RE: Retail Sellers Are Missing A Trick24 Apr 2026 11:28
Have AET confirmed 7 liftings per annum? The model assumes four: Jan. April. July. Sept. Assumed the additional barrels just get added to existing liftings, not net new liftings? In any event at 80p, much of these is already baked into the SP? The strategic review is the key for me and it works to my mind like an option: it decays over time.
ASSUMPTION: Bid offer: 150p. SP moves from 80p to 150p (88% upside). No bid: SP moves from 80p to 60p (25% downside)
DOWNSIDE SCENARIO: AET drifts back to 60p. Loss from 80p = β (25%)
UPSIDE SCENARIOS
Three (there are more but not tested) plausible bid outcomes:
Bid Price Upside from 80p
120p +50%
135p +69%
150p +88%
EXPECTED VALUE (EV)
Case A: Conservative probability (20%)
Bid EV
120p (20% Γ 50%) β (80% Γ 25%) = β (10%)
135p (20% Γ 69%) β (80% Γ 25%) = β (3%)
150p (20% Γ 88%) β (80% Γ 25%) = + (3%)
At 20%, only a high price bid makes holding worthwhile
Case B: Central probability (25%)
Bid EV
120p β1%
135p +6%
150p +11%
At 25%, holding is clearly rational unless you think bids top out nearer 120p.
Case C: Optimistic but plausible (30%)
Bid EV
120p +5%
135p +13%
150p +19%
At 30%, holding is strongly EV positive
FULLY RECONCILED BIG PICTURE:
β’ Fundamentals alone β 70β85p fair
β’ Oil at $100 (not locked in) β marginal near term help
β’ Strategic review β a real but decaying option
β’ Successful bid at ~150p β plausible, not fantasy
β’ Probability required to justify holding β ~23β25%
The logic holds if and only if:
β’ a bid is β₯25% likely, and
β’ a credible bid lands β₯135β150p, not 115β120p, and
β’ willing to re evaluate on a time basis, not wait indefinitely
In that framework, holding now is rational, blindly holding forever is not
HOLD WHILE:
β’ strategic review is active
β’ no negative operational shock
β’ price does not overshoot materially beyond 85β90p without news
REASSESS IF:
β’ No strategic update by early summer
β’ Share price rallies on oil alone (not corporate news)
EXIT IF:
β’ Review quietly fades and price is still pricing in upside
β’ Or upside compresses without new catalysts
If we amend to 125p bid at 20% probability and no bid = SP drifts to 55p, the picture changes: 56% payoff if bid occurs. -31% if no bid. The upshot is to hold, purely on EV grounds, requires a 35% to 40% probability of a 125 bid. That is a sobering thought!