Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
I wouldn't listen to Tygra if I were you. Last post I read was just lots of opinion presented as fact. Generally with very negatively charged emotional language thrown in. I'd imagine they are still posting the same.
They know as little as we all do about the company.
Stick to what is in the RNS's imo.
Best get back on the phone to the last hnw investor and offer them some more shares ar £5 a piece with some options at £11 to pay these vultures off and get back on with the show
No real surprise with the options extension. Seems like it's a trivial process to extend them so no point reading anything into future expiry dates.
Has CTC been expunged? Hopefully that'll allow for some more actual.discussion going forward
Is Tygra back with another moanalogue?
Is it full of emotive statements like "bod fckd up" which are impossible to judge until the process concludes. Best filter and ignore until there is a resolution one way or the other
Sbrace, and what about the garbage posted by the likes of Wolf, or TC, or many others?
Macs stuff is nearly always speculation based on an RNS or article he links. Good for discussion regardless of which side of the fence you sit.
If they are such a charleton, why are they still here discussing the company? If they had scammed others (which no one can seem to actually explain how that would work) they would have vanished long ago with a big bag of cash no?
All was looking good, then the war came is my take on it. War will end at some point, hopefully things will look good then, if not before
Do take Tygras "opinions" in their posts with a pinch of salt. They were heavily negative last time I read one and usually don't have any substance behind them. I'm assuming that'll still be the same.
Talk was always around starting EUAv2, so it's likely the 20% they didn't intend to pay out would relate in some way to do that.
At least 80% (so could well be higher) but some conditions where it could be lower (so could well be lower).
Makes sense to use the target of 80% for any calculations unless there is information suggesting the reduction clause is likely to happen.