Member Info for Rooky

So re duplication. Not ramping. My first post did not appear till I had posted for a second time.

I advise anyone who has not looked at just how big Axis Security Ltd is to do so.

They are one of the big players, with fingers in many security areas, both physical and virtual.

This is a great opportunity for RMS.

I advise anyone who has not looked at Axis Security Ltd, to do so.

Axis is one of the big boys in security, with fingers in many different areas of security, physical as well as virtual.

This will surely open up many opportunities for RMS.

For a roll out of the DMG units, yes. But to expedite research in to other technologies or for general working capital no.

They have to get DMG's out there, before they start spreading their net further.

Extreme E racing, 'AFC Energy EV charger, takes over the grid'.

It would be nice to see AFC in Pole Position.

Stokey,

Exactly my thoughts.

I have never read so many articles over a week-end, regarding both straight battery power and hydrogen via fuel cells.

The main one I read was in the Telegraph which was busting a few battery powered car myths, on the positive side.

Although the article was strong on both power systems, it did slant to the near, mid future as going mainly down the battery route, it also pointed to the advantages of hydrogen power for the more volume forms of transport, ships, trains, busses/coaches and HGV's.

Both technologies are gaining momentum, with the main point given that although there are two camps, it looks more and more that they will/should work together.

Momentum is indeed building, lets hope AFC are carried forward on this momentum and that carry will be justified.

Meant to add, that I have never seen so many articles over a week-end that have mentioned both battery and hydrogen/fuel cell energy use. I especially noticed that the hydrogen route had more prominence than straight through battery power.

The appointment of Allan Vlah as a none exec director, looks to be a very good move.

Apart from his attachments to energy investments, a quick look at his connections as a none exec director to bio mass companies looks good.

These companies are obviously on the look out for companies such as PHE to convert waste into energy.

There is more to this RNS that meets the eye.

Technical s such as charts, showing bottoms (can I still say that) mean very little regarding AIM and companies such as AFC.

To such companies, the SP is very rarely tech chart driven, just because a chart looks good, it is almost 100% driven by news.

Technicals, mean far more when looking at well established companies, with recurring profits/or losses.

No matter what the technicals show regarding AFC, if they had a contract/contracts declared say next Monday for example, the SP would zoom upward, regardless of negative or positive technical figures.

As Bananaman, says

From the fundraiser RNS, the interim results are expected to be announced in the week commencing 20 July 2020.

So if not today or tomorrow, lets hope they are holding it over for a simple reason of wanting it to contain as much good, as yet, unreleased news as possible.

To any thinking of selling any shares, before the weekend, with a possibility of the interims being released on Monday, that would be a hell of a gamble.

Obviously without a crystal ball, we have no idea if the interims will or will not contain such news.

What I do know, is that it will be yet another weekend of waiting and hoping.

You never know.

In a few years, investors in Synairgen, who were recommended to also invest in AFC, might be thanking us in return.

The Synairgen example shows, dreams can come true.

This time next year Rodders

Hi Red Hornet,

Good idea.

I did not receive a reply, but will sent same to the ice cream company (it is a franchise, and has many vans).

The mention of replacing diesel generators took me back just 24 hours to a car boot/antique sale which I attended.

It was a very nice, warm day, with multiple stalls, plus food and drink, almost spoilt by both an ice cream van and a hot dog van, which were both spewing out vast quantities of stinking diesel fumes from their generators.

On arriving back home, I sent an e-mail to the organisers, stating that if they allowed the same to happen again , they would not see me as a customer again.

The same stink, is put out many times by these air polluting generators.

Hi Muscorum,

As Solar panels work by using light as well as heat, and as the Arctic is often snowy, the light can actually be stronger near the arctic circle.

Also the photovoltaic (PV) technology in solar panels is actually able to more efficiently convert sunlight to power when they are colder.

Snow covering, which might occur, is often very quickly dispersed due to the angle of the panels plus the small amount of heat they give off.

Hi Stokey12/Starter.

I fully accept that any mention of PHE directly would be risky, as they have not as yet proven themselves,
but it was the none mention of the DMG technology that was my main point.

As to PHE, I would have at least liked to have seen them being mentioned, in the up and coming, category as to how both green energy production tied to waste management, especially as the main theme of the article was hydrogen

As to yellow, I have no idea what he/she posts as I use the ignore button.

Similar article in Today's Sunday Telegraph.

Really pleased to see the technology of Hydrogen being pushed but also disappointed, in the article.

I was pleased to read that the UK with it's abundance of solar panels plus the multiple wind farms, is well positioned to push out cheap Hydrogen power for both heating homes and businesses as well as the proffered fuel for transport.

The disappointment came when I read that there are only two ways to generate hydrogen.

Blue Hydrogen....made from natural gas, so although not carbon free, it is cleaner than most fuels presently in use.

Green Hydrogen....made by turning surplus energy made by both wind and solar at times of low demand into hydrogen that can be stored and transported.

It then goes on mentioning ITM Power, splitting hydrogen from water along with Baxi, JCB, Intel Energy and Ceres Power, all either innovators in either production or early use.

No mention of the DMG system or Powerhouse Energy, which as we know produces not just Green Hydrogen, but also has the advantage of taking a waste product that is costly to get rid of, whilst turning it into a hydrogen power source. Thereby solving not just one, but two problems.

With China being the main source of battery elements, it makes sense not to have to rely on what is looking more and more like a enemy state, as the article states, it makes no sense to rush down the battery route whilst neglecting the hydrogen route. The two of course can as we know easily live side by side.

The writer of the article is a Daniel Hannan. He is on twitter so if anyone wants to mention anything regarding his article, or comment it's Daniel Hannan on Twitter@DanielJHannan.

Once the name Powerhouse Energy is out there, there will surely be no stopping the reach of the company.

Lets do our bit and reply/comment on every piece we see/hear/read regarding Hydrogen Power, when Powerhouse Energy is not mentioned.

Hopefully not long till any mention of hydrogen production, mentions PHE in the same breath.

PhatStyle4321,

You state, 'The admission of the new shares are going to an institution who cannot sell them I believe till after 1 year'.

Can you tell me where that comment is from, as it's not in any of the purchasing conditions I can see.

AnneOwl,

No problem at all.

A few discussions over the last couple of days that have taught most of us something or/and clarified certain points.

AnneOwl

That was partly my point.

Possible proffering AFC over ABB.