Member Info for Stackhigh

Great to see slug imparting his usual intellect to the debate, but the question remains. Why has the market responded negatively to the news of this loan? Why hasn't there been an increase in buying, if the company is to be believed about a strong possibility of a major finance package? Anyone?

RNS has not caused a flurry of buying? Do LTHs here believe they know something other investors don't, or is it the other way round? Are those who are too deep in just blinded by confirmation bias?

Price has dropped since announcement of loan. Almost like it's a desperate funding action. Get ready with the 'dont base things on spot SP, stack'.

Nobody needs a reminder that this is 50% down in a year.

Slug imagines conversations with BoD members in the same way as he imagines muscles, girlfriends and phantom trades.

And because he's a very clever little soldier, he'll now post the same thing he's been posting for days. He's a hoot... 🤦‍♂️

"Given that we could have avoided this by raising more funds, what does this tell us?"

How do you know we could have raised more funds, Add? Was that in the RNS or are you speculating?

"Q, the track record of the company in terms of delivering what it says is abysmal."

I wouldn't worry. According to the posted quoted above, add, it's just hot air anyway to try and explain away the need for an emergency loan

"Q, the track record of the company in terms of delivering what it says is abysmal."

Who said this?

Any other errors? Because I've called it right more than most, as you well know.

You got me confused, I fhink

Can't find that post, add?

As I said already, I'm definitely a twat. But that's a choice. I can stop... I'm not sure slug can stop being thick. Nor does he appear to be able to love, care or comprehend. Poor little critter.

I think SM is (rightly) worried about what else I've found in his posting history. Same reason slug filtered me- my guess is that SM, Add and co will do the same when they realise that their past stupidity neatly highlights why we shouldn't trust them now. Years of being wrong, and their posts today will join that line up over the next 18 months.

"There's something big going on"... Yeah, right...

Now you've got my typo out of your system, care to explain why you were either wrong then or I am right now? Really don't mind which you pick - you look like a stupid c*** either way 👍

No need for a vote- I know I'm a thorn in your side...

1) temperature doesn't measure anything

2) CO2 doesn't absorb energy

3) gdp increased comparatively under thatcher

4) COVID vaccines weren't tested

5) interest rates will hit zero in 2024

6) Toyota make a water powered engine

I'm forgetting some, but these are just some of Slug's most embarrassing brain farts. Go ahead, vote me as whatever you like... I'll never be as thick as slug.. nor as deplorable in my view of women and girls.

Nothing, SM? You gone quiet. This game is to f***ing easy when the other players are such simple tools.

Don't worry, slug- there's plenty to embarrass you with too. Each time you've laid it on thick with quady... Going to have to row back now.. 🤣

Quote from SM... How times change

"How much dilution to build Alpala. The company says minimal. I believe them."

Quady, were the company to say anything other than this the share price would tank."

So SM agrees that the company saying non-dilutive is BS. But because he can't stick to a story, he now magically believes them.

Funny that... 🤣🤣

I think when we do secure funding (not just taking out a loan) we will find it to be a car crash. And there is absolutely no doubt that certain funds won't be able to invest in Ecuador if the international arbitration issues persist.

Want me to go back through your history, SM? We all know you rampers are FoS 👍

The fundamental disagreement here, add, is that I believe this is a loan drawn from desperation. It's not that we're going to make more money than the loan costs is in interest. I don't believe we're using it for Capital structure optimisation. And as a loss making company, it ain't for tax. So... Any answers, or just personal criticism?

Not sure the rampers here would let it get to a penny.... Though didn't you say it would never go below 20p, DBW?

Your opinions don't count because of your posting history 👍

Do successful companies take loans, or raise funds from investors? Just answer that question with either option, then start to understand why taking a loan is never a preferred route taken by good companies.

It's not about my opinion on what's best for financing. I just pointed out that Scott's non-dilutive claim was nonsense. The other day I thought you were slowly getting there, realizing that money doesn't come without giving something away.

If you're happy with today's admission of failure, good for you. I get the impression your investment strategy is based on blind hope rather than reality anyway, so it's little wonder the company can do no wrong.

Oh, and would someone tell slug that he's the one claiming to top up at these prices... God knows why. Some of us are safely out, bar a hedge.