Member Info for Spikeyj

Crypto, Ian_ (& indeed, anyone else) will not be able to provide you with a shred of evidence that i am connected with jub, for the very simple reason that i am not connected with jub.

it’s just been one of the standard tropes /insults deployed by the ramping crews, as part of their many attempts to deter sceptical posters from posting, and to fool gullible cannon-fodder such as Ian_ into disregarding posters who aren’t ramping EUA.

pretty standard tactics across the AIM chatboards, tbf.

… EUA continues to burn through cash …

“general corporate purposes”

Ian_, was never any RNS that said a buyer was *happy* with their due diligence. EUA claimed that someone who had made a “proposal” had *completed* their due diligence. but no binding offer ever materialised after that … which rather suggests that if someone was ever seriously thinking about making a proper offer for EUA assets, then the results of their due diligence made them realise it was a pretty bad idea.

[analogy: if someone is thinking of buying a house, and then gets a survey *completed*, that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are ‘happy’ with the survey —- a survey might reveal that the house had many faults and is not worth much, in which case the prospective house buyer probably won’t go ahead.]

personally, i rather doubt that there ever was a genuine counterparty who was ever thinking of offering anything other than a nugatory bid. all this chatter about ‘interested parties around a table’ has just been vague waffle used to pump up the share price, allow insiders to dump, and get placings away. jmho.

“Spikeyj you were linked to JUBB Capitol or something in the past”

? by whom, Ian_? … & what made you believe that lie?

seriously fellah, you should stop falling for all the bullsh*t that your ramper friends post on this chatboard.

… seems to be another example of you falling for everything the rampers used to say on this chatboard… if mac, tilly or dim said it, then it must be true, just like the ‘imminent asset sale’ & the ‘massive dividend’, LOL.

Tiger, you might make some money by doing that, but it’s not a risk free trade.

the market is currently pricing in things like (a) possibility that AV. might find something hidden in DLG’s books that makes it withdraw/revise the offer, (b) CMA scuppering, significantly delaying, or imposing costly conditions on the deal, (c) time for deal to complete, (d) chances of widespread market falls &/or specific adverse hit on AV. s/p before the deal goes through, etc.

“So we have Spikeyj still posting on a share he used to short the hell out of…”

you are remarkably gullible, Ian_. who told you that whopper, & what led you to believe it?

There is no point being awarded damages if there are no funds to pay those damages, or if the person(s)/entity against whom damages are awarded is outside a jurisdiction where an award of damages is enforceable.

B1ll, the answer to that one is already well-known —> their mine is loss-making —-> it is mothballed because it costs ‘em more to dig the stuff up than they can sell it for. (hence also, no-one wants to buy it.)

unfortunately pis like Ian_ are not going to learn from EUA’s failure, because of putin’s invasion of ukraine.

i.e.instead of correctly understanding that EUA is a lousy investment simply because it’s a terrible company with poor quality assets that nobody wants to buy for anything other than a pittance, and therefore revising the investment criteria that he drew on to buy into EUA in the first place, Ian_ misattributes EUA’s failure to putin’s war.

that’s a much more comfortable psychological position for folks like Ian_, since it means they don’t have to accept they got it wrong & made bad investment choices, and instead can just blame putin and believe they were merely unlucky … but that means they won’t learnt from their mistakes.

& to celebrate that ian_ is still with us, here’s another EUA rocket.

https://images.app.goo.gl/yndD9NB9WHwdyRQM6

Nice to see some of the old faces popping up again. it helps to indicate which of the rampers forgot to sell when mac & co were exiting.

Ian_, 17:41: “Putin’s actions killed the positivity surrounding this share way back in Feb 2022…”

if Ian_ is simply speaking for himself, perhaps that’s true. but it’s not correct with respect to posting on this chatboard; there continued to be umpteen hundreds of rampy, ultra-upbeat posts about EUA made over the 2.5 years following putin’s invasion of ukraine.

the main rampers then appear to have sold up and sodded off after the suspension this autumn (which was resolved by EUA taking out that payday loan but admitting that imminent asset sales are just a pipedream now).

that’s the point from which the posting volume died the death here, with the ringmasters now absent and only the occasional posts from the suckers who were left holding the baby.

EUA?

[*, *, *, tumbleweed …]

“ … we’ve had our say...”

which doesn’t seem to include much about EUA these days. ? anyone got a good word to say for the poor old thing?

True believers:

MAB, carlito, TBOB, leno, ian_, saint, ?.

(pls feel free to add your names if you’re still in the EUA fan club - if you’re happy and you know it, clap your hands; if you really want to show it, clap your hands …)

… yay, leno & ian to the rescue, the crazy gang are back in town, good times! (even tho’ Ian_ is now ‘no opinion’ rather than ‘strong buy’).

? who’s still left to ramp this one, now that admin have also deleted the bobinwilmslow account?

MAB, saint, TBOB, (? carlito still?), c’mon lads, heee-a-ve!!

… can’t remember which stretch variant was most recently posting, but from a quick glance it looks like that stretch account has also been deleted.

Blimey, I’d almost forgotten the stretch-meister! … blast from the past, eh.

atb.

‘Rac_ist richard’, for the avoidance of doubt.