REMINDER: Our user survey closes on Friday, please submit your responses here.
How are you so bad at reading, SM? The UN can do as it pleases. Everything I've said I'm relation to Ecuador's president breaking international law is to do with investor confidence, as that's the only bit that could matter to us. May have escaped your notice if you're not a good reader, but we're not a producing company so we don't have to worry about sanctions 🤦♀️
Come on, SM- do better if you want to talk.
Electric van? You've lost me, add.
We don't do many new builds, either- leave that to the shoddy developers.
Not sure what 1981 is but go to a site and find me one person who doesn't use poppet or treacle to get a bite out of blokes who think they know a thing or two. Okay, sweetheart? See- it gets your back up, doesn't it angel? Got to learn to be a bit more confident in your own skin, add. Lighten up!
This previous incarnation hang up of yours is more fixed thinking, or perhaps deflection, but I'll let it slide.
I'm very happy to be proven wrong about a sale here, add, but I don't believe it will happen this year. There are countless things that would change my mind on that, but they are all exceptionally unlikely to happen. And, as I've said before, I'm not negative on this share - I'm realistic. You don't come to be trading at a fraction of your value over 2 years if your making good moves- that's not how the market works. There are deep concerns about solg, some of which I share, others I don't. Do I recognise positives? Yes- we've got great historical drilling results and we secured a lot of concessions (albeit these become a liability if we can't finance them).
It's nice to see you coming round to the idea that it's bad to break the Geneva convention, add. Baby steps. Do I think this will be quickly forgotten about? It depends if the president can now take some steps to reassure the international community- time will tell. If he doubles down on an exceptionalist, 'rules don't apply' MO then he's toast. You're a good example of someone staging a climb down 👍
Got away my 9.8 short at 9.3ish, good for a few tokens. Sitting out today as it's a proper work day- 11 sites due to wrap in the next week and not a trustworthy snagger anywhere in the north.
DD is the issue here, add. The UN confirming that this is a violation of the Geneva convention simply cannot be a good thing for the president's chances of attracting investment. There is violence and corruption in lots of the countries where majors invest, but blatant disregard for 'inviolable' international law is a troubling precedent. Majors sign IPAs which are underpinned and upheld by an adherence to international law. They can cope with the occasional coup or assassination, bribery or extortion, because the ruling parties in other jurisdictions are smart enough to adhere to the relevant bits of these legal agreements. Ecuador has just clearly demonstrated that it won't.
Will this harm investment in the country? Only time will tell. It doesn't matter to us anyway, as the rampers' "imminent sale" isn't happening this year (yes, slug is wrong about that, too. Can't blame Apple's autocorrect for all his stupidity)
Sales require buyers, Eloro - a lesson Scott and Bob have learnt this year. And news about a president with little regard for international law likely won't help confidence. Majors are used to investing in volatile regions, but knowing that the man co-signing agreements with you doesn't think he has to honour them might be troubling.
Think some of the ramper crowd tried to make a similar arguement about several other vacant positions last year, ftjny, but it turned out solg were just very slow to fill them. Occam's razor says it's the same story here 👍
Again, you're not helping yourself cash.
Do you admit you were wrong about slander? And tracking posters? Or are you doubling down? Or ignoring your error? It's fine to just admit you didn't know what you were talking about- no judgement here. But if you double down, literally everyone here will be able to see how stupid you've been. Take your choice...
Who are you seeking to infantilize, mathers? Is cash a school child? If so, it might explain why he doesn't understand slander or web protocol, and why he seemingly can't keep up with a conversation. Good shout.
Sorry cash, son- good luck with your exams sport 👍
Called many things, add- I won't ask you to go back through my whole history because you have a life, I'm sure, but they're there. I told everyone we'd have an AGM '23 because there wouldn't be a sale (against a strong rampy narrative at the time). I told you we'd dip below 6p against an instance that we wouldn't, and even bought some shares at 5.9p to prove it. I said slug has brought at the wrong time just this week and sure enough the price dropped all day. I said bob wouldn't be able to get anything away fast and smart, and many many months later I'm right about that, too. I can go on?
Cash, only a total turnip would think that what's posted here would impact the SP. I could announce that there is a sale coming tomorrow and it wouldn't move the needle one jot. The sooner the rampers here realise that the better, right? Please, everyone, hold on to your shares. Don't crash the SP on my behalf!
You said something similar last time, add, but I've just kept being proven right... So there has been no fall, no pain. Are you not setting yourself up for embarrassment when, once again, I'm right? Or does it only work one way? 😁
Is that the sound donkeys make when the penny drops?
Do far, in just the last hour from you, we've had:
1)posters here can be traced (they can't)
2)'legal routes' can challenge statements between anonymous bb posters (they can't)
Want to make it 3 or are you retiring to come back with another alias which hasn't been so comprehensively trashed?