Member Info for testpack3

From you AI post , swaz.

'🔴 “Use of Nickel (Ni) as a catalyst is unlikely due to sulfur (S).”

❗ Speculative Misinformation: You present assumptions as facts.

✅ Fact: Nickel is indeed unsuitable due to its reactivity with sulfur, which forms Nickel Sulfide (NiS), deactivating the catalyst. DMG uses proprietary catalysts resistant to sulfur contamination.

First, your AI uses the American spelling. In the UK , we use Sulphur.

Have you noticed the big contradiction.? I'll give you a clue;

You presented my factual statement about Ni being 'killed' by S as 'speculative misinformation, and using assumptions as facts'. The next paragrapgh then stated my comment was indeed factual. You can't make it up. Oh yes you can, because you did. A classic, and puts your final comment in perspective'

'✅ Conclusion. @Testpack3, your arguments fall apart when exposed to factual scrutiny.

This response has once again dismantled your claims with verified facts and logical reasoning. If you choose to return with more misinformation, rest assured that it will be met with the same level of precision and clarity.'

Really.

Hi Rivaldo.

But no mention of the lost rail contract, and the £2M loss in revenue, or the 205 drop in sp. Why. Not good reading I suppose. Are you sure that investors only want to hear a biased view of companies performance. It certainly looks like you do.

Addendum'''

After I 'pressed' post on my last message, LSE wanted to verify ' was I human'. Your posts are AI generated, as you admitted, so why does LSE allow your posts. Time for complaint I believe.

I will dissect your nonsense systematically, without the use of AI, showing that indeed, you are the 'numero uno' in the propagation of 'misinformation' and 'disinformation'. An easy one for starters. your post stated;

'🔥 The DMG® unit operates at an efficiency of 82-85%, surpassing industry benchmarks and supporting cost-effective hydrogen production.'

The DMG process is 'propriety', hence, then can be no 'industry benchmarks'. Also, DMG is being sold as a producer of Syngas, not H2. Thr buyer decides what if the Syngas requires refining to add value.

You have used 'propriety' many times. Where did you get 82.5% efficiency?. It is 'self sustaining' on energy requirement, following initial external source to get furnace to operating temperatures.

The following is a tad more complex for your AI ( and you), to comprehend. Use of Nickel, (Ni) as a catalyst, as I suggested, ( a catalyst being a substance that increases the Rate of Reaction of any chemical process), was for your AI to 'dig a hole'. Indeed it dug. It is most unlikely that a Ni catalyst is used in DMG for the following reason. Ni, as a catalyst, has an Achilles heel, Sulphur (S), Nearly all plastics contain S. Ni has a propensity to bond with S, forming Nickel Sulfide, (NiS),which 'kills' it, making it ineffective as a catalyst. There are other substance which are not affected by S, but the catalysts PHE uses will be closely guarded.

Crude Oil is broadly categorised as 'sweet', 'sour', 'light' and 'heavy'.. They refer, obviously, because of its pungency, to the S content, light oils contain very little S., heavier, sour oils more. The more valuable is 'light sweet crude', since it is easier to refine for the mfr of fuels. N Sea Brent is a very good example of .sweet'.

The heavier oils ( defined by it's Boiling Point) are more expensive to refine. The 'dregs' of refining crude oils are used to , tars and bitumen. Most plastic is 'synthetically' produced, ie; from Crude oil. There are many processes, but, the vast majority will contain S. That is why Ni is most unlikely to be used in DMG.

AI's musings on 'Sustainability and Growth' are taken from any handbook on basic management philosophies.

Finally, your AI insists on dismissing my 'facts' about DrAnomoly fake PhD as 'opinion'. No, it was the actual words that the narcissist used when asked if he was a Dr of medicine. he went at some length to lie that it was from A NZealand Uni for a management related thesis. Fact, not opinion, as proved by your reluctance, and his, to answer any of the dozen or more times I have you. Your 'most honest and trustworthy' friend. lol. Now, of course, posting under H2hooo, as thoughn he is some H2 guru. lol

An poster exhibiting more eloquence than I have, encapsulated your posts as 'Garbage'. True indeed.

What does your AI know about the temps at the various zones. Has your AI identified these 'zones' in the DMG structure, and what are the 'critical' temp range to optimise Syngas output.? Trifoil operation mfg SAF from waste plastic, may go through a 'gas first', further refined to 'liquid'? The detail on their website are scant, for obvious reasons. How does your AI know if the temps used at Trifoil are not the exact ones needed to optimise output.? Of the 1000's of pyolysis plant operating around the World, how does your AI know if any of them are in breach of PHE Patent. ? I mentioned how does PHE govern Patent infringement some time ago, AI answer was the usual 'Garbage'. I put you right on the driving force of SP on OEM on AIM, that is RNS, and at least your AI has taken the hint, and stopped issuing nonsense charts on PHE. It will wait for the RNS and then detail how it 'foretold' everything. Your MO.

Wht don't you input all of The Fakes previous posts on PHE into AI, and his academic achievements, and see if it comes up with ' misinformation, disinformation, deceit, untrustworthy'. There's a good fella.

BTW. Ask your Ai what catalyst does it think PHE is using in DMG, and does it think there are different catalyst for each of the different temp zones ? What is you Ai opinion on the use of Nickel Catalysts, which are proven to be excellent in increasing H2 yield in thermal processes involving FF derived substances.? Looking forward to its reply.

The II's recent TI's show, on average, 10% reduction in S/H. Prudent 'top slice'.

This is so naive a question. Confirms the lack of basic physics knowledge on this board. DMG has a constant energy input, in the form of 'feedstock', ie waste plastic, so that PM is laughable. Self sustaining operations are not knew.

Oh dear swaz. Your continued diatribe on PHE patents is nonsense. You mention exactly what the patent is for, that is 'the temp control of various zones in the thermal chamber, to optimise the production of syngas', but you do not understand what that means. There are literally, 1000s of Pyrolysis plants Worldwide, many with feedstocks including waste plastic, which do not contravene PHE DMG patents. You, and your AI script, do not know the temps involved, or even what the different zones are. Trifoil in Ireland is using pyrolysis to convert waste plastic to SAF, or so it reports, and do you think PHE personnel have visited their site to ensure the sanctity of its patents?

Finally swaz, no reply on you posting misinformation and disinformation, regularly on this board, regarding your Ai posting 2 opposing ideas, specifically, on validation of DMG and RNS reporting. Did your PC 'blow a fuse'.

One item not mentioned in the 'win' scenarios discussed on this thread, is 'punitive' damages. These are awarded by the Court, in the case of a successful litigation, against the Defendant in order to deter similar malfeasance in the future. These can be substantial, especially when a Govt is the Defendant.

I will stick with my musings a month or so ago, and say 2026 is the year when events will unfold. The parties have months in which to notify The Court of the main characters prosecuting and defending the case.

Your earlier post;

' They are garbage and should be treated as such. It's why I will never stop destroying their lies with facts and logic.'

You mentioned a few posters in this, yet another diatribe of nonsense. I destroyed your AI comments yesterday, with FACTS, about 2 of it's statements contradicting each other. And of course , it's continued refusal to talk about the lies from you and H2Hoo, concerning his former 'fake' name on this board. Lies and deceit. Always remember swaz. as in programing computers, crap in, crap out. Get the crap out of here and disappear for say, a year.

Oh dear swaz

. Another waste of time to even just glance at your nonsense diatribe. To start, Letus begin with the last para of my post re SAF, which you conveniently 'left our' in your musings, sorry, AI musings.

'ps. You deleted my post from yesterday, in which I copied your ' cannot quote facts' blah, blah, blah. I asked you more than a dozen times to explain the fake 'handle' of your 'most trusted and honest friend', who. like you, uses disinformation and misinformation. It's you swaz, who can't handle the truth. FACT.'

You still can't answer that question, FACT. Good of you to own up to 'having posts deleted'. Such a 'big man'. I know swaz, the truth hurts you. My conversation with the CEO pre-dates all you nonsense on SAF. FACT. SAF from waste plastic, was first mentioned on this board, probably 6 months or more, ago, when ot was announced, in Ireland, that an Irish company, Trifoil, was mfgSAF from waste plastic, using Pyrolysis. Obviously no PHE Patent infringement.

Then I fell to the floor laughing at this nonsense in your diatribe;

'🔹 Regulatory Compliance Exists for a Reason. PHE follows market disclosure rules—an RNS is only issued when results are fully verified and validated. No responsible company throws out half-baked RNS updates just to satisfy impatient trolls who are obsessed with short-term share price moves.'

On the 6thFeb, you posted;

''.PHE’s DMG® technology has already demonstrated successful operational performance, with further validation expected from Bridgend’s imminent commissioning.'

These 2 comments are at odds with each other. Both cannot be true. So, ask your AI which was is true. RNS only issued when results fully verified and validated, or full operational performance has been achieved. This would have been RNS's, n'est pas. I would stand well clear of your AI PC when asking the question, I think it will 'blow many circuits trying to evaluate your inputs. Take a year off in Fantasy Island with the 3 stooges. However, I gather from reading a Dumber post, that Dumb encapsulated your 3 page diatribe on SAF into 1 sentence. Suggestion. Put your AI PC in the bin, and employ Dumb.

ps . Copy and Paste, that is what your Fake friend excelled in. On the few occasions I have c n p an article, I give the reference of the author. I have been educated to post degree level, and do not need AI to converse on subjects.

Oh dear swaz. You are a lot behind on this one. My email to paul from 21 Nov. last year.

'21 Nov 2024, 11:00

to Enquire

Attn Paul Emmett

Dear CEO. I trust that PHE has already made representation to UK Govt

representative at the above meeting. Aims, I believe, are to make

plastic product producers 'accountable', and, hopefully, ways to

tackle plastic pollution, where, evidence has shown, microplastics in

the food chain, will cause major health problems.

On a separate issue, will the 'test' in S Wales also include

production of AF ( aviation fuel), from waste plastic, which, IMO,

would not qualify as SAF ( sustainable), or from Bio-Mass, which would

be SAF. ? AF from waste plastic, is naturally, a much 'greener'

solution that AF from FF.

Wishing great success for the Company and its' employees.

Regards'

And, his reply;

'Thanks for the e-mail.

Yes, we are conversing with the government, we have been involved in all of the applicable consultations, and continue to lobby our cause.

As for SAF, we won't be testing SAF or AF at Bridgend for the foreseeable future. As you are aware the conversion of syngas to SAF requires a number of ancillary processes, we will be more likely to work with a SAF producer and supply them the required syngas for their process. I am in discussion with a number of technology companies who are interested in placing test units at Bridgend once the process is up and running.

There are a number of things we can look at in the coming year, but at the moment my focus is on meeting the schedule for the FTU build.

Many thanks

Paul.

Look like I know more about this than your AI. lol. Enjoy.

ps. You deleted my post from yesterday, in which I copied your ' cannot quote facts' blah, blah, blah. I asked you more than a dozen times to explain the fake 'handle' of your 'most trusted and honest friend', who. like you, uses disinformation and misinformation. It's you swaz, who can't handle the truth. FACT.

AtD

'Simply put I can buy ALL or BP shares (just examples of SETS traded shares one low volume with more MM intervention and one high volume) without asking for a quote by buying directly at market price and it will show as an A trade.....FACT (you wouldn't quote for peanuts on BP anyway you buy at market unless you can put large orders in that need filled'

Total BS.

I have bought BP, on SETS, showed as '0'

I am sure there will be a detailed RNS, at least with preliminary results of 'the test'. The Company certainly would not want a group of investors at Bridgend, including II's, with nothing positive to tell them. I suspect the RNS with 'result' to be issued some time before 4 March, and give time for investors to digest information. Probably before 21st this month. I am going to add a few more today.

Yep, 99, I know what options are, the debate was about A and O trades, and AtD stated that the A trade is for trades which are outside the 'normal' volume ( ie. large ) trades. Which is incorrect. You piped up and said that it was Hedge Fund trades, and that buying on SETS on your pc was an A trade. Not so. Every trade that PI's make, whether they are large, small, 3 day payment, options, are O trades. I have already described the mechanism for A trades. So, why do you think you pay a commission when you buy with your pc.?

Your reply to my post just proves that you are the leader in .misinformation and disinformation.

These are your words, not mine;

.'.PHE’s DMG® technology has already demonstrated successful operational performance, with further validation expected from Bridgend’s imminent commissioning.'

Note the use of the verb 'has', present tense, meaning PHE already HAS 'successful operational performance' data. My question to you was this;

'When and where was this successful operation performed. Your Reply ( I'm trying not to laugh) was this.

'

🚩 Misinformation. The original Oz unit was an early prototype, not a commercial model. Development has progressed significantly since then. Bridgend’s upcoming hot commissioning is precisely what will validate full operational performance at a commercial level. Independent validation and engineering reports confirm the viability of the DMG® process—ignoring this doesn’t make it untrue.'.lol

So there it is, Bridgends upcoming trials WILL validate full OP'. WILL, future tense swaz. see the difference. Now that you are on the ropes, and bruised, take this on,

Who has independently validated, and who wrote engineering reports confirming the viability of DMG. ?

You will need more than AI for this answer,

BTW. You are in great company with your ;friends' on this board. Fake Bob. Dumb, Dumber and Castle. You should have a get together at Bridgend. There is a collective noun for such a meeting. 'A Thickett' Enjoy.

Fially swaz, you are pretty good at name calling, and your 'most honest and trusted friend '(lo), calls me 'Testacles'. or 'Testicular', would have been more accurate if he had included 3.

Aimtodeath' incorrect.

When you buy a share on aplatform, electronically, it is designated an ordinary trade, 'O'. It goes through a brokers house. You pay commision. Yes. Who do think has that commission? Algo trades , are used by hedge funds, amongst others, and it ia an automated trade, with no human input ( except in the design of the Algo). These trades are executed milliseconds after a buy/sell is registered and designed not to reflect the change in price which may result from the buy/sell. I think I'm right in saying that LSE does not trade 'options'.

So, what a scared cat you are, don't want to upset H2h00.lol. You told me to' grow up' because 'it's just a user name', I told you it wasn't, and the fake confirmed that on this board. Of, course, when he changed his monika, all DrAnomoly past posts were removed. How convenient for him. So now you are calling me a 'liar' by doubling down on it's only a 'user name'. I gave you the chance to prove me wrong, and you right, but you can't even do that. You are probably 'a fake' as well. Fakes stick together.

Oh dear swaz

I normally just skip your AI nonsense posts. I noticed, from the corner of my eye, DMG, so I thought I would read that nonsense. Wasn't disappointed. Your AI has a serious flaw, you and the Fake put the information in.

'.PHE’s DMG® technology has already demonstrated successful operational performance, with further validation expected from Bridgend’s imminent commissioning. Wastefront’s progress in tyre-to-fuel proves that alternative waste-to-energy solutions are becoming commercially viable—PHE is following a similar path with its multi-feedstock, multi-output model.'

When and where has DMG 'demonstrated successful operational performance.' An 'Oz' unit was built a decade ago, shipped to UK, located at Chester Uni, but no results of tests were ever published.

A 'multi-output model. Wrong again. HE model is for one output, Syngas. It leaves the ustomer to decide on what to do with that Syngas. Power generation, SAF, etc. However, at present, and has been RNS, the model for DMG is Syngas production. In the recent RNS stating collaboration with Avioxx for production of SAF, the agreement is that PHE will supply Syngas.

You don't really understand PHE do you?, and need AI to help you, but the 'programmer' is flawed.

Below is copied from Google search on Algo trading.

'Algorithmic trading (algo trading) is a method of trading that uses algorithms to automatically execute orders based on pre-defined criteria. The London Stock Exchange (LSE) has been a leader in algorithmic trading, and has developed innovations to support it. '

How does LSE know if O or A trade. On SETS, when you press a button to buy/sell, the trade goes through a broker. This is designated as 'O' trade . Automatic, or Algo trades 'A' do not use a broker, the Algo on the computer makes the trade, no humans involved.

How does algorithmic trading work?

Algorithms analyze large amounts of market data in real time

Algorithms execute trades when pre-defined criteria are met

Algorithms can break large orders into smaller orders to reduce the impact of large trades

Algorithms can remove human emotion and bias from trading decisions

Benefits of algorithmic trading Can handle large orders without disrupting market prices, Can improve market liquidity, Can reduce slippage, and Can be more cost-efficient than human trading.

You have not asked H2hoo about his fake monika. You said it 'just a user name'. So, prove it to yourself then. Send him a post. I can assure you he has not filtered you. look forward to your post and his non-reply.