Member Info for Stupmy

So have you noticed this happening with posts from other people fog?

I'm not big on conspiracy theories, but this would not seem to be an open and honest forum.

I'll sneak one in here

I've previously said I think 235 or lower and quite likely 220 or lower are likely on the SP here. I've been right so far (when others were buying this up at 290 and above), maybe my lucky streak will continue bot. Really, you only have to care enough to put the time aside to check. But, people don't do they. People prefer to run with dodgy info that makes them feel comfortable about being wrong (and losing money!).

Let's see how long that post stays up!!

I'm doing screen caps from time to time now, as I like objectivity and information that can be checked and solid proof. So whatever the censorship, I can actually post linkes to screen caps to prove that I'm not being rude or breaking any rules, just expressing opinions.

Apparently, my opinions are dangerous enough to get my posts removed on a regular basis. Or is a moderator of the site, also a contributer (SH?) and is this person willy nilly removing posts that he/she doesn't agree with or like? Something not very honest happening here folk.

You just have to follow back the historical record that is the bb here. It will be full of holes for HBR, I'm not aware that I'm censored elsewhere.

But, if my posts are removed despite me not breaking any rules. You have to ask yourself, how many other posts are censored and whether what we're reading is moderated in a way that means we don't get to see what others are thinking? That's a dangerous way to go.

Before I'm moderated AGAIN.

I have no idea why my posts are being removed. If anyone can tell me which rules I'm breaking, I'd be pleased to hear. Otherwise it would appear to me that the board is censored. That is not in anyone's interests unless, it's done for clear and openly honest reasons (this is not).

Anyway, there's not much point me posting if it's removed. If you were to look back at my posts elsewhere (I'm only censored on the HBR board), you'll see that I am very accurately predicting price movements in advance. If that's not helpful to people then I don't know what would be.

This is very annoying and not useful to anyone at all.

Someone has an answer as someone is specifically removing my posts.

Stevo commented on this a long while back. He questioned, with lots of info, whether the deal was quite as good as it was being made out to be. It would take some looking out now, but I guess it's still there if you look back to around the time it was announced.

That's a worry Chid. The whole of that post suggests you have no idea at all about the markets. Please convince me I'm wrong.

"Maybe a shorter got cold feet and dumped the lot last thing, yet to show.

On google shows 329.4!"

But, between us Aim, have we just solved the government's financial black hole for them? Cool, that, right there deserves a glass of bubbly to kick off the increase in government tax returns.

Wouldn't hurt to cut/drop the EPL to increase tax returns? They have been saying they need more tax revenue. A bold move like that might have seemed counter-intuitive a couple of years ago, but in a couple of years time it might be viewed as a stroke of genius for Rachel from accounts

Looks like I just had my post question OHGs idea that 235 was an all time low, has been removed. What is going on with this board? How could that have broken any rules? Very weird, HBR board is to my posts what the Bermuda triangle is to shipping!!

"235p ALL TIME LOW "

OHG, when you say all time low, is that 'all time' since the last series of lows that were a fair bit lower than todays price?

I think it comes from that support/turned resistance. There are 2 touches. I have it as a range from around 222 to 227/228. Personally (maybe this is me incorporating my own fundamental views) I don't think those levels will be strong resistance (let's see how that view ages!). I have 352 area as interesting.

Sheltie, how do you get to 327? Are you taking that from a low on Feb 26 2024?

I often do the same Oct. Many articles are based on syndicated news so you can access it from different sources

Finishing up the video Dart. Can't help noticing it's only been viewed 23 times. Madness, all this great stuff out there and no-one watching it. Richard Stuckey seems to be a bright guy that knows his stuff.

Watching the vid now Dartron. Interesting to see someone on the inside discussing it. I've always thought also that YOU is not an obvious short at these levels. Still think there's a good chance we'll see 320 area on this. But the risks of shorting a small, illiquid company at what seems to be a low valuation just has to hold a lot of risk

Wow, more of a reaction than I'd even hoped for. Long may it continue.

Looks good, that's a relief as the SP has languished for a while now. Fingers crossed the market will respond well to this update

I've read that this morning. I'm hoping the market responds well to it, looks good to me.

Silverspoons, how much would that affect us at the moment?

"...oh and another awful closing auction to finish with"

NAV, that is a poor close and it makes the 235 area a lot more likely, quite possibly lower.