Member Info for Spikeyj

I wasn’t so much asking about the scenario where pis lose their legal beagle battle to get funds paid out to them … more about the scenario where no such funds exist in the first place. just curious.

“A 5% surcharge / fee against your investment…”

So if amitscigar is indeed a truthful and honest fellow, and genuinely was clever and astute enough to have bought significantly more than 26 million shares in cloudtag, then he would be asked to pay 5% of the sum he invested to do that? —- interesting —- he’s been a bit coy about his buy-in price, but let’s assume just for the sake of illustration that amitscigar bought 30,000,000 shares at 1p…. cost therefore £300,000 … so amitscigar would be asked to fork out £15,000 as an initial payment to hire some “legal beagles”? — what an excellent idea, I’m all in favour of people like amitscigar paying that.

…. ? btw, what would the beagles get paid in the end, and by whom, if it turns out that the ‘delayed funds’ simply don’t exist?

Do let me know if you would like to discuss cloudtag at some point, dougie. but in the meantime i’’ll leave you to your rather over-emotional ranting (which is, as you rightly say, rather repetitive).

atb, all honest and polite pis.

I neither know nor care who amitscigar is … simply calling him out as a fibber.

meanwhile, “special divi’s” - eh?? … you do know that this is about cloudtag shares, right? — cloudtag has never paid *any* kind of dividends, ordinary or special. (and i do not believe that it ever will.)

? do you really believe that amitscigar bought significantly more than 26 million shares in cloudtag, dougie? …. just another in a long line of pis here who tell porkies, such as mrcoffee, hubba, and 11984.

You’re coming across a bit emotional, dougie. i have no particular interest in your profit or loss, i genuinely don’t care either way whether you make or lose in stocks and shares.

no, i am not here “just to learn”, you misquote/ misremember — i am primarily here for interest and entertainment, tho’ occasionally there can be some learning points from watching how amit himself tries to play the cloudtag games. ( - i don’t see any learning points from watching folks like you, hubba, amitscigar etc.)

try to have a peaceful and calm day, chronically elevated cortisol levels would not be good for your blood pressure.

“He doesn’t have clue who the other players are”

? why would i care, dougie?

it would indeed be mildly interesting to know which chatboard IDs (if any) are used by amit or paid stooges, but other than that i’m not that fussed who any of you are.

one mark is pretty much the same as another mark in these situations, you were just money-bags to be tapped up until you ran dry.

Tbh, i am not entirely sure i believe you about your holding, amitscigar …. as shurely, not even you were ridiculously stupid enough to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds on utterly worthless cloudtag shares, were you!?

… what would you like to pretend your average price was for buying those umpteen million shares, amitscigar? —- say, for instance, 2p / share for 30,000,000 shares, would be a mere £600K, lol.

Re 14:35, amit’s told people all sorts of things. but not much ever seems based in reality.

so for sure, amit has sometimes said things which imply some kind of activity /involvement within the USA.

but just because amit says something, doesn’t mean it’s true.

so it seems entirely possible imv that there is absolutely no activity within the USA whatsoever, nor ever has been.

? how much did it cost you to buy those 26 million cloudtag shares, amitscigar?

… i make no claim at all to be a “real expert”, simply here for the fun and interest really, seldom a dull moment with amit around…

… but i would certainly hesitate to call anyone who bought millions of ctag shares an expert of any sort — sucker a more accurate term, i’d suggest.

I’m not sure why some peeps on this board keep referring to a six year limitation period. … because in the UK context, there is no single ‘statute of limitation’ …. rather, there are different limitations that apply for different kinds of alleged offences, and no limitations at all for some.

there is, for example, a six year limitation period that would generally apply to civil actions for debt recovery. but by contrast, for example, there is no statutory limitation period whatsoever for an indictable offence of criminal fraud; it could be prosecuted decades after the alleged offence took place. libel, to take another example, generally has a limitation period of only one year.

… so it does rather depend what kind of legal action different folks think might be relevant to cloudtag / amit?

This latest update already includes yet more backsliding (surprise surprise).

the previous update promised “smooth conclusion” to both transactions “during july” — but already that’s evaporating, since it is now only a “first tranche” of notifications, and only for holders of “paper certificates”, that is being promised for 24th july …

…so what about all the other ‘tranches’, and what about shareholders who do not have paper certificates?

[and as ever, getting a “notification” ain’t the same as receiving cash.]

… smooth conclusion, ABH’s hairy arze.

“You;re assuming it’s all true???”

lol, no, of course not.

08:44, leno, good post, straightforwardly funny for once.

Glancing back at that last update, it makes less and less sense (!) on re-reading.

amit emphasises that the supposed licence transaction and the supposed DaaP transaction are *separate* transactions, with different counterparties and different paying agents.

amit also emphasises that the Daap transaction has to come *after* the licence fee transaction. ( although he’s never explained why that would matter…)

but then, the excuse given for *delaying* the licence fee notifications is that the DaaP “announcement” will take place soon, in july [tick, tock].

… but if were true that the DaaP stuff must come *after* the licence fee thang, then it makes no sense at all to *delay* the licence fee notifications … surely, if anything, that would mean they need to *accelerate* the licence fee stuff, to ensure that it is completed before the DaaP announcement that ‘s meant to happen in less that two weeks from now?

none of it hangs together coherently.

21:30, “cynical negheads” are often right in relation to AIM stocks.

Ah, OK, apologies for my misunderstanding.

? Is it true, amitscigar, that you are the guy in the boat video, where amit allegedly phoned him up and asked him for money? — if so, *when* did that take place? (various amit apologists on this chatboard have tried to claim that happened years ago.)

“Total 52K for 26 million shares.”

no-one would pay you that. they are simply worthless. and not a snowball’s chance in hell of amit being “happy to transfer the 4 certificates [you] have, LOL!

? how much did you pay for that load of junk to begin with?

& no, of course i would not remotely trust either you or 1984, but fortunately i have no need to have any dealings with either of you.

“All the Negheads shot to pieces on SOLG.”

i know nothing about SOLG, nor about whatever the various arguments have been there between enthusiasts and sceptics. …. but just glancing quickly at the 3 year and 5 year historical share price charts, looks like the ‘negheads’ there have been right rather more often than the SOLG fanclub. uptick today no doubt very welcome to any trader types who bought in very recently, but those 3yr and 5yr graphs ain’t pretty.

[soz, off topic for EUA, while we await RNS that auditors have counted up the penny jar received in exchange for all those second-hand gingham table clothes.]