Adrian Hargrave, CEO of SEEEN, explains how the new funds will accelerate customer growth Watch the video here.
"Shortly" is subjective, I'll give you that it's been longer than most would claim shortly to be.
"Massive dividend", well an asset sale hasn't happened yet so the jury is still out there. Too early to say whether its factually incorrect or not.
But I think you know all this, and are just trying to cause disruption
You don't know what's going on so you can't comment on that.
You also said you expected the options to lapse, so you don't exactly have much of a track record of being correct with your baseless speculation
Not seeing anyone blindly ramping the share CALLs, if I did I'd call them out too.
If you think I'm playing the victim, I would seriously question your reading comprehension.
Could you provide some evidence of what you claim is happening?
I can't, but I don't claim that I can. Unlike those whom I point this fact out to.
I disagree, given the nature of the project, the political climate and the confidentiality required, I wouldn't consider it shambolic. IMO, it's a rather blinkered assessment, borne from frustration over timelines not aligning with personal circumstances.
They may wish to share but are bound by NDA's, none of us know.
The BoD did seem to imply things were close, then war happened. Whilst it won't impact their ability to sell, it'll likely cause delays IMO. Not really the BoDs fault there IMO
As for lies, whilst it is AIM, there is still a decent level of regulation, so I doubt the NOMAD would allow RNS's to be released that weren't truthful.
All in all, there will be an RNS at some point saying sale or no sale, and if it's a sale, for what price.
Only then will anyone actually know for certain
Not really seeing why you're attacking me.
Nearly every "it's doomed!" style poster provides nothing to back up their claims of scam or sham. I call them out on it.
Note, I'm not saying it will/wont go well, just pointing out the factually incorrect statements from our resident disruptors.
Notice how none of them can provide any logic to support their positions of "lies" or "scam".
Can you support your stance of "shambles" with anything? Again, without insider information, I doubt you will have anything of substance beyond "sp is down" or "it hasn't happened yet so it wont"