Member Info for Stupmy

I've added. But I'm nowhere near at the level I'd like to be here.

I've had a bit of time to look back and try to get ready for more precise entries around the level I previously suggested at 220. I'm glad I did, as that view looks to be invalid now. So my level of confidence about seeing 220 or lower is now low. I think that has become. The reason I looked back is the activity around the SP today. I started to wonder whether it was nearing a bottom. For my view now is that 232-233 has a good rationale, but 220 or below does not.

That is not supposed to be advice to anyone else, but having said on a few occasions I thought 220 was likely, I thought it only honest to say that that may very well have been based on flawed thinking.

Oddly enough I did and I couldn't, thanks for the date.

Does anyone have a date for this? I see it was Jan 31st last year?

For clarity. I dropped out and took my profit for the moment. Will watch with interest now.

Good luck all.

My first limit order went through. I set it slightly above the 235 (or lower) that I have viewed as very likely for a long time. So, bot that's my first entry. Its at 236 (25000 shares; so you can check the veracity of my comments). I will continue to 'trade my views; I always do as I find that talk is cheap and most of what is posted on bbs is of no value at all. Just want to be clear, that my posts are not a case of opening the window and talking to the night.

Right, it's rare that I do this, but I've sent the following to admin. I'd like to know why this board is censored.

If I get a response, I'll also post that.

On the above public board, my posts are regularly removed. To the best of my knowledge I'm breaking no rules, I'm not being rude to others and I've been told that other posts are also removed.That suggests some form of insidious censorship whereby those reading are only allowed to see certain views. It doesn't take a genius to understand that censorship of this kind removes freedom of speech and also freedom of choice in what to read and what not to read.I'd be interested in knowing why this is happening.

Thanks fog, I'm glad it's not just me. I was feeling a bit 'mad' over this until I started screen capping it. It seems so unlikely that the posts of a PI that don't break any rules would be censored on a bb that I started to doubt myself. I also don't like wasting my time scrolling back to check.

SWKM, not sure what I wrote regarding 'dump', I'm getting too old to remember what I ate for breakfast it would seem. I didn't change my position yesterday, that's just for clarity. We had a consolidation phase which I interpreted as bullish. That traded roughly 295 to 312 (don't jump down my throat anyone as I did say roughly). We broke up to 332/333ish and have pulled back. At the moment that seems like a normal part of the uptrend with the price now back testing the consolidation trading range. No-one can see into the future. Technically I do see a risk fo 246 or lower but I don't currently view it as particularly likely. Best guess is that we will see 352 or higher. Like I say, no-one can see into the future and for most price movements my guesses hold only a moderate level of confidence. Some of the larger movements are very often, very predictable

So have you noticed this happening with posts from other people fog?

I'm not big on conspiracy theories, but this would not seem to be an open and honest forum.

I'll sneak one in here

I've previously said I think 235 or lower and quite likely 220 or lower are likely on the SP here. I've been right so far (when others were buying this up at 290 and above), maybe my lucky streak will continue bot. Really, you only have to care enough to put the time aside to check. But, people don't do they. People prefer to run with dodgy info that makes them feel comfortable about being wrong (and losing money!).

Let's see how long that post stays up!!

I'm doing screen caps from time to time now, as I like objectivity and information that can be checked and solid proof. So whatever the censorship, I can actually post linkes to screen caps to prove that I'm not being rude or breaking any rules, just expressing opinions.

Apparently, my opinions are dangerous enough to get my posts removed on a regular basis. Or is a moderator of the site, also a contributer (SH?) and is this person willy nilly removing posts that he/she doesn't agree with or like? Something not very honest happening here folk.

You just have to follow back the historical record that is the bb here. It will be full of holes for HBR, I'm not aware that I'm censored elsewhere.

But, if my posts are removed despite me not breaking any rules. You have to ask yourself, how many other posts are censored and whether what we're reading is moderated in a way that means we don't get to see what others are thinking? That's a dangerous way to go.

Before I'm moderated AGAIN.

I have no idea why my posts are being removed. If anyone can tell me which rules I'm breaking, I'd be pleased to hear. Otherwise it would appear to me that the board is censored. That is not in anyone's interests unless, it's done for clear and openly honest reasons (this is not).

Anyway, there's not much point me posting if it's removed. If you were to look back at my posts elsewhere (I'm only censored on the HBR board), you'll see that I am very accurately predicting price movements in advance. If that's not helpful to people then I don't know what would be.

This is very annoying and not useful to anyone at all.

Someone has an answer as someone is specifically removing my posts.

Stevo commented on this a long while back. He questioned, with lots of info, whether the deal was quite as good as it was being made out to be. It would take some looking out now, but I guess it's still there if you look back to around the time it was announced.

That's a worry Chid. The whole of that post suggests you have no idea at all about the markets. Please convince me I'm wrong.

"Maybe a shorter got cold feet and dumped the lot last thing, yet to show.

On google shows 329.4!"

But, between us Aim, have we just solved the government's financial black hole for them? Cool, that, right there deserves a glass of bubbly to kick off the increase in government tax returns.

Wouldn't hurt to cut/drop the EPL to increase tax returns? They have been saying they need more tax revenue. A bold move like that might have seemed counter-intuitive a couple of years ago, but in a couple of years time it might be viewed as a stroke of genius for Rachel from accounts

Looks like I just had my post question OHGs idea that 235 was an all time low, has been removed. What is going on with this board? How could that have broken any rules? Very weird, HBR board is to my posts what the Bermuda triangle is to shipping!!

"235p ALL TIME LOW "

OHG, when you say all time low, is that 'all time' since the last series of lows that were a fair bit lower than todays price?

I think it comes from that support/turned resistance. There are 2 touches. I have it as a range from around 222 to 227/228. Personally (maybe this is me incorporating my own fundamental views) I don't think those levels will be strong resistance (let's see how that view ages!). I have 352 area as interesting.