Member Info for Rooky

Thanks for reminding me Stokey, re the web cam.

Thanks CrisPB,

You just beat me to it.

Malachi,

Someone mentioned that PHE had set up a web cam so that progress can be viewed as it happens.

Can't find out how to view or see the camera feed, so might not be set up yet.

Hopefully someone residing nearer the site (I think I recall 2 posters that did live near), could update.

Thanks Rooky.

Good write up Wolves,

To my mind, PHE are at the stage of having opened a shop, and having their technology displayed in the window.

This display is no doubt responsible for an ever increasing interest in that technology, and having only one customer (Protos) having bought the product (understandably), this has resulted in the rest of the potential customers waiting to see how successful the technology is before spending at least 6 figure numbers.

Why jump straight in, when you can wait less than 1 year to see the proven or not full working model, proving itself in the field.

Once it have been shown to work on site100%, which is as good or better than any paper guarantee, I feel that PHE biggest problem will be keeping up with supply.

I give up.

I think things are getting to me, ever since Stumblers 1243 post, I've been trying to work out how many mice would it take to produce sufficient Hydrogen to power the average HGV for 100 miles.

Have a good week-end all.

When a company put out a Regulatory News Announcement, which is headed, 'This is a non-regulatory announcement', all that means is that it did not necessitate such an announcement under the rules.

Like some others, I think it is good that we were informed re the presentation, but unless we get an update, IE insight into the presentation, the RNS release would be like someone allowing you into a darkened room , to see something, then immediately switching the lights off.

But as it was only yesterday, perhaps a bit more patience is required.

Agreed Wolveshaveeyes,

I was looking more to, if these tips had to be removed on a court order, the waste would have to go somewhere, it depends of course on the closeness of a DMG and transport costs.

Ok Thanks, just wondering why it cost you 8,000 shares, but just notice the LoL.

Torreaguas,

Just wondering why your brokers site won't allow you to do a test trade, buy/sell.

The agency ordering the removal was the Environmental Agency obviously not HMRC., apologies.

Agree. Its like most Mediterranean countries, plus third world countries.

Any dip in the land is regarded as a landfill site.

Aside to my last post, some tips that have been closed due to environmental issues, could come into play.

One tip, is just off the M62 about 8 miles west of the Humber Bridge. The company behind the Gilberdyke 'waste mountain' faces £1.7m tax bill, with HMRC taking High court action to force payment.

At one stage, the agency ordered the firm to remove 70,000 cubic metres of waste because of concerns over the amount of rubbish being brought to the site, and that was just the excess amount over the allowed limit.

Can't remember, or find what the cost was estimated to be to remove the contents of this tip, but I 'think' it was in the high 6 figures at least, and possibly over £1 million.

Of course to remove such, would be cheaper if some of the rubbish could be used as feed stock in a DGM, and there must be many councils that are facing an ever increasing disposal of rubbish headache.

Up eer in Yorkshire, we have that saying, 'Where there's muck, there's brass', looking at PHE, that saying is starting to ring very true.

Wolveshaveeyes,

As you say, digging into closed, covered rubbish tips is fraught with danger, apart from the release of gasses, many including a tip near me (not too near thank goodness), was covered over with a sealed type covering, to contain the stink which was the reason for its initial closure.

A comment on all the trucks, going in and out of Protos, plus any other similar sites. What an ideal situation for all these trucks to be Hydrogen powered.

I am in AFC Energy as well as PHE.

I do not usually comment on another share I am invested in on another companies Chat, but I feel it is justified here, (I am not trying to push AFC)

Whilst I am confident of both companies making good, the main difference, apart from time scales is the difference in how both companies treat their shareholders.

PHE are as open as possible, as shown by the recent AGM Q& A, where they look to have answered all question possible in the time allowed, whereas AFC are the proverbial 'treat PI's like mushrooms'.

I know many are invested in both, and will no doubt agree.

PHE, 'a lesson on how to treat PI's with respect, all down to the CEO, with no doubt his teams support'.

Notice De-Nora are presenting at 1050, about 1 hour before AFC.

The bit that is important in order to progress ahead is, 'The presentation will provide an update on membrane performance, scale up, and use cases within the Alkaline Water Electrolyser industry.'

I hope they are referring to the AFC membrane, and not just membranes in general

Surely the update has to be good, otherwise, with everything else that does not make the mark, AFC would try as hard as possible, to let no news, or bad news, fade away, hoping we would not notice.

Wolveshaveeyes,

As you say, some big companies mentioned, and not just a couple.

Also like the idea being taken up re 'on site camera feed' that someone on hear stated they had suggested.

Thanks to all who sent questions in.

Some of these court cases after failed arbitration can take up to 3 years, although I expect due to how far the court case has progressed, from that long ago update, I doubt it will take that long. But it just goes to show how the wheels of civil court justice take.

Hi ItsallBull,

Just been reading the same article, which although still being in the research mode, does look very promising.

I doubt though, it will have any impact on PHE as the technology only appears to work and is aimed at plastics, such plastic bottles and those drink bottles that contain part of Pet plastics.

It has actually been admitted that it does not work on other, mainly none recyclable plastics, so it is more or less, aiming at recyclable plastics, but re-cycling those plastics, in a more efficient way.

It also looks at being more expensive (but I need to do more research on that point).

As PHE only look at plastic feed stock from the none recyclable point, to contaminated plastics, all I feel these new technology will do, is heighten even further the problem plastic waste causes.

If PHE and Peel manage to get at least 50 of the 60/70 plants up and running, at 500,000 plus going to PHE, thats 25 million for a company that has a current market cap of 109 mill.

Even with a low p/e of 10 that would put the market value at 250 mill, so with a more reasonable p/e of 20, that's a cool MC of 500 mill, and that is not of course allowing for the Australian or Spanish possibility of take up.

Of course, there are many other countries that will/should take an interest (if not declared already), surelly the company will generate more and more serious interest.