Member Info for SteJSteJ

You keep saying "with good reason". Care to share the good reasons?

"Only problem is that we are no nearer to a sale than this time three years ago." - You have no way of knowing this.

"What should have been done and dusted before Christmas 2020 is no nearer to a completion than then." - You have no way of knowing this

"When the money runs out then the usual dilution will occur." - usual dilution? This isn't UKOG. There hasn't been a placing for over a year (or there abouts).

Who were you previously Richard98? You still fail to answer this query

You keep saying that, yet you continue to post....

Strange behaviour again.

I challenged you to provide facts, yet you provided many opinions.

You claim I said £5 a share, yet I didn't. This was also one of TC's claims, which again cast serious doubt on their reading comprehension levels.

You just seem angry at being proved to be incorrect in your statement that people "can't accept the facts"

You could use this as a learning experience to better yourself, but it seems you're chosing not to.

So I refer to an event with TC regarding option extensions prior to filtering them. Most likely the event that resulted in me adding them to the filter list. That's not exactly hard to understand is it?

You mentioned TC had made a comment. I replied to your post. Your attempts to call out me out for hypocrisy around filtering are pretty poor

TC is very firmly filtered and has been for a long while

As have none of the opinions of those who think the company will fail (except maybe those saying "Xp next week" when the sp is at X.1p.

It's rather tragic you have clearly had to create a new account. Which one were you previously? What rubbish were you posting that got you banned?

You say you made "opinions", but you declared them as "facts" which is what I'm calling you out on.

Could the war and sanctions make it harder to raise / make a sale? Sure they could. Is it certain they do? No it's not. Perfectly reasonable to have that opinion, and to voice it, but you listed it as a fact that people cannot accept.

TC claimed the options had expired when the RNS stated they were extended (as did the next RNS about them too). I worry for your sanity if you're aligning with that perennial irritant.

Care to share this reason and also which poster you used to be on this board?

And yet all your opinions are negative. What a surprise? A newish poster with no balance in what they post. Only negative.

Who did you used to be (or still are) on this board?

And you claim I predicted £5 a share.(Much like another poster liked to do (and probably still does)).

So you seem unable to understand the difference between fact and opinion, and also claim I predicted £5 a share when I clearly did not.

You seem as illiterate as TC

You find it strange that you claimed people couldn't accept facts, I asked you what facts these were, and you gave a list of facts people clearly accept along with opinions you are claiming as fact?

Very odd that you seem to not understand this.

As to your point about asking a basic question. You have asked about what another poster has written. Not sure what that has to do with anything, as by definition it'll clearly be an opinion, no matter how certain the poster may be.

Who did you used to be out of interest?

We can, but let's be clear here, no "guarantee" exists for a sale by year end. No one on the BoD has stated that so it's an opinion of yours you seem to be dressing up as fact. Probably so you can complain about it at a later date.

I'm not out to "get you" here, I'm just asking you to justify your statement that people can't accept the facts. I believe this exchange has shown that your statement is incorrect.

You'll have to point out where I have twisted any "facts" there.

I agree with your facts. It's your opinions that I may have a differing view on.

As for shortly, yes, that seems to have been a poorly chosen word given what has happened. Do I think such a word was chosen to be deliberately misleading or have events just taken over? Massive dividend. Well the jury's is still out on that one isn't it as there hasn't been a sale yet. If / when a sale comes, one can only really judge that statement.

I guess, from my interpretation of what you write, you think the BoD are corrupt, and this is all a big scam right?

You stated people can't accept the facts, yet you list many facts that people more than happily accept.

I guess what you mean is that people won't accept your opinion of what these facts mean for the company. I also notice a few opinions creeping into your fact list already.

No mining plan: Agreed, a fact

Likely cant raise: An opinion, not a fact

Can't sell the concentrate: Again, an opinion. The fact is, that we haven't sold the concentrate as at the last official communications.

Insider that sold out: Yes, they did. They claimed a cash call. You either believe that or you don't. You're opinion of that is that it was suspect right? I'm willing to take it at face value. Also, it was well before the war so I see no reason this has any impact on the current circumstances.

Board speech: An opinion, yet again. Seems to be you just being a meanie really.

So in summary, you had so many facts to write out you couldn't write them all out, yet about half of your most pertinent ones are opinions.

I'm rather surprised you haven't mentioned the assets are located in a company that is currently at war, or that the SP is whatever the SP is at time of posting. Again, more actual facts which I'm pretty sure everyone accepts as being true.

So, it goes back to that you really mean your interpretation of the facts is that the company is doomed, and you think people who interpret them in a different way are wrong? So it's not actually people not accepting facts?

As for the positives, the BoD have stated multiple parties are undertaking DD and that they are hopeful for a sale by the end of the year. These are statements from the people that should know the best what is going on and, given the nature of the war in Ukraine, I am inclined to believe that they are telling the truth about what is happening and their expectations for when it will conclude.

Unteresting that you think people can't accept sone of these.

5 years and not sold. Correct, it hasn't yet. But then nothing can be sold until it's sold. Communications from the BoD suggest the process is ongoing and are hopeful for year end.

I think most people accept there hasn't been a sale yet.

No DFS. Correct, but as stated in the RNS, the most recent one needs to be signed off by the authorities or something to that effect. Again, I'd argue everyone accepts this as true otherwise we would be discussing the DFS

Correct. Again, as it wasn't disclosed I think we all accept this. Not really sure in it's relevance to anything

Money gone. More a question than a fact. Was it not declared recently it was moved to the subs?

Court Cases : nope, they just haven't mentioned them as they don't feel they matter

Lies: opinion, not fact.

Yes, you do need to go on, as so far there is nothing there people aren't accepting as true

Feels like you're avoiding the simple question tbh.

If you have too many to list, maybe go with your "top 5"

So what you are saying is that the "facts" you speak of don't exist, as you can't reply with them here?

Wondering which "facts" you are alluding to there Sirplacealot

Probably a pandemic and a war that's holding things up

Well Del, I guess the chance for shareholders to change things was at the AGM.

Given the BoD was hopeful of a sale by the end of the year, I'm surprised by all the noise given there are about 2.5 months left.