Member Info for Spikeyj

Nope, hardly hindsight re CTAG, 1982. i’ve been a very consistent sceptical poster regarding cloudtag and amit’s umpteen promises, including back when cloudtag was still listed and trading in AIM all those years ago.

it wouldn’t surprise me if he gives yet another rampy ‘update’ by the end of the month, since he’s quite good at churning out updates when he chooses. but sadly for those stuck with cloudtag shares, that’s very, very different from actually delivering on all those pie in the sky promises and handing over cold hard shiny cash to pis still stuck with cloudtag shares.

“There isn’t one person reading these forums that thinks I must never invest where a CEO might be dodgy.”

i think you are very, very wrong. and if you are not, you should be. (- and peeps really, seriously should avoid investing where a CEO definitely *is* dodgy, not just “might be”.)

your 25/8 tip-off proved to be utter b***s***. now we’re waiting to see how how your thursday tip-off goes.

I’m not so sure it’s been “pointless bickering”. anything that helps prevent people like amit luring ordinary & honest pis deeper into his swamp is worthwhile, imo.

Hubba 16:33: “… even though not one bit of evidence of that happening since the 2018 fundraise…”

i wonder why hubba is pretending not to remember that umpteen millions of additional shares were issued *after* 2018? - that data is clearly visible from cloudtag’s own website, and it’s been highlighted on here before.

Why?

“There is ample evidence ranging from his own website updates to recorded personal messages he has sent other people.”

? how would statements made by amit, whether that’s public ones on the cloudtag website, or private ones made to pis by phone etc, show that there was any change in how truthful or trustworthy amit is being? … there would need to be some kind of demonstrable, concrete connection to other things *happening*, and being observed /verified by independent others.

(…e.g. if for example amit were to tell people there’s going to be a listing on a public exchange, that proves nothing; the evidence comes if that exchange ever actually confirmed that…)

amit yakking a bunch of stuff, yet again, public or private, means nowt on its own. all it shows is just that someone calling themself amit is still talking.

“You can read about his other trade exits and gauge his wealth.”

? are you under the impression that the richer someone is, the more honest they are likely to be? - stunningly naive, if so. night night.

(… you do realise that your 4th para rather contradicts your 5th para, don’t you? —-if there really were “Israeli investors who would get to him first”, as you claim, then that would constitute a pretty strong motivation to keep the fairy tale spinning, eh.)

“Five grand here and ten grand there” seriously under-represents the amounts of money that have been leeched from private investors. ? surely you must know that?

There is a *lot* of previous evidence about just how truthful and trustworthy amit actually is.

? what makes you think he is acting any differently at this stage?

Nope, you could just say, couldn’t you.

? why so coy?

“he’s a lying Jeremy Hunt”

? who do you mean, 1982? - which “he”is the person who whispered that supposed “intelligence” to you?

12.38, makes this chatboard sounds like a seance.

… i don’t think “intelligence” is the right word, 1982.

LOL

? what has winnifrith got to do with cloudtag at this stage? - genuinely baffled what the believers are on about … is this the kind of thing amit whispers in their ears??

LOL, wrong again, notspart. i have no connection whatsoever, personally or professionally with TW.

? out of mild interest, what’s your history with winnifrith, pikeyK? - you seem to reference him a fair bit.

All sounds a bit father ted.

“that money was only resting in my account …”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9wCMSSjTKk

My bet would be, ‘great news’ (yet again, lol) but no ‘real hard evidence’.