Member Info for roses

Just seen that our newest re-incarnation has been banned again ?

"Also on what basis triggers these rises?"

Probably another consolidation

LOL.

Link please ?

Ah yes there isn't one.

Valju- No and i'm sure Valirx are not aware of that rumour either.

Well, finally after a month of asking you have given us a link to someone with that name.

Why has it taken you so long to find it ?

It still doesn't change the fact that there is absolutely nothing to link him with Val

Valintheblood with 46 posts in his first 24 hours since reappearing on the BB with this epic piece of utter nonsense:

"Professor Platt is a guy who is interested in taking VAL over completely. Watch this space"

You couldn't make it up, oh wait He did !

Uncanny - we would all love an explaination on how you think we are "Funded until Autumn"

Considering the the last £1m lasted 12 weeks and this latest placing was for £500k which would suggest 6 weeks !

Your claims that expenditure had halved have been proven wrong for two, yes two placings now and yet you continue to spout the same mantra.

Past performance and behaviour is the most reliable indicator of future behaviour without the absence of new information..

We will be lucky to make spring, let alone Autumn.

" as the ill-informed herd are all blocked"

Uncanny - Surely that should include yourself with claims like "We are funded until Autumn"

That has to be one of the most ill informed posts since the last placing !

Allot of the departments (not all) are still working but without a set payday. they are on monthly pay checks so they haven't gone without pay (yet)

Ok Kane, whatever you say !

As was made clear on the day, the holding declaration was incomplete and poorly filled out, so it was not immediately clear that there was a share reorganisation into direct and indirect holdings.

hope that clears that up for you.

Of course the purchase would have been scrutinised by the relevant bodies that is not the issue.

The issue is that if the BoD are aware of any impending deal, or any shareprice affecting information at all, then they would not have been able to buy shares.

It's pretty black and white, there are no grey areas.

Valintheblood - welcome. Valiseek is approx. 60% owned by Valirx. Are you saying that the majority shareholder is not aware of what is going on in Valiseek and therefore able to circumvent insider trading laws ?

Valju - WOW, you say "Personally, Ive always expected the full amount to be cashed in.... but, with BOD buying more??? As and when allowed"

So in the same sentence you are saying that you always expected to get diluted to oblivion, and as the BOD have bought a token few grand each a couple of weeks ago means they can flagrantly flout insider trading laws by buying because they know a deal is on it's way..

IT is highly illegal what you and a few others are suggesting. If the BOD are under any form of negotiation whatsoever then they would not have been able to buy any shares.

Any casual internet search of any legal site will confirm this. Failing that check out the explicit rules set out on the HMRC website.

14fourteen - You have spent many many months telling everyone to quote facts and contact the company. Yet you have NEVER EVER given one single fact to this BB.

All you have ever given is insults and criticisms (some might think you are lacking in intelligence and facts of your own)

Most of the long termers will remember when the company was asked about the lack of communication and they had the gall to call us all second hand shareholders of no significance, and the only people that mattered were the constant fresh supply of newly suckered in placing sacrifices (sorry investors) and said that the old shareholders had plenty of time to trade the share to make money so they should not be complaining.

Now does that sound like the sort of people you wan't to be doing business with ?

Most people never get any reply from the company unless they are giving and seeking platitudes.

And you wonder why the long termers can't stand the BOD.

Freddy - as usual you are missing the bigger picture !

It's something you really need to pay attention to.

Looks like we are just about to start the next major leg down in world markets.

US markets just starting another freefall and When Apple loses 75 Billion Today you know something serious is just around the corner !

Tin hat time anyone ?

Rightback - Non directors need to notify of all threshold crossings of 3% and above, but directors need to notify of all trades even if they are below 3%

Rightback, Paulie, Freddy - Come on READ the RNS

It states in clear English "Date the threshold was crossed : 2nd January " (YESTERDAY)

Rightback - No, the number of shares held has changed.

Also when your percentage of share held changes as the result of a placing then you do not need to notify the market and if he did, then he would of needed to notify by 27th of december at the latest