RE: LFD's12 Jan 2022 07:55
Given the amount of praise heaped on Mologic at the time, they appeared to be the saviours that moved us in to a good position for the new version after hamburgergate and the dribble version was shelved. The lack of information in the RNS is more than irritating. What’s the plan, who are we working with, what are the timescales and what are the risks? There will be future mutations, they need ideally to make full use of affimers and their adaptability to future proof the platform, shirley. However the discussion (no facts from the company to help) suggests that antibodies were the secret Mologic sauce. Where does this leave us? PAHs suggestion of a redesign rather than a tweak may or may not be necessary. If it is, where would that leave us timescale wise, regarding approvals and as I said yesterday would it be complete just in time for the next issue to emerge - the pace of development isn’t keeping up unfortunately. It’s all well and good WaffAl talking about the long term opportunity for the LFD, but if they’re continually chasing their tails rather than commercialising a product they’re just wasting cash.