In defence of Gammy17 Jan 2020 09:36
I'll set my stall out first. I own a decent chunk of share, I think the company will succeed and plan to hold shares until that date.
So, my take on this board and the Zengah v Gammy feud is this.
Zengah posts a lot! I mean a lot! there are days when he posts minutes after his previous post in the same thread. Personally, I find this annoying as I see lots of comments on the board and think, "oh, something has happened" then see about 10 of them span a 5 minute window and are all from Zengah.
In addition, I see a lot of Zengah's posts are either copy paste from old RNS' or stating the same thing yet again about partner entry and it just being around the corner. Again, more noise on the board that, for me, as someone who's been in the share for a long while adds noise to the board.
I personally agree that a good partner entry will send the price up and that it MAY happen soon. Zengah posts his statements in a tone that implies certainty in the action and that it WILL happen soon.
Zengah may indeed by proven right eventually, but if you say it's going to be sunny tomorrow, every day, then it's bound to happen eventually.
I feel this is what causes Gammy to post an alternate view in response to Zengah. As this has been going on a long while, Gammy is posting comments that are extremely negative as a balance to the constant positive stream from Zengah.
This is causing a friction.
I feel the vast majority of people on here would love to see the share succeed and smash through £10 and so are inclined to like Zengahs posts as they support their desire. Conversely, they dislike what Gammy says as it goes against the grain.
How could this be made better?
I would personally like to see less posts from Zengah of the "Partner entry will make this rocket" variety. It's just noise that everyone here knows, so why even feel the need to repeat it? This may result in less frustration from those who find this type of thing noise and less negative comments being made to offset it.