Member Info for stokey12

in relation to my 19.07 post I was refering tothe Tresoil agreement

Audible - I do not dispute what you say but my point is that the agreement has been in place for about a year with no news.

Sharesport - If W2T are saying we have all these agreements I would expect that they should generate some kind of return or why enter into them. At present Japan aside I amat a loss to see what benefit Powerhouse is getting from the tie up with W2T that they could not get from going on trade missions with HMG.

Sharesport re your Sunday 19.08 poston going onto the W2T website I note that the newest news item is from 2017. So what has happened with the Thailand agreement since then it does not appear as if Powerhouse has benefitted from it. We seem to be in a similar position as wit the Tresoil agreement in that agreements are signed that do not generate any revenues despite all the hype at the timethey are signed.

slicksandwets - Thanks for this I note that methane is a byproduct of the DMG process so there might be some synergies in somekind of tie up.

Kenny100 -Was there a point to posting this link? The only thing of minor interest was the £10k trade

Bewarethebrokers - I would rather say there mau be news next week. Just in case there is not.

Audible - Must be you I manage to get a few of my emails to the company. You are right that Keith used to reply to them. As I do no like giving out direct email addresses wihtout permission I should not gie the email address I use.

When the waste strategy came out last year there was a suggestion that HMG might introduce an incinerator tax. When Powerhouse proves that the DMG system works if such a tax was introduced what do you think this would do for Powerhouse as it has the only realistic alternative to incineration of unrecycable waste.

Jabberba - In relation to your 18.13 post I agree with you but where it can affect the market in listed shares then a coordinated announcement with the listed company if appropriate would arguably be best to aviod any suprious market abuse allegation. Also in this case it may be that the information was not for general release but only to the people it was sent to.

Jabberba - I must say I find the giving of information like this highly irregular and borderline illegal. It could be argued that the fact that waste2tricity is seeking funding for the plant is market sensitive news. As waste2tricity is not currently a listed company it would not count in relation to them. However if done in relation to PHE it could be damaging.

Jabberba - Where did you see this? Just looked on the waste2tricity website and could not see any new announcement. There is something under deployment opportunities about a plant but I am not sure that relates to PHE as waste2tricity was involved in the failed Bilsthorpe plant.

Ontarget - I believe the initial period has expired but I believe that under the terms of the agreement it may have rolled over if it was not terminated by notice.

sharesport - I do not see any direct connection between Dave Ryan stepping down fromthe W2T Board and his being made Acting CEO of Powerhouse. It is possible for him to do both. There are only two reasons I can think of why he would step down from the W2T Board. Firstly, so he can devote all his time to Powerhouse. Secondly, he is thinking of terminating the agreement with W2T in those circumtances it may not be appropriate to be on the board of both. Time may tell which it is.

I have just emailed Katy and she is forwarding on my information that people are getting restless waiting for an update and will see if one can be given so hopefully an update might be coming soon.

After the surprising news at least to me that ended last week what does everybody hope will happen this week?

Piltick - Not for the number in Kenny100's 13.43 post

It would take a fair number of G3 units to deal with that number of tyres. It would probably need a 50 ton per day unit even then it will take a few of them.

Jeevescat - I am expecting something in time for the UK investors Show in March to persuade new investors to invest

TonyBelvore - I would disagree with you as Keith freely admitted in his comments the company needs somebody with commercial knowledge. I note that the interim CEO has both technical and commercial knowledge. So on balance I would view this as leaning more to the positive.