Member Info for RodneyT

Eloro, 'losing your investment'? Solgold's suitors would love to read those words! :-)

Eloro, the dreadful thing about betrayal is that it is invariably delivered by a friend. Have a good think about that and Solgold. Just supposing this is right, do you plans made in goodfaith would immediately be worthless and that you'd have to trash those and think fast? Do you think you'd buy yourself some time so that you could do the best you could having been 'punched in the face'?

Add, glad you're seeing it more that way. As you know, I believe there is much to happen between now and the end of 2025 at Solgold. News from the field comes first. That is my view.

Not quite, RM, not quite. For example, those broker forecasts were based on a PFS covering 18% of the resource, based on much lower resource prices and placing a token value on assets such as Porvenir and TAM. Well out of date and well short of de-risked NAV of 164p.

MF, No abuse of other members is tolerated in the group. Those are the rules and we all get on very well. DIfferent opinions all the time but we don't have abuse. It is not like here. If we did have abuse, those in question would be asked to leave.

DBW, Game Theory and the Nash Equilibrium explain so much about Solgold in the context of non- binding Friday. Parties want to buy us, JCC has shown its hand first and much acting is going on. Significant news from the company changes everything in an instant. Meanwhile we know more than before about alligances and so on.

Like that one Eloro. :-) Cheers and hope to welcome you as a new member in due course. solgsmallshareholders@gmail.com

Eloro, I can see why you say that now but watch this space! We'll know soon enough. Doom and gloom if the Friday punt falls away is not called for. It makes out company sound like a ship with no power or rudder heading for the rocks. That notion is nonsense.

Eloro, No I haven't but the team is refreshing holdings and has new members joining. It is a friendly group with zero abuse.

Fort, I think you should calm down a bit. You've raced away sounding like a shorter and I'm sure that isn't your intention is it? Based on what you have said, why on earth would 'things get messy' if JCC walk away? The company has clear plans to take TAM to production ,amongst other things. JCC walking away isn't the end of the world! Also, WI, it looks like he isn't even invested. He's a good investment manager but I've referred to one of his howlers already. WI? What price a bag of chips? What happens next at Solgold is what is key following the non-binding punt on Friday.

Fort, You have a right to your opinion of course but there is so much suppostion there all fueled by a non-binding RNS on Friday. If you have sold out here or have shorted it in some way then that is your choice (although you can always buy back in).

I have the share register here from 10 November 2025. No sign of WI or Rousseau there as I mentioned to Eloro a few days ago. So he was out at that stage well before the JCC action. Just supposing he 'knew' something we or the market did not, why wouldn't the Board know something we or the market do not know now?

As I have stated, everything from Friday is non-binding. This is a well funded business that can go it alone. News from the field is overdue and major news will allow the Board different options to those it has now.

We'll see Eloro. Difference of opinion but we'll know soon enough. I guess you hope I'm right?! In any event, I'll acknowledge immediately as when I am shown to be wrong.

Just to be clear Eloro, I would never call WI 'stupid' but none of us get it right all the time and WI has no influence over the next moves of our Board.

All clear, Eloro. We shall see. Major operational news changes everything and what is on the table gives all parties room to change positions.

Don't agree with WI, Eloro. I am sure you know, like the rest of us, he's not always right. E.g. He lost $ 10 million on a duster at COPL back in 2013.

H, They've 'said' they are not interested on a non-binding basis but would, in any event, wish to secure this asset at the lowest price possible. Game theory, Nash Equilibrium, this game has just started. No party has committed to anything based on Friday's RNS.

Great to hear, Add. Some of what is going on reminds me of AGM 2020. NM did a great job for small shareholders back then.. without him, we wouldn't be here chatting about this now.

Fort, there is every reason to give that message. It is non-binding, non-confrontational and buys a little time. Every reason to behave that way. And newsflow? Well businesses are dynamic and the company has its own strategy. Friday was an act. As you know, this is my opinion. For the 4th or 5th time, I will apologise here if I am proved wrong. How about all the 'done dealers' and 'max 28p if we're luckyers'? Will they all apologise as/when they are proved wrong?

OK, Fort, and what do you think will happen if 'the dust does not settle' because we get major, positive news from the company this week? A paradigm shift. What then?

Damers, Thank you for arriving with a truckload of common sense this afternoon!