Member Info for RodneyT

Stack, and that would be funny for you, would it? Did anyone ever explain to you that abuse tells us much more about the abuser than the abused? I note your further abuse directed at DBW. Typically incapable of a reasoned debate. Your opinion about Friday's developments are not facts despite being dressed up as such. Will you apologise here publicly if what you say ends up being wrong? A simple yes or no please.

Whilst I don't agree with you PBOW, I do acknowledge and appreciate what you say and the tone.

Don't think so, P. I think it suited Solgold nicely to avoid unnecessary tension as a result of overreacting to a non binding situation. I believe they have been surprised by something but we will get news soon - this week most likely - that will change things completely. This is a complex situation and not at all straightforward. Again, if I am wrong, I will apologise here. Do we have the same pledge from those who have poured scorn on this view? As and when they are shown to be wrong, will they apologise or will they run away? Which is it please?

Needy, Nothing that was announced on Friday is binding. That is not an opinion it is a fact. This means that all parties can smoothy change their positions whenever they wish to do so. My opnion is that major news will be announced soon by the Company which will immediately lead to changes in positions. A game is being played. This is the start not the end. If I am wrong, I will apologise here.

Stack

'One of those thickos', 'screwed of not'. Are you able to communicate with others without being so abrasive and abusive? What sort of life do you lead? You have your opinion to offer on this. But it is not fact however much you huff and puff. You cannot speak or act on behalf of the company either. I state again Stack, I will apologise if I am wrong. Will you?

Neddy, I am fully aware of what I am saying. Friday was a Pantomime act and started the real game. Major news expected from the company very soon. If I am wrong, I will apologise. The above is my stated opinion. It is not fact. One fact is that all of Friday's RNS was non binding. So why be so forceful about it? It was nothing.

Stack, opinion dressed up as fact. Let's see what this week brings. I shall apologise here if I am wrong. Will you? Will you Stack? Is humility part of 'having an agenda' in your value set?

Calm yourself please, Ort. So much more to be revealed here. Friday was a mere game and posturing, nothing more. The Company is fully able to defend itself and it will. All of the positions taken and the words chosen to be used indicated a game on Friday. A projection and nothing more. Calm.

Mont, Because 'minded' is utterly non binding which was precisely what they wanted to convey....but in a more diplomatic way. Part of a game, that's all.

Add, this is not over by a long chalk and I sense our Board have been badly 'let down /betrayed'and will be on top form as a result.

Has he ever acknowledged his total misread? And has he publicly apologised to all those who were frightened by his advice and either sold in the 6's and 7's or didn't buy down there hoping to buy at 5? Oh, instead of being open and honest, wasn't the reply' everyone's got an agenda here'. They have indeed and the vast majority have a principle agenda of telling the truth and not disrespecting fellow shareholders.

Https://thehill.com/opinion/international/5642398-venezuela-minerals-us-strategy/

We are not done just yet with this non binding situation. Pity that Perry Holloway is no longer with Sologold. Ex US Ambassador to Guyana. Pretty sure he still has options/shares though and he is certainly on LinkedIn.

Don't agree with most of that Fort, sorry. We'll soon know much more though so we'll see.

BHP don't have to support a JCC 28p bid for sure. They specifically said 'non binding'. The others haven't committed either... they can't agree to an offer that wasn't made. Only a statement of intent.

Go back to 1753 med. Applies to all of them in my view. Just games.

All plausible Add. Noboa needs to be careful with his messaging to the US though. Being 'nasty' to The Donster would not be wise . I am sure something 'odd'has happened so that today's message was released but, as I say, there is nothing solid here so major news allows a total reshuffle without issue.

Eloro, I revert to my 'fake Rolex' remark. With BHP in particular, they went out of their way to state 'non-binding' agreement to a deal that itself is non-binding! Games afoot Eloro. Look at my comments on Noront from earlier. Just posturing today. That's my view. All parties can change anything they like - particularly if a paradigm shift news update appears.

1753 - you'll see my view about NM.

Have done so during the day med. This is a game and today was posturing. There is nothing binding and the parties can credibly change their positions whenever they wish and particularly as and when field news arrives. Nothing new with this. Game theory. It was all non-binding for a reason. JCC's 'majority' can disappear in an instant.

Covered that earlier M.