Member Info for Supercharger

This should help us tomorrow -good timing for the rise, good luck.

Not sure what is fueling the sudden jump unless it is because the US Navy have shot down an Iranian Drone it was felt was attacking a US war ship?

I saw a Bloomberg article on Elon Musk and they said he actually had no intention to keep making cars, his intention is once the other big car manufacturers come in to concentrate only on making batteries for his and the other car manufacturers. So someone who knew him well said his long term goal was to become a battery manufacturer to all, however the Company you have found does look a good punt as they have fallen from say 49p to less than half. Well spotted.

All set up for tomorrow chaps. Best of luck.

They are up about 20% in a few weeks and still rising. They are now the Uk's largest brewer!! Export abroad and so their beer will be cheaper for our International foreign drinkers.
Obviously doing very well in the hot weather. Could be a good place to put your Aca profits!!!

All doing. very, very well to be honest -happy Days.
Aca should be as you say moving up in value but MB is not someone who takes a beating lightly -so be prepared for him trying to be clever- it is in his nature. The only thing stopping him is JT- perhaps he can take him into the Headmaster's study for a lecture on his three month appraisal as I am NOT sure he has made all of his objectives and his bonus must be in question!! Maybe he would be safer travelling back to Jersey fishing, rather than hunting down Rhino Horn, HA,HA..

Gold now in Usd 1423 AND RISING -House of Lords voting in no deal Brexit and some reckon that if approved Sterling will fall to be on a par with the dollar. This will make us very cheap for Barrick -keep watching events!!i

My purpose of the last couple of days is to let those of limited funds have time to get out whilst they have the opportunity, if they wish to? Now i see the long term boarder's here which is good to take it to Barrick, I have seen one or two new posts here in the last couple of days who could be associated with Barrick? We have to be aware they will be contributing in every way they can to put us off the scent. One mailer in particular I was concerned about. I think for the next three days we now want to think what we can do to help us, and be careful of showing any weakness. I am sure what with some writing in to Barrick they may be aware of our board. As Shaw taylor used to say "keep'em'peeled" -what is meant to be is meant to be. The risks are high but I see a return of many times the multiple if we do go to Int Arb, but the ball is now very firmly from all sides in Barick's Court which is what they have wanted.

Pressure from the GOT but stay being sought for Barrick to conclude talks, if not agreed then Arbitration will start. I see this as a protective measure regarding the notices regarding the tailings at N.Mala. The Bulldozer clearly wants a solution before the imminent Countries elections.
http://tools.morningstar.co.uk/uk/stockreport/default.aspx?tab=3&vw=story&SecurityToken=0P0000NGQO%5D3%5D0%5DE0WWE%24%24ALL&Id=0P0000NGQO&ClientFund=0&CurrencyId=BAS&story=PRNRNS_201907170200PR_NEWS_UKDISCLO_0013

A change following elections is very good news for Acacia :-
https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/news/1840340-5197754-8tqkh7/index.html

Yes all aware of what you have said and more. We also hear of a push me pull me clause so that Acacia at any low ball offer price can actually buy Barrick out instead, or alternatively as we also all know Acacia have been talking directly to three Chinese Companies about them investing in here too. I can only see the reason for Barricks delayed formal offer as being afraid to do so and to not get into an auction. At this stage Barrick have failed like they have with the discussions whereby they have not even been able to talk to Acacia for a final formal agreement based on what the G.O.T have said. This is all old ground. Whereas Barrick see an "influence problem" and they would like everyone to read this as being with their 2/3rds control of Acacia in fact the failure to broker a deal acceptable to all parties has resulted in a problem now with the GOT who must be very frustrated with them. The GOT know Barrick have the ability and money available to make Acacia a fair and reasonable offer to the minority shareholders but if they do not I can see the lawyers and us as Acacia shareholders will become richer than the low ball offer provides. Barrick then risk the loss of all credibility with the G.O.T and lets face it have taken far too long already trying to find a solution which has been self imposed according to Acacia. The hard ball low ball approach needs to be reconsidered based on increased production, increased gold reserves and a gold price in sterling well in excess of a 20% rise for the year. Acacia shareholders are aware that the GOT have previously signed contracts which gives them certain protection at law, if the documents are still valid then whatever the GOT or Barrick say will not affect the legal rights Acacia have and they will have to continue to take to arbitration. Certainly the like of ODEY can see this as well as now being a very good buying opportunity. At the moment it is Barrick who have been the big let down, not Acacia. Someone once said you have to earn influence well lets see Barrick do it.

Barna, I can see what he has said and he is using the press to his advantage, however what he says and what the actual situation is are two different things. I.e Even the G.O.T. spokesman has said for Acacia is all depends on Barrick. MB has also said after his talks with the G.O.T. that strangely they now do not want to talk with Acacia? This is after he and they have been talking. He survives on influence and has certainly found he has this in spades with the G.O.T. but Acacia it seems he feels have none and that is why the minority owners should take less. Well he already has the greater is influence but does not have legal control which is perhaps what should have been said.

BB I have not changed my opinion but many here or not in the same financial position as we are and I am concerned for them as this is what MB wants high risk. If not we would have heard from him by now.
Barna again what you have quoted from MB is not correct he is the one with the greatest influence. Infact many here wonder why he has so much and that is because unfortunately the Aca board allowed Barrick as the major shareholder to negotiate and take control which is what they have done. So his comments are not correct if they have come from him. In fact the opposite is true. I am not sure if the terms of the Barrick engagement have ever been recorded but if they have then their could well be another Insurance claim here?

BB-Absolutely no discussion on the probability of a deal. However someone is buying shorts. It is not me, I am here for the long term. This is now high risk, but can also offer some very high rewards for someone. Who that person is and on what side of the situation and when I do not know. Most here have been aware the price has been held down so what I have said is in the public domain in anycase. I can afford to lose all of my money here, but there are some who maybe are not in the same position as me. This could swing either way. Long term I see Acacia should get more out of this than they currently have, but who knows for sure. Long term could be in a few years, not a few days. Everyone has their own call here.

Parf,-I hope the example I gave for RBC SA Capital markets will open your eyes to the fact these big trading houses will also trade for their own clients, but presumably still have to make a disclosure.

I now communicate with Acacia and RBC their advisers and they told me where as they might have a short holding but this is not for them this is if they have an order for a Client. I was concerned about a conflict but they said no this was a disclosure during the course of their ordinary business. The short is for am American client and is put through their SA branch?? I wonder who that could be for??? Two days before the GOT announcement?? This for some is a dangerous game I am sure?? I think those directly involved need to be careful as the London market is very small, I found that at Lloyds.

In all likelihood no deal is going to be reached between Barrick and Acacia -don't kid yourselves? The GOT will then be difficult to Acacia until they realize that in actual fact Barrick is the one calling all the shots. I expect things to get worse before they get better and so if anyone is in any doubt I suggest they sell their shares now and let Odey continue to build for those that wish to hold. The International Arbitration could take a couple of years to settle and by which time as RP has always said there will be Govt elections. If most have lost their jobs at Acacia they are not going to vote for a bulldozer and if there is any foul play in the elections the International community will be told not to invest in Tanzania. If in doubt stay out, I do not need the thousands I have invested here so if you need your money you may wish to take less risk. Your call.

Before you correct me (I must put my glasses on and stop my big fat fingers on the keyboard) Yes I do mean the Gold price being up 20% for the year, 485 for five, and 586% for the past 20!!
If we key in for Acacia's future projected earnings we should be considering a far higher price than today's which is being held back only by political events.

We are now usd1416.59 an oz, I wonder what the composites held are now worth as Gold in Sterling has risen by 20% in a year!!! The God price is up 48% or more from when Barrick cast us off.

& as Barrick are Canadian afterall we should take JT's lead, "we will only sign the deal if it is good for Acacia"
otherwise we will dispute the contracts and side agreements (as if they are not worth anything why have we signed them in the first place). The papers and licences we have are worth something and all the parties such as the GOT and Barrick knew at the time what they were signing and where happy to do so, all are legally enforceable in an International Arbitration court. I actually agree with you Hasiba that on the showing from Barrick I do not actually want their shares either, I also do not agree with you Redbeast (you are not MB in disguise are you), as I have already taken a severe drop in price here and Barrick are only interested in their own feathered nest going forward, and as Barrick shares have risen they are likely to fall, I never buy shares if I can help it after a rise, and as we have done no wrong as shareholders we also have other options and those are even more extensive that what both Barrick and Acacia have referred to as a shareholder. (Acacia have avoided action against them by staying loyal to us the minority shareholders) but some of whom on this board (not me) -have previously severely criticized Acacia BOD in the past for a lack of information when it now appears it was Barrick not forwarding what has been discussed for agreement. I hope we can avoid any shareholder action if they can both do the right thing as the long term the value of Acacia's interests has gone up and Barrick's share price is likely to fall.

Acacia should not be afraid either BB, the insurers will no doubt be using the same team of lawyers, as I said before they have access to the best lawyers in the World. As this result published in the newspaper of yesterday I would feel the GOT may have to reconsider if they want to go to arbitration. The dispute looked very similar and a good spot Dimi.
This has helped us tremendously as Barrick will also come in some more money too, and the odds on success look good what with case law having been established.