Member Info for Rooky

Nice to see hydrogen getting a bit of media coverage, but annoyed that only hydrogen from natural gas, and hydrogen from wind power surplus energy, splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen was mentioned, both of course as stated bring their own problems.

Not one mention of hydrogen from waste, which as we know solves problems, with little if any negative effect.

The world will wake up, especially governments),from this blindness to the solution that is waste to hydrogen as energy.

Big7ime,

I presume your joking.

If you are being serious, you obviously have not researched masks that are just plain marks IE, barriers to breath expulsion against masks that are anti viral.

Coincidence!!!!.

When all is signed, I think we can all expect fireworks.

I think that the current tests would have included how long the antiviral layer will work with all the layers proposed.

It would be very poor testing that did not consider the design, number of layers, thicknesses and probably even in differing humiditys.

Hi RegulatorUK,

It is the virus in the moisture that is the main problem and whilst it is accepted that such moisture is always going to be a problem with all none ventilated mask, the big difference will be that any moisture in the P2F mask, will be free of the virus for at least 7 hours.

Therefore any moisture being released into the surrounding area of the wearer will be virus free.

I think the sp is perhaps being held up till all the t's are crossed, the i's doted on the Acquisition of P2F which as we know is expected to be completed on 5 November 2020.

Whilst this is as forgone conclusion as possible, many want such acquisitions as cast iron before jumping in, IE signed sealed and settled.

I expect the sp to push ever higher till then, but hope for an explosion in the price as soon as all is settled.

Jarv55 stated that he thinks 30 million per year is a bit optimistic we don't know the profit or costs yet. which I agree, we don't, but the net profit of £1 per mask surely has to be on the minimum side.

1509 states I thinks we have the medical equivalent of Goretex.

Now wouldn't that be a cash builder.

A week ago the M/Cap of this company was £5 million, at 0810 this morning it was £7 million.

So lets just take the figure of £5 million, because its easier.

At 5 million masks per month, say the company make £1 per mask net profit, over time of course re levelling out the production set up and costs, that would equate to £5 million pounds (I was always good at maths).

So the sp doubling from the 0.55p of a week ago would value the company at £10 million.

With say that £5 million net profit per month, surely even a doubling up of the sp to 1.1p puts the company no where near true value.

The above makes the company look unbelievably under valued, just on the P2F, never mind the other 2 arms of the company, or am I seeing things in the wrong way.

Probably go straight into price monitoring.

Excellent news.

Even if the virus killing masks had not been approved, the purchase of the mask making machine would as we know, result in orders for standard masks, which in itself that would have pushed the sp a bit higher, but as the virus killing masks have been approved this is the best we hoped for.
Also although production will not start till end December, who can doubt that there will be so many orders coming in, they will be impossible to fill.
Next stop, a second production line.

Surely this has to catch full media attention.

Looks like my top up yesterday was, for a change, great timing.

Who says Christmas is cancelled, to me it's come early.

TicoR,

Thanks for that, appreciated.

Anyone know if the exercise of these warrants were triggered by a fixed exercise date, or were they open as to date exercised.

I doubt it was the first, but anyone able to confirm.

Anyone know how many more warrants there are in issue, apologies if been asked/answered before.

Hi Heath23,

That's the problem with dyslexia and spell check, deceased spelt wrong can easily become diseased'

Sort of levels out, dilution, but more cash in the bank, so company worth more.

I Remember reading a couple of months ago that a council was looking at crematoriums being able to cremate bodies, sort of re-cycling them to self power the actual cremation.

Can't remember any more detail, except they were going to conduct a survey as to the probability of upsetting the diseased families.

I also usually read them twice, but due to being exceptionally busy this morning, neglected to do so.

That'll, learn me!

I doubt it, as the sp is looking at the value of P2F, although of course the result of testing the masks can greatly enhance the value to Remote.

Also the price paid via the share deal, looks one of the best buys on the year.

There is no masking where Remote is going with all the latest news, especially the 'read between the lines indicators'.

Sorry about the pun, just couldn't resist.

PrivateRyan,

Missed the bit about commission to Feedback, so my quid pro quo was not exactly correct.

As a coincidence, yet another of the companies in my portfolio has released an RNS re partnering up with another company.

This agreement/deal is on a quid pro quo, so costing neither company any monies, benefitting both companies due to joint increased sales.

Surely Deltex has to look at partnering, or are they bound to stick with the same strategy that is not working.