RE: RE: H1: trial unit will be provided to Volvo.14 Jun 2022 14:36
Observer:
Thanks for your efforts on your assessment of the benefits of the Inspirit Stirling to Volvo. It makes a change to have something of worth to read.
I have said in previous posts that a marine application is a great niche application for a Stirling. The availability of large amounts of continuous quality heat is ideal.
Whilst the paper you cite indicates what energy is theoretically available and what could be achieved from large diesels, that doesn’t mean that’s what you can actually produce from In-Spirits Stirling. In-Spirits Stirling is rated at 6.4 kW allegedly, and perhaps this could be improved slightly by the addition of more heat but as more and more heat goes in then reliability begins to decrease.
Again, as I have said before to make use of the D13 undoubted large amounts of waste heat requires a redesign. You cannot simply pump in more and more heat. The down side to more output is the weight and cost rises.
The 26 April 2019 RNS which announced “Currently in discussion with a large car/marine engine manufacturer to develop a unit for the shipping industry with current o/p of 11.68 kW”
This I believe is an erroneous statement probably resulting from a copy and paste error, it’s nonsensical. There has been no further reference to this figure. Also In-Spirits later statements state the Charger technology is already 65% compatible with the marine application indicates that they would be using the 6.4 kW Stirling design. As they put it, it will save development time. Surely this indicates another design is not in the making. Again another example of In-Spirit being unable to keep their story consistent.
1. Is 11.68 kW meant to be thermal or electrical ?
2. How can a unit that is yet to be developed have an output of 11.68 kW, as you said a very specific figure! You might say approximately 12 kW or the aim is to have an output of …
3. Is it meant to say the current (Amps) of this unit will be 11.68 A – very unlikely.
4. It seems more likely that part of a sentence has been deleted to leave this nonsensical potion.
5. It could relate to the thermal output of the Stirling. Assume 90% efficiency hence 18 kW goes into the Charger/Stirling to produce 6.4 kWe and therefore 11.6 kWt. The efficiency figure I’m sure has varied from 90 to 92%
The whole In-Spirit story is riddled with amateurism at all levels. There are too many holes and inconsistencies for long term investors to have any faith, the passage of time corroborates this. If memory serves, the last time we had a discussion the conclusion was it is difficult to come to any decent estimations due to the ambiguities and vagueness of the In-Spirit information or lack of it and so it remains.
At the end of the day John Gunn has not brought a single product to market in more than a decade of waffling on about doing so.