Member Info for Spikeyj

? why 6/1, dk?

[soz, business, not building!]

16:44, the ‘Richard98’ account has not gone, it’s still open on lse, just no posts under that name since 1/11.

that’s the odd bit about opening up lots of new accounts to post exactly the same content; he doesn’t need to, since he could simply continue using ‘richard98’ … i mean, it’s not like he’s trying very hard to pretend to be anyone else! [very stretchy behaviour, actually.]

Added, medium size. too good to miss, imv, but i’m not as patient as armani who may well do better than me.

happy xmas and more peaceful new year to all.

The other relevant issue on deal pricing, imv, is the aviva bid has not flushed out another bidder. AV share price is lower, but the AV bid seems to be the only game in town for DLG holders at this point, other than waiting a few years for the current DLG managent to gradually redevelop the building.

Although dattttta perhaps isn’t really mac, since he doesn’t yet seem to have declared himself to be the messiah? (… he’s just a naughty boy…)

nobody expects the EUA asset sales all round!

16:57, B1ll: “I’m getting a Scottish vibe from DATTA”

yeah, funny ain’t it. almost like he’s a cousin of mac4671, aka aberdeenman, who has also tended to express some similar political / rac_ist views.

… bit like wazza85 / bobinwilmslow / richard98 / offlersmum often sounds like dim/ikn…

[soz, am afraid it’s just the beer talking tonight, my bad, but on the other hand, i think the beer knows its stuff, frankly.]

If you ever get involved like this on another AIM share, next time round ask the big boys to let you know when they are exiting so you don’t get left behind like this.

i imagine it’s cold out there in the playground with only the dinner ladies to hold your hand.

Mr_w, he never seems that relaxed for someone who made a fortune with deft trading on the way down, does he?

[unlike mac, who i think did seem genuinely quite chilled, presumably as he was simply pocketing a fee to promote the company’s shares, rather than putting his own money on the line. … jmo, of course, but exactly the same behaviour i saw from him when he was posting on ctag as aberdeenman.]

[i know, i know, it’s a little bit off-topic, my apologies, it’s just a little bit of light-hearted ‘let’s take the **** out of putin’ in the festive run-up to xmas. slava ukraini, of course.]

The russkies are getting rather histrionic themselves ….

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/18/dmitry-medvedev-says-editors-of-the-times-are-legitimate-military-targets

“… you represent all that’s wrong with today’s society…”

a tad histrionic, imv (- and perhaps understates the range of complex social problems we all face in the 21st century?).

happy xmas leno, try to chillax a bit.

(as opposed, for instance, to a formal and public administrator’s report into the conduct of the directors and a proper itemisation of what is left in the company and what was withdrawn and when, something which will never be disclosed if it just lapses into bona vacantia without objections to strike-off after gazetting.)

They’ve never given a very convincing explanation for the delay, imo.

RNS of 27th June (yup, 6 months ago), just said:

“… the investments made by the company in the US, which were announced during and post year end, have resulted in a delay to the published timetable and the auditors require additional time to complete their audit.”

c’mon, how hard can it be?! - this is a tiny company, and the US ‘investments’ do not seem especially complex and extensive as to require **half a year extra** (!!) for the auditors to check and agree the company’s accounts. ridiculous, and the resignation of that director associated with the US investments is hardly a positive sign, to put it mildly.

if they just fail to produce accounts, delist, then go for liquidation with bona vacantia, that would avoid proper scrutiny / disclosure about what assets are really left within the company and which pockets the cash ended up in. that might be very convenient for some. jmv.

… one rat has already left the sinking ship …

Hi offer, the old richard98 account has not been cancelled. it’s still live on lse though not been used recently.

admin deleted his ‘bobinwilmslow’ ID because it was a duplicate account, & hopefully they will consider doing the same to this duplicate ‘wazza85’ ID.

(of course, if he asked admin to erase the old richard account, then he could quite legitimately open up a fresh ID, providing it was his only one.)

(presumably, specific and public litigation outcomes, whether good or bad for amit, might be of some interest to his children & their friends, to potential business partners / investors in any future ventures he wants to float, and possibly regulatory authorities in whichever countries he tries to operate in next.)

after all, if amit is convincingly vindicated by the whole legal process & has many, many satisfied investors who end up being very well rewarded, then no doubt he would appreciate the resounding vote of public confidence that would be very widely shared and repeatedly reposted. & i suppose the converse might be possible too, somewhere in the multiverse of possibilities.

Doesn’t look to me like anything significantly has changed about who has been posting. agree with antha, not a lot to be said whilst folks see what happens from the legals.

presumably, once litigation has been conducted, there will then be some specific outcomes about amit and cloudtag which could be very widely publicised, whether or not pis get any money back.

Don’t tell him your name, hopeso!