Member Info for Spikeyj

“All the Negheads shot to pieces on SOLG.”

i know nothing about SOLG, nor about whatever the various arguments have been there between enthusiasts and sceptics. …. but just glancing quickly at the 3 year and 5 year historical share price charts, looks like the ‘negheads’ there have been right rather more often than the SOLG fanclub. uptick today no doubt very welcome to any trader types who bought in very recently, but those 3yr and 5yr graphs ain’t pretty.

[soz, off topic for EUA, while we await RNS that auditors have counted up the penny jar received in exchange for all those second-hand gingham table clothes.]

(Although i do also take your point that i also would not trust amitscigar any further than i could throw pararotti. — by the way, what makes you think that he is the guy from the video of phone call to amit on a boat? … any evidence for that?)

C’mon, 1984, it’s not difficult - you are pretending that you are willing to pay somebody money for something - but with you already shown to be a blatant liar, sensible folks should be suspicious that you would not pay over the money that you say you will.

[soz, meant loud-mouthed, not ‘lord-mouthed’]

Waiting with interest to see how 1984 and amitscigar intend to consummate their arrangement …. no sign of them exchanging contact details yet.

various pis have previously claimed on this board that they wanted to buy more shares from another pi, but there has *never* been any feedback from any of those willy-waving exchanges to confirm that any such ‘contracts’ were ever set up. (phoenix was one of the last of those lord-mouthed supposed buyers, who then went very quiet.)

anyone considering a deal with 1984 should be wary of the considerable counterparty (welching) risk, given that 1984 has already shown himself to be a blatant liar regarding cloudtag.

(…. meanwhile, amitscigar, 26 million shares … wow, somebody sunk a daft sum of money into a tiny AIM company with zero income stream and no proven products or sales.!)

Careful now antha, or the hard man of the ctag chatboard might challenge you to a meet-up in the car park of his local ‘spoons. the guy’s a legend in his own lunchbreak.

22:00, “I like to tell it as it is…”

Nope. you bend over backwards, time after time, to try to find excuses for amit, no matter how feeble and far-fetched.

Whispering, 19:14. = amit apologist, pure and simple.

Denzal, atb & gl.

Nope, whispering, cloudtag does not upset me at all.

but yep, i do dislike folks like amit and the harm they can cause to ordinary, honest pis.

the investment world would be a far better place if companies like this did not exist. aimho.

Whispering, please explain, what do you think the point would be for anyone with an outstanding short position to post on the cloudtag chatboard, why would they bother? — if amit has been telling the truth, and cloudtag has indeed already fully completed large and lucrative deals, so that shareholders will be sent big payouts, then how could any posts by any shorters make any difference whatsoever to that?

… several posters have previously tried to suggest that sceptical posts come from ctag shorters, but none have ever managed to offer any reason why a shorter would bother … if amit’s been lying, shorters don’t need to worry, if amit’s been telling the truth, big deals have already been fully completed with payment on the way.

[purely for the sake of discussion … i am not short, nor do I believe that there are any outstanding significant short positions in cloudtag.]

14:06, there’s a difference between amit saying he wants to quell speculation, as versus whether speculation has actually been quelled.

best way for amit to ‘quell speculation’ would have been for him to pay people the money he promised them. but he hasn’t.

Pikeyk 09:33: “Why are you so worried about other people’s thoughts? … [ ] I couldn’t care less what you think so why the obsession?”

Lol! — that from an ID set up exclusively to attack & mock posters who are sceptical of amit and cloudtag, which has never, ever tried to comment on or analyse the company or its business, never commented on any other share, and was started up right around the same time amit began pumping out‘updates’ about big deals and impending payouts. the pikeyk ID just operates to attempt to distract from, or denigrate, criticisms of amit/cloudtag — amit’s little helper.

The BoD of WRN issued many, many updates, supposedly to keep shareholders and the markets ‘informed’. the criminal trial of several of the key players from WRN is due to start in the high court this september, with POCA orders in place for several years now to freeze assets of some of them.

i’m sure there are many differences between WRN and CTAG. but the idea that multiple updates equates to ‘compliance” is utterly ridiculous …. firstly, in a trivial sense, because st vincents regs do *not* require that a company registered there issues such updates …. but secondly, and far more importantly, updates are only worthwhile for shareholders if the content of the updates is truthful, accurate, and can be relied upon. —-> pumping out endless untrue garbage as updates is not “compliance” in any meaningful sense.

“Far too well orchestrated…”

30+ updates, with umpteen illiterate and garbled promises, ever-broken and ever-changing, and whispering thinks that’s “well orchestrated” - wow!!

So far, so good.

[inclined to agree, that is, that if pis were going to attempt legal action, they should have tried it a long time ago … rather less inclined to believe that FCA/SFO will “genuinely take an interest”. jmo.]

Antha, inclined to agree.

the thing that baffles me about tim’s 07:16 is, why now?

(… since the cloudtag games have been blindingly obvious for a very long time.)

Added a little (partial swap for a few aviva, tho’ aviva remains significantly larger holding)

I’m sure there is a regular flying pig courier service that shuttles back and forth regularly between amit and the world-wide network of regulators.