Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
These botnets must be investigated with some urgency.
There were reportedly 700,000 machines or devices liberated from the QAKBOT network.
Good work.
It is not clear how that happened in my opinion based on the available information.
Those devices might need this technology re-purposed a little?
If you are questioning that question, try this one with the comma included.
Those devices might need this technology, re-purposed a little?
The delivery drones could facially recognise the recipient.
It is time to look for new applications for Seeing Machines technology.
I hope to hear of greater innovative ideas before Monday, 9 a.m.
I am not sure how such a delivery device would be viewed by the public.
Plenty of time to win market share in the US market. There is no functional government at present and about a year until the election. I hope for the best regarding road safety generally.
There is no reason not to try and find other applications for this Seeing Machines technology.
I recently encountered one of the delivery drones, small box thing, trying to negotiate some pavement obstacles including me. I wanted to help as it was struggling.
Those devices might need this technology re-purposed a little?
Hope that helps.
Do they mention a lot of factors affecting the global markets at the moment? Do they pick a few and leave other factors out?
I have no time to read it until tomorrow.
I don't see anything on here recently that would lead anyone to believe any reliance on broker ratings helps investment decisions.
Try that logic in reverse. An impregnable cyber security system will help anywhere there is a connected device.
It will help ensure any users will trust the device, whatever that may be.
Cyber security in vehicles will become increasingly important. That is my own logical thinking. There are some articles to support this but IMO it has been obvious for a lomg time. Anywhere there is any kind of connected device there is a need for a security system.
Hope that suggestion helps.
Also Smart Eye (SEYE) claim to be the market leader in Japan.
I am not going to post anything from the SEYE website though, that would not be appropriate.
There was some speculation on this BB recently that Seeing Machines were working with Toyota and Nissan but there is no evidence of this that I can find.
I am looking forward to some information from the company about which manufacturers they are definitely working with.
Yes, I am aware of that.
I am looking forward to an updated list as there has been no news for some time.
NEWKotb, without wishing to offend you, but you did ask the following -
''Who goes back through months of posts replying to a post from way back on 8 Mar 2023 15:30, with the only reply being this mornings SW.... really !!!''
If you have nothing constructive to add to any of my posts or anything relevant to say please don't reply to my posts, you have the same filter option I have.
To answer your query. -
Why are you apparently so concerned? Do you think it is appropriate to ask the above question? I do note it is directed at me as indicated by ''SW ....really !!!'' at the end.
I will include the rest of your post, as follows in my (Internet Pollution)_ other thread if it is appropriate after considering what to do. Some of it fits in that category, you stated -
'' Yep, confirms my suspicions .... Full on AI CHAT BOT as such, I suggest further posts are REPORTED otherwise our BB will get clogged by mindless AI posts. ''
There is no reasonable logic here. How can I be an AI chatbot?
This goes beyond polluting. - Do you think it is appropriate to suggest my further posts are REPORTED?
Would you explain what caused you to have any suspicions that I may be an AI chatbot?
Over to YOU. Please consider your reply carefully.
I think you are intent on disrupting this BB and obviously have no reason to do so.
I will report your posts as appropriate if you do not stop.
It is your choice as it is you who is causing problems.
Thank you for taking part in my research, let us at least try to keep the discussions here civil and not resort to insults.
Please read the rules of posting and if you have any reason to think I am breaking any then please point that out.
We can then have a discussion as to why that may or may not be the case and if necessary involve admin, here on LSE.
Do you think that is fair?
This is part of the development process.
Your comment has been noted and will be considered as and when appropriate.
Internet pollution is a big issue and is explained quite well if you find the original article mentioned in the first post here.
If you have any queries I will try and respond as soon as possible.
I will try and keep any discussion of IPF matters on the Internet Pollution thread but it may spread to other discussion topics where relevant.
I agree with the member who started this thread that I found while looking for something else from around the same time.
So, assuming it is acceptable content and relevant here.
I also think it would be a good thing if Darktrace developed a security system to help protect home users.
This can be analysed without supplying any figures.
Where there is an increase in sales and marketing there is a corresponding increase in sales and therefore revenue.
It looks fine to me.
In order to help the development of my internet pollution filter (device contraption) concept device research development, CDRD for the IPF design project will emerge from this so it is relevant.
Don't allow any details of this research project onto the internet would be my first suggestion.
Hopefully there is some information soon from the company about the manufacturers who are using Seeing Machines technology.
IMO this particular issue, uncertainty, is in some ways magnified on this forum.
We will have a better idea one way or the other soon and there will be no need to speculate.
Copy pasted from original post -
''a coming Goldilocks deployment of not perfect but good autonomous functionality allowing drivers to watch a movie, read a book. The Electric.'' END QUOTE
What is the point of monitoring a driver of any vehicle if they are watching a movie or reading a book?
There will be no need to include a system to monitor the driver at all. This system will mark the beginning of the end of driver monitoring and occupant monitoring.
It is becoming more and more important for Seeing Machines to find other applications for their technology.
There is a good article on Ford being at the limit of what they can offer during the negotiations.
I think the first trace of this news was on Reuters site but it could have started elsewhere. There are other sites covering the same topic and I am not suggesting any particular one is any better or worse.
In my opinion this is bad news. However, I am aware that some members here have previously indicated their view that some news connected to the UAW strikes is good for Seeing Machines.
I cannot see how that could be the case.
There may or may not be an announcement tomorrow, 13th, by the UAW, there has been one on all Fridays during the strikes so far,but this all took an unpredictable turn or two recently.
I am looking for more accurate figures on the stocks of vehicles the BIG 3 have left and which models and assembly plants are affected.
I don't think it is a good idea to post any links to help, IMO, minimize the risk of worsening an already bad situation.
I will try and verify my sources and never knowingly post fake news. There is a lot of that circulating.
I advise visiting only known trusted sites.
There may or may not be an announcement tomorrow, 13th, by the UAW, there has been one on all Fridays during the strikes so far,but this all took an unpredictable turn or two recently.
I am looking for more accurate figures on the stocks of vehicles the BIG 3 have left and which models and assembly plants are affected.
I don't think it is a good idea to post any links to help, IMO, minimize the risk of worsening an already bad situation.
I will try and verify my sources and never knowingly post fake news. There is a lot of that circulating.
I advise visiting only known trusted sites.
The maths looks OK to me but I can add some confusion in the very short term hoping only to explain how cherry-picking certain data points and then making comparisons with old figures could lead to further confusion, that is not my intention.
Cherry-picking is probably incorrect terminology but I mean selecting certain figures and ignoring others during any analysis. So, with that in mind and by intentionally not including any figures, I can present that like this -
The revenue growth figures in parts per 100 look healthy and there has been a small change in the forecasted split for expected revenue to be received during the first and second half, of fy24.
If I spot any problems going forward I will raise them.