Member Info for Stackhigh

Add, the status quo for Solg - it's normal MO - is regular fundraising events in order to continue at a glacial pace towards either production (I don't trust them to achieve this) or a sale. That's exactly what you can expect for the next couple of years, as I have been saying for ages. Look at the last 10 years for some clues 👍

All this 'someone has to move for this soon' is utter tosh, as it always has been, peddled by scuba divers who bought in without understanding the company. By all means trade the movement in the meantime. At the moment people are doing nicely buying at the bottom of 9 and selling 7% higher a couple of days later (and repeat). Is 9p the bottom? I wouldn't bet on it. Once holders wake up to the fact there's nothing but fundraises coming, the prop here might give way to a lower buy in 👍

Can you all see why it's going to be a few years more before there's any action here? As I've always told the brainless rampers - this has a long time to run. No imminent sale.

Perhaps the penny will start to drop now?

FN definitely didn't value Solg at $10b.

Just find the bit where I said you were 'involved in the debate' then come back to me 👍

You're doing nothing to dispell the notion that you might be the same person behind slug's many usernames... He's not that bright either, as you'll have gathered if you're not him!

Was that not you posting at 16:33? Taking issue with emojis? Looks a lot like your username in the label.

Nothing grown up about this platform, cash. Slug doesn't understand GCSE chemistry, and neither it would seem does jez. I'm perfectly fine with the occasional emoji- I think some of you would benefit from some crayon diagrams anyway...

Seriously though, I can't fathom the falling into line with a ring leader who is so clearly wrong and in a corner. If I was so minded, I'd suspect that you, jez and slug are one and the same poster, but I think there might actually just be a lot of similar simpletons 🤷‍♂️

And jezzoo, the bit I had to clarify for you before was the argument between slug and quady over civil engineering companies. You seemed to have missed the bit where, in contrast to quady, slug said civil engineering companies didn't build mines for majors, and then there was a raft of evidence that they did, and he got embarrassed (again).

I think you can and do read these posts, but you choose to take the side that's proven wrong each time. I'm not sure why- is it loyalty to slug? Or just to be provocative? Either way, it's a bit odd, but never mind.

I know it's a perverse pleasure, but I really enjoy how every time slug is made to look stupid he resorts to exactly the same line. I can't diagnose ASD, but anyone can seem some clear traits. ♥️

Sorry, jezzoo, I mistook you for someone who understood the basics of energy transfer. Entirely my bad- you go on saying whatever you like 👍

Pedantic would be picking up on minor details (like someone not using 'pedant' correctly). It's not pedantic to point out that cars can't run on water. That's just about having a functioning brain.

He's still at it, poor guy.

Again, to clarify, no car "runs on" water. He got taken in by an April fool and is trying to get himself off the hook of embarrassment.

Cars with onboard electrolysers would "run on" electricity (a source of energy he claims to hate).

Why are we talking about this? What other stupid thing has slug said today that he is trying to cover in unrelated car nonsense?

Jezzoo, I'll translate for you (again)

"Runs on" is used to denote the source of energy for a vehicle. Petrol cars "run on" hydrocarbons from crude oil.

A car will never, ever, ever "run on water", as slug said. He's thick, so he doesn't understand that, but has since tried to double down.

"Solar" is energy from the sun. This could be converted into chemical potential energy in elemental hydrogen, via electrolysis of water. Whether the vehicle "runs on" solar is up for debate- it's one step removed if it actually "runs on" hydrogen.

Neither is as stupid as saying a car "runs on" water, which marked slug out as the simpleton he is. No science degree, no head for numbers, no smarts. Just an angry bar prop who lost his wife to a civil servant.

Slug still not explained where his nonsense about engineering companies not building mines for majors came from?

Of course he won't answer because he can't admit he was wrong

#theshoefits

Interesting take, SM. Have you written a lot of sound bites for CEOs? It is very telling that he didn't say "Solg will not build Cascabel", which is the straightforward way to word that, if it is the sentiment. Instead, he caught himself and deliberately, repeatedly, said 'solg are mine finders, not mine builders'.

What is your reason why he didn't say "solgold will not build Cascabel"? Do you think he just likes clunkier sentence structures? Lol

You must have missed it, jezzoo

Quady explained the "Solg are not mine builders" comment by pointing out it would be an engineering company that built the mine.

A clueless slug came windmilling in and said this was nonsense, and asked other to name examples of what quady was saying.

Then a poster came in and did just that.

So slug, once again, embarrassed himself. People in glass houses (and water-powered cars) should be careful what they say.

We have our answer from the moron: double down even though his original statement was proven wrong.

Classic, pathetic slug.

So just to clarify, slug said:

"Name me a “civil engineering” company engaged to build a large mine by a big miner"

And thanks to some input from someone with a brain, we have:

"In January 2013, MacMahon secured its largest ever contract from Fortescue Metals Group after it was awarded a $1.8 billion contract for the Christmas Creek mining operation's expansion. The five-year contract would deliver all aspects of mine operations, including drill and blast, overburden removal, ore harvesting, maintenance of equipment and associated services"

So now I wonder- will slug apologise to quady, go quiet for a bit, try to weasel out of what he said or double down and pretend he's not thick as treacle.

This must be at least the 10th time he's been publicly proven to be a ranty fool. Classic bar prop.

Ouch.

🦶🐌 ⚰️

Https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(24)00189-9/fulltext

Original publication of the study behind the headlines. Significant portion of the tiny sample size has pre-existing genetic issues that show strong correlation with heart problems.

If slug is claiming these are caused by mRNA (which doesn't ever enter the nucleus and therefore cannot alter the genetic code 🤦‍♂️) he is going to have to resort to stories about time travel, because these genetic variants in the study subjects existed before the vaccines.

Such epic stupidity from someone who claims to have a science degree 🤣

No wonder he believes in water-powered cars.

Now, back to Solg everyone. Ignore the attention seeking fool posting here every Friday and Saturday night because his ex left him.

It's pretty good though, isn't it cash? That numpty still doubles down on the idea you can power a car using a stable oxide of hydrogen 🤣

As for the fundraise, if you want to take the risk, it's your money. Some of us will make a bit more by timing it well 👍

Https://www.riazor.org/news/water-car-end-gasoline/608/

Oh my God, slug was right!

Oh no, wait. It runs on electricity. Turns out you have to be able to read to understand.

Awkward.

Are people surprised that 2 days of trading after 'big news', Solg is still at 9.8p? Almost like this news was already factored in to the 🐶 💩 share price

Wait until the emergency loan runs out before getting excited and topping up. Keep your powder dry for the next necessary fundraise, if you're allowed to take part.