Member Info for Spikeyj

Yes.

GM402: “The proposed new tax is unwelcome, no question about it but i doubt it’ll be the cause of any sale failing.”

sure, i tend to agree with that. you may well be right that the share price will at some point go above 3p, so gl with that. (where you and i might differ? is whether there’s any kind of sale at all coming that’s worth even a fraction of the current mcap - me, i rather doubt there will be - but that may not matter anyway for s/p if they try to get a little spike up to get a placing away or allow more insiders to exit.)

Yes, to some extent, though i think there are many indications that the rule of law now in russia is even weaker now that it’s been for the last 20 years.

i suspect most pis lured into EUA never really understood what kind of country risk they were dealing with in the first place.

… the other issue it highlights with respect to russia, there is nothing really to stop putin from saying 10% in two months / two years time, time, or 2%, or 25%, 1%, 90%….. scarily unpredictable climate for business, subject to confiscation / punitive taxation etc at dictatorial whim.

property rights in russia primarily a matter of might is right rather than robust law.

Saudis could have all my BP shares for 999p, if they ask nicely (nah, tbh on second thoughts they could have them all for that price even if they were a bit rude about it.)

Chimers, my post this morning about amit’s reputation did not make any mention of social media platforms, so no idea what you are on about with your 08:29.

Re 13:14, i would guess that pretty much the same will happen as every other time there are further delay tactics. doubt this time round will be any different. … the true believers will still believe, and the paid shills will still pretend to be true believers, etc.

[* ‘honesty’ as in, the serious lack of it, obv!]

B1ll, 14:15, good reminder, thanks. IKN lost the bet but welched. good on wolfe for calling out his b******* to begin with. IKN’s character, reliability and honesty was already very obvious tbh, but the excuses & support he continues to get from certain others is useful commentary on them too.

Speaking of “another few brand new accounts”, sandwell’s pretty new, too, ain’t s/he?

11:02 re ACF report: “… and is no longer valid.”

it never was.

Remarkably stable share price. ? what is keeping it up at this bizarrely inflated price? - intriguing! … somebody busy in the background?

Consistent strategy.

Last year interims for ADME to end june 2022 came out on 29/9/22/

? … so nearly time to hear about this year’s sparkling interim results?

… i think amit does indeed have a ‘reputation’… but not a good one…

(certainly not since he steered AIM listed cloudtag to crash and burn so spectacularly after multiple unfulfilled promises and the disastrous ‘miscommunication’ [cough] re novum & the placing.)

personally, i think it’s quite likely that the nomad resigned precisely because of amit’s ‘reputation’ at that point, or what one might term the reputational risk to the nomad if they had stayed involved going forward. jmo.

Ragsrob: “… it appears something has created a sudden interest again…”

you wish! - there is no evidence at all of any such thing.

nor is there any info about whether or not other parties are “spending considerable amounts of money”on DD — zero evidence / data provided about that.

? “increase in reserves”? - again, that is just pure guessing on your part, rags. zero evidence published about increases/decreases etc. no public data at all released from the DFS.

c ya laters, alligators, some professional tasks calling.

Rags, i don’t know what you’re trying to say, i haven’t apologised about anything. they’ve been trying to sell the concentrate for ages, they’ve failed so far, and the ‘value’ keeps falling.

… and they *still* haven’t sold it, rags.

i do think they probably will end up selling it, but not for what they used to claim it was worth — potential buyers of the concentrate have EUA over a barrel.

10:09, ? then why has EUA been putting out RNS updates which claim they are actively trying to sell the concentrate including a tender offer which three parties have supposedly responded to, with EUA currently ‘evaluating’ three offers from them? — EUA would be actively misleading the market, *if* what you suggest is true (which i do *not* believe).

DimitryReacts: “Why would Eurasia halt mining metals at WK?”

… probably imo because it costs them more to mine that they can make by selling what they dig up. WK loses money, and very obviously they don’t have enough spare cash to keep running a loss-making mine just for the looks of it.