Member Info for Spikeyj

… that reminds me, i meant to say, ‘******_richard’ [i.e. duplicate id of bobinwilmslow], not ‘roger’, in my 11:53.

my apologies, roger, for lumping you in with that other crowd.

[soz, not really a “binary” when i include a third option of just going bust. ? ‘trinary’?]

I think it partly illustrates just how much of the posting volume was from a relatively small number of very rampy posters, some using multiple IDs.

take mac, ian, tilly, raggsy, ipaynuffin/dim/roger/allhisotherIDs, TBOB, gecko, thechessmaster etc, out of the equation, and that’s probably 85% of all the posts gone.

then subtract another 10% for the various fascist sympathisers who’ve indulged in periodic bouts of gloating about the suffering and death of ukrainians and putin’s glory, and there’s not much left.

EUA mothballed and deeply inactive, near zero meaningful news coming out since they had to take that wonga loan. … so now just waiting for the eventual binary of (a) they sell their assets for a colossal fortune, vs (b) they conduct a deeply discountered placing, vs (c) they can’t manage either (a) or (b) so suspend again and eventually fold.

imv, most likely of those is placing, sometime between mid-jan to mid-march.

POCAs, injunction on asset transfer, cautionary advice / notification of charge, etc. to land registry re beneficial ownership & source of funds, etc? … might be worth running such past cotter if not already done.

31st July 2024: “Notifications will commence today.”

Https://www.thetimes.com/article/d56ee3d2-4bcb-4800-8c61-08a144230cbe?shareToken=83bc4694b74b0757890ec36626488414

Https://www.thetimes.com/article/d56ee3d2-4bcb-4800-8c61-08a144230cbe?shareToken=83bc4694b74b0757890ec36626488414

Weekend coming up, nowt wrong with folks well in profit banking some in this unstable world.

That’s your issue, stonk, not mine.

Deal is fine by me. already comfortably long AV as l/t investment, but added a few more today. (no particular view from me re short-term trade patterns, & perfectly possible of course that they may come a little cheaper this side of xmas.)

Hi crypto, yes, i agree, my earlier post was intended rather tongue in cheek, hence my use of the word “almost”.

06:05 or at least provided the previous dreadful CEOs don’t come back!

Good deal for both DLG & av. well done folks. doubt there will be big pullback with AV, as that’s a pretty sweet price to buy those DLG future prospects. jmo.

08:30, weirdly, almost makes is sound like mac was secretly the dodgy flying duck all along.

Agree with mr_w’s sentiments at 17:26, but more plainly mr stonk is mistaken.

i have indeed ‘explained myself’ (honestly, straightforwardly, consistently ) a fair number of times on this chatboard.

but the thing is, some folks either can’t read, or simply prefer not to believe me. in my book, that’s their problem, not mine.

atb, all honest and polite pis.

11:40, yup.

Re 09:32, recollections may vary, as the late queen said.

i have been consistently sceptical about EUA.

but i’ve mostly kept my posts on topic about the company, its shares, and how they are traded, marketed, pumped, etc, rather than posted loads of off-topic non-share related stuff about trump, starmer, gender politics, conspiracy theories, etc etc.

most of the time, i’ve avoided making personally abusive, foul-mouthed posts about others and lengthy tit-for-tat personal feuds.

i have only ever used one ID on lse, so it would have been easy for anyone to filter me if they didn’t want to read my posts.

i haven’t wished ill, or financial loss, on any ordinary pis, tho’ will happily make a couple of rare exceptions to that for the exceptionally vile datttabbabab & rac_ist richard.

— so i politely disagree with stonk’s assertion.

… speaking of the few people i would very happily laugh at for their losses given their persistent vile, belligerent, abusive, dishonest trolling posts on this board over a sustained period, i note that Iknownuffin/ dimitryreacts has not posted since [four weeks ago / august].

11:07, & how many shares do you believe that wood has?

Or indeed, perhaps matthew could try explaining why it is that engaging with other posters who have a very negative view of EUA should make him feel more confident of EUA’s underlying value, given that he doesn’t believe those other posters know anything meaningful about EUA?