Member Info for Spikeyj

Bigfatlad, you appear to misunderstand the roles of a nomad. they don’t act as a detective or auditor, checking up independently on the facts and figures that a company has supplied. their job is to advise the company’s BoD about their duties, and offer advice about regulations, wording / publication of RNSs etc … but it is *NOT* the nomad’s job to check up if what a company is saying is actually true / accurate or not — that’s down to the company itself.

nomad acts in good faith, based on what the company tells it.

I suppose one possible reason for a company of this kind not to sell a stockpile of concentrate would be to avoid a precise real world valuation of their stockpile, based on what third parties are really willing to pay, rather than internal ‘estimates’ alone … maybe this particular concentrate is not quite as concentrated as EUA initially hoped / claimed?

… schroedinger’s concentrate, it’s potentially worth a whole range of values, right up until the moment when someone opens up the box and checks what’s really in it when actually measured — is EUA dead or alive? - both perhaps, in a spooky quantum wave-function / AIM share kinda way.

Amit has previously posted video clips on the cloudtag website about media / conference presentations. — ? so perhaps he will soon post up something about his participation at the conference? (my guess would be, sometime like a stall in the foyer demonstrating how a stack of empty cardboard boxes can work for fun and profit, or a maybe a little sideshow booth to entertain delegates during their lunchbreak by demonstrating the age-old art of the shell game.)

… the point, as usual with cloudtag, is simply the utter lack of evidence that there is any real substance to the underlying ‘business’ and various announcements it’s issued over the years.

- it is, for instance, *conceivable* that they really *did* build a runway in the jungle … but if they did, there’s precious little evidence that anyone ever used it for anything!

- & it is, for instance, conceivable that amit did actually ‘participate’ in the conference in some way … but if he did, there’s b***** evidence of anything he did, said or presented, and zero evidence of any impact or anyone noticing. (? maybe the guy was just in and out like an NDA’d ninja?)

[Ones, not one’s, of course, etc etc, for those out there who get on on typos.]

I suspect you’re making the same mistake that i did initially Helx2. there are various dates given on different website links, presumably there from automated webcrawler apps, but it looks like the one’s that state 14/9 jsut do so because some presentations overlap with 14/9 beijing time (- but still only 13/9 NY time).

Sorry for my mistake about the conference, ended yesterday not today — no evidence anywhere that amit had anything to do with it, let along anything substantive (… happy of course to be corrected if others can highlight public domain evidence about amit presenting etc.)

“Back near end of day trading 8th of sept @367.89…”

remarkable how good some traders are, when posting in hindsight … tends to a bit more interesting if trades are declared when made, eh.

Meanwhile, one day left for amit to surface at the conference … ? maybe he’ll be the keynote speaker at the final plenary session? … given his towering reputation in the global healthcare world, i’m sure all the participants will be agog.

More importantly imv, just provides further demonstration of consistent & purposeful strategy being executed in what appears to be fairly measured, step-by-step, way. i.e. good leadership, after previous CEOs had just muddled and messed for 20(+) years..

HITS, bear in mind that this is the same guy who thinks that entering into a contract for difference would be same as buying someone else’s shares from them — don’t expect too much.

Mr_Wolfe, firstly you are clearly trying to gain an unfair upper hand in the argument by canoeing in llangollen, and secondly, I think you must have moved his cheese again. bad wolf!

15:20, yup, sounds about right to me.

Sorry, i’ve got bit lost following this discussion … ? in what way is rags trying to suggest that wolfe has been trying to gain the “upper hand In a [sic] argument” by mentioning that he’s had a short break canoeing nr llangollen?

Yup.

“…surely not hard to get a loan for a few months when you have more than a quarter of a billion ‘definitely’ arriving imminently.”

… especially when you have a reputation like amit’s? - the cheque’s in the post, promise!

? why wouldn’t cloudtag just borrow cash to cover short-term admin /legal costs, if it is indeed true they have a signed and sealed contract delivering $275, 000, 000 cash within just weeks /months? - why not just borrow the money (- even from amit via a loan from him, especially since he knows the real value of what cloudtag has …) rather than tout extra shares to pis? - surely not hard to get a loan for a few months when you have more than a quarter of a billion ‘definitely’ arriving imminently.

ManFromDelMonti: “It’s been almost a year since the sale announcement, with solicitors and others constantly engaged…”. - but what’s the basis for this claim? - ? where is there even the slightest piece of independently verifiable evidence that anything of the sort is happening?!

Manfromdelmonti: “… his reputation hangs by a thread.” … truly hilarious. ? what kind of reputation does amit already have, given for instance those empty boxes at the display stand, the runway in the jungle, the countdown clock, the phantom distribution agreement with those second chance golf accessories folk, getting booted off AIM because cloudtag’s nomad quit and they couldn’t get another one, the disastrous “miscommunication” with novum, the non-recruitment of hugh risebrow or his clone, the promised IPO that never happened, the ‘show of hands’ vote, the promise to improve governance by recruiting additional directors, and then all the failed update timelines??

(PS you don’t seem to have even tried to answer why cloudtag wouldn’t just *borrow* cash to cover short-term admin/legal costs, if is indeed true that they have a signed and sealed contract delivering $275,000,000 within weeks/months - why not just borrow the money, rather than keep phoning round the poor old pis to flog parcels of shares??)

I don’t know what price amit’s been trying to sell for, because no-one’s yet owned up publicly to buying any more, let alone said what price they paid. … i used 1p in my post at 23:16, because you yourself used “just a penny” in your own 22:48 ( - it’s also a price others have mentioned over the years, and there’s no independently verifiable evidence cloudtag has added any kind of value since, is there?)

but it would indeed be very interested to hear from folks like pointz/ trombone about actual price levels being touted around.

i believe that you have used plenty of IDs previously on this board. jmo, of course. but i do understand of course that you would not want to admit that, either. i don’t believe that you are actually an investor in cloudtag. i think you are simply here to promote the shares - again, that’s just my personal opinion about you.

re directors not being able to deal in a closed period … don’t be silly! this is not an AIM share, it’s just a private unlisted share, registered in a very ‘relaxed’ overseas jurisdiction. amit can pretty much do what he wants, when he wants, with next to zero disclosure requirements, and no checks and balances from any other directors, nomad, etc etc.

… & would i accept payment in cloudtag shares for anything?? - again, don’t be silly, of course not, they are utterly worthless!

g’night, see you around no doubt.

Your challenge to martin was for him to *sell you his shares*, not for him to enter into a spreadbet or CFD with you, but with no change in the legal ownership of the underlying asset (i.e. the registered share ownership).

martin cannot sell you the underlying asset, unless cloudtag (/amit) decides that it will register third party transfers after all.

so if you just want to challenge martin to enter into a CFD or spreadbet with you, then just say that ( — rather than muddle that up with buying his shares! - ) and then explain to martin how you and he can practically make a trustworthy, legally enforceable agreement to do that, given your respective, and deeply untrustworthy, anonymous multi-ID’d avatar statuses.

**

? meanwhile, why would cloudtag issue shares at 1p to raise £110K for “ongoing legal and administrative bills as well as address a technical issue”, when it supposedly has $275,000,000 coming in very, very soon, with each of those shares supposedly then being worth circa 22p / share?

… it would be very, very crazy to raise money in that way at this juncture, *IF* the deal is real.

compare; if a little oil explorer struck lucky and then sold a licence/well to a bigger fish for the equivalent of 22p per share arriving in just a few months time, they would *not* then do a placing at 1p / share to cover admin expenses etc. for those few months before the big money arrives in their account.

… if cloudtag needed say £110K, but with the $275million deal done, why not just get a bridging cash loan for a few weeks/months, e.g. from rich mr amit himself??

… or if amit really, really did want to raise £110K by selling 1p shares, then surely it would be way more sensible to sell them to himself, knowing that in a matter of weeks he could pocket a huge profit since each of those shares would get a 22p payout? — (? is amit really so altruistic that he would want to sell *other* people such amazingly discounted shares, with the quarter billion just about to arrive?)