inside of the furnace, you numptie swaz. You will not reply to this, which is your MO on getting fact checked, 'just ignore.' .

Finally, eachtotheirown, who is not one to engage in arguments etc, ( his words), let me remind hime again, I only mentioned his name aftef this comment from my post about CMD, 'could have been a scam'. His reply;

'I wouldn’t like to live in your mind thinking it was all a con 🤣 I bet everyday is a battle! Maybe with all your questions the best thing would have been to attend'.

Nice from someone who doesn't want to engage in arguments. Doesn't understand written English, and then on that basis, tries to ridicule the poster. His defence then is ' your posts do not make sense'. When understanding English is a problem, yes, they will appear complicated to you.