Member Info for SteJSteJ

I'm so glad you are posting this on the boards of all miners with assets in Russia as this clearly applies to them too. They all need to know!

Oh wait, you aren't! Why is that?

Why didn't you raise this concern at the AGM?

Please leave this board in peace and just come back if the doom you foresee comes to pass

So no point in asking the question to the BoD but you continue to post on here?

What an odd mindset. It's almost like you have a vendetta against the company for some reason.

Why didn't you ask the query at the AGM Toffers?

The interesting thing, should any offer come, will be whether we are told what the DFS values the company at vs the offer. (I.e. will we be aware of the potential war discount).

At least then, shareholders will have an idea of what value could be realised in a post war environment.

If shareholders are only told, offer of xxp, then it'll be a different kettle of fish

Just because you keep repeating things doesn't make them any truer.

You still fail to answer why you didn't raise any of this at the AGM yesterday

The big thing here is that the market seems unmoved by the AGM.

The market doesn't seem to care about the Rosgeo going. Nor does it seem to care for the positive comments from the board.

It also appears to be unconcerned about the court cases.

If anything, it seems concerned about the war.

Who is more likely to have the right opinion, Toffers or the market?

BoD says it doesn't.

Again, AGM was yesterday. Why didn't you ask these questions then? Put those 80 shares to good use

Although, Luton haven't stated their aim is to win the PL, so it's not quite the same analogy. But point taken

50m-100m? Has that been RNS'd somewhere?

If it was worth so little, I doubt the sale process would have been taking as long as it is

Due to the war. Where political pressure was applied to distance from Rusdia and indexes selling out due to mcap fall.

Why, what is your conspiracy for it?

Agm results out

You seem to spend a lot of your life on here for the sake of a £2.40 investment

Another perennial agitant. Filter and ignore

I wpuldn't be surprised if an acceptable ballpark figure was discussed and informally agreed at the time of the credible party RNS. Sure, this may have moved a bit due to the war and what not, but I expect all parties are on the same page so an offer could come rather quickly once everything is lined up and legal.

Roll on the next 5 months and see what materialises

Assets are basically the company. What a stupid statement KRSS

Total paid isn't a 15% increase, but the figure any holder gets is 0.92/0.80 which is a 15% increase.

So the buyback has reduced the sharecount and increased the dividend for those remaining shares

Missing word in your transcript I believe is "...who..."

Transcript there in the message you replied to.

In the meeting, it was shortly after the 16min mark.

If you had attended, you would have heard it yourself

I'd imagine it's the obvious reason that it is legally covered by NDA's to keep the party anonymous until an offer is made.

Not that you care, as you are always negative about the company.

Could have been a good question to ask at the AGM if you actually cared enough

Another perennial agitant that Rickstars. Just filter and ignore. What they say is of no consequence to any