RE: wood6 Apr 2023 00:12
Very good points indeed.
But that is just the wind farms.
It is only a fraction of the energy transition. O&G needs to decarbonise their own operations. We still need to provide fuel for aviation, industry, marine vessels and carbon capture a non starter on those. Which fuel we use is up for grabs, but it won't be batteries or Uranium that's for sure!
Who has the petrochem skills, transport of chemicals, exosive gasses etc.
There is a transition starting now and Wood have fingers in a lot of those pies. CC(S), hydrogen, the two bases for synfuels., pipelines, high pressures, maybe offshore stuff.
The bottom line is energy costs will go up. Actually pricing in the pollution and our depletion of finite resources (including your big C) will cost money. Existing commercial models must change.
But the transition needs skilled engineers working under tried and tested, robust management systems, tools and controls to do this well and safely.
Who is better placed to do so?
Don't punish those LTHs and sell. Refocus and prosper.
I sold some hoping for a no deal but kept a stake to acknowlwdge the fact they might accept.
Would I buy here. Probably. If they sell, quick buck. If they don't, drop as happy and pals retreat and we see slow recovery from a company Apollo reckoned there was a healthy profit on at 240, so take from that what you will.
I am no expert, just airing my ow reasoning to further the discussion.
Don't gamble money you can't afford or listen to the people on here for investment advice for a billion reasons!