We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Have you instructed your broker yet on how to vote?
Captain hindsight to the rescue!
☹️
Are they back? Still claiming the company is going bust?
Surely, after being very wrong about the outcome of the Q case, they would keep quiet for a bit?
Surely one would wait until the WUP is resolved either way, before returning to gloat / eat humble pie?
As the details are not public, none of us know if Q&M were after this all along.
It could well have been EUA suggesting this course of action and Q&M rejecting it.
None can be sure either way so cannot speak with any certainty on the matter
Just filter them. They have a track record of being an agitant.
They claimed options had expired despite an RNS stating they had been extended (some now being taken up, some actually expiring).
They have been saying a placing is coming for the last 18 months too (a big block of that time during a period when the BoD had no authority to place so it was impossible).
They have it in for the company for some reason so not worth your time.
Timeframe for a sale? Well, the most recent communication from the BoD on that was something along the lines of "hopefully by the end of the year" at the AGM, so I'd assume that's where most people invested are aligned.
Will it be sold by end of they year? Unlikely IMO.
Could a deal be agreed or an offer made by then? Still a chance of that IMO
Could it run on into next year? Quite possible and the likely outcome IMO.
Have you raised any questions with the company regarding the DFS for MT?
I asked a while back and was referred to the RNS saying t would be released when signed off.
Given options have been exercised now, maybe it's worth asking the question again as to when it will be released / why hasn't it been released?
I disagree. Plenty of upside. Huge catalyst would be any sort of resolution to the war.
Still, lots more risk with this share since the war began and sanctions will be something that has to be worked through or around.
I feel the case Del is a "wait and see" item (like many things with the company).
Until something gets released in the form of court docs or RNS then any discussion will be hard to have (even harder if Toffers decides to chime in) as it'll all be based on assumptions and personal views.
The devil will be in the detail, of which none of us on the board will be privy to, so it's somewhat moot to discuss until it is resolved IMO.
When there is a resolution, it will then be interesting to discus what that resolution will mean for the company etc
Sadly, the administration of these boards leaves a lot to be desired these days.
I'm amazed the latest reincarnation of Toffers has lasted so long. Previous monikers were dealt with reasonably swiftly I recall.
Still, I guess it's not in the interests of the LSE board to remove them as more posts mean more traffic mean more ad revenue. Why facilitate useful discussion when you can just allow bickering to get the ad views on the rise.