Member Info for pduk

Nonsense. Civil (corporate) Litigation would be directed at James Parsons or the directors of the company. Your stance that he should be allowed to get away with it, if there was evidence (which there is not), for the greater good is appalling. Only a few weeks ago you was forecasting the same ol' oversight / governance here. What has changed? You bought in? Many, many, people, I would say the majority, have lost huge sums of money here - frankly not to see it again. Why mot allow them that justice? However, as I said before, there is no evidence, so feel rest assured that James Parsons and the others will and have sailed off into the sunset.

I'm not protesting, I'm just calling you out as a bullsh*tter. Now you're accusing me of being someone else because you have failed to mislead when challenged. Your fake '[Link Removed]' string still makes me laugh. Diverting the attention to Crudehope and Exploration isn't going to work either. Face it, you have no evidence in any shape or form and are merely. Man up like the rest of us and accept your losses.

Good God!! Are you seriously trying to fool us all with you fake '[Link Removed]' string?

He is too slippery / cunning to fall so hard because of a schoolboy text or piece of paper work. You have no proof. Nor does Trellis. You do have a wild imagination. If you have something of substance then put it up for all to see. Otherwise change the subject or move on.

You will need to add Soundboy to that register as well. All part of the TE-7 boys on tour who all had JP's mobile number. Nothing can be done and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise.

All talk and no trousers, Watergate. I will believe it when I see it. The previous BoD played a blinder and enriched themselves and a few P.I's. Nothing can be done about it (Tellis /SAG) but we can collectively hope for the best moving forward.

If I recall correctly, Crudehope towards the beginning of this year admitted to knowing Exploration, which surprised me.

http://www.theel1tetrader.com/2012/09/sound-oil-not-so-sound-after-all.html - From 2012. Why does it read as though history is repeating itself? Didn't someone here compare it to 'Cove' as well?

The way 'back machine' doesn't work like that, CrystalBallBroke. It is not instantaneous or a certainty. The web is an extremely large place.

The moderators here are just reacting to requests as per their jobs. They're not the catalyst.

She DOES mention Sound Energy on her LinkedIn profile, Daveyboy71

Has Pontcanna been removed because of his last post? If you click on his profile it says he has never posted.

You're still trying to mislead people, Sharetrader123

"pduk I was more thinking about the facts you have left out such as when Graham states that the bond could be paid off with the money that they would be generating."

As pointed out to you by myself and various other people several other times now, if the 20 Million bond is due MARCH 2021 but we are, at the very best case, generating cash by DEC 2021, how do you propose we service that debt?

Graham may say many things, just like James Parsons, rather like his no dilution statement but talk is cheap. I , maybe like others, have nothing to go by in order to trust him.

I'd suggest you do some actual research on this company instead of waffling rubbish to others in order to 'sharetrade'123

Oh, you missed responding to ps200306 post to you

"Would you care to enumerate the positive actions, ST123, or did you really mean "positive utterances"? In Graham's recent video appearances he has said that the following are the crucial things to haul SOU off the rocks -- sort out the bond, raise the finance for LNG and find a contractor to deliver it, complete a gas sales agreement."

As before, be postive, by more shares but lets not try and kid people who have been screwed over here already.

Sorry to disappoint you, Sharetrader123 but that pin point commentary wasn't delivered by me but by ps200306, unless you're still spewing at my comment to you some 6hours ago. Take a deep breath! All I ask is that you appreciate peoples experiences and journeys whilst not sprouting false information. Have a lovely evening and weekend.

Come on Trellis. That just sounds like you're laying bread crumbs and enticing people to join SAG. From afar I have admired your proactive stance to set the group up and help others but to do date what has it achieved. I very much doubt there is any criminal activity. As much as James Parsons and co are shady they wouldn't leave anything to chance.

As someone pointed out before, restructuring could be an option and that is what Lyon is probably hoping but on the flip side why would they agree to that when they could the whole company themselves.

Sharetrader123, who are you to criticise anyone here? Many, many have been here for years and have had their life savings taken from them after James Parsons (before he did a runner form such a good thing) ramped this to high heaven whilst taking them to one side and shaking their hands when not standing at a podium. You, in your own admission, have only invested in the last couple of months so do not share that history or anger. You maybe a 'ShareTrader'123 but the majority here are long term investors

It was at the start of that period that you was found to be begging on this board for SOU information as you couldn't be bothered to harvest the information yourself from reading RNS's.

It is not just your fat fingers lying but you keep repeating that we are funded to LNG. We are NOT. The funding we have maybe takes us to March 2021. LNG, at best case is, Dec 2021. In between that we need to repay the 20million bond. Here is pS200306 reminded you of that~~~~

**There's a few alternative *facts* in there too, ST123. We would have had funds to March next year if the PI offering had been fully subscribed. It wasn't, but even if it was, March is a long way short of end of 2021 which is the earliest possible first LNG revenue -- and sounds optimistic at that. We don't have a multi trillion c ft asset. We have 47% (currently) x 0.377 Tcf = 0.177 Tcf of a 2C resource. Regardless of what it's worth, why would the bondholders accept restructuring if they could have the whole company themselves ... or at least extract their pound of flesh with additional onerous terms. Meanwhile we've given away 20% just to keep the lights on to the end of *this* year. Even if we make it to first gas, shareholders may have been diluted out of existence. Not saying it will happen, just that there is a flip side to your unbridled optimism.***

According to many here, Graham Lyon told us that dilution wouldn't happen. It did. Thus far he has told us all what he is going to do (rather like James Parsons) but unfortunately until something is signed and delivered I will take things with a pinch of salt.

Be positive. Great! But don't mislead in order to 'ShareTrade'123

I don't think sharetrader123 is Sarah Dees. Unless it is a ploy to throw us off the scent, Sarah Dees wouldn't make such amateur mistakes. I always found her in e-mail and in person to be of high intelligence and integrity.

What are you suggesting Trellis?

"Further Debt but do not expect further dilution" - we have allegedly heard that before and look what happened

Levelup, if that is the case for James Parsons, then I am thrilled that Echo holders have some integrity to vote him out. That will hurt him.

Hope you're well, Daveyboy. Glad to see you still posting.

I wonder how much that cost?

Here's another one conducted by the same people

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR09qTi6d5Y

Hope you're well, Daveyboy. Glad to see you still posting.

I wonder how much that cost?

Here's another one conducted by the same people

youtube.com/watch?v=kR09qTi6d5Y

To quote Trellis:-
"AG conference call with Mr Lyon and Mr Seghiri on 20/04/2020, direct quote:Graham confirmed that they are not going to issue more share to finance the company, he said he has a good experience at doing that.
He will basically try with trade finance, credit lines and government help/finance. This was repeated in the shareholder q and a soon after" This was agreed by many here. If untrue then it has serious libel repercussions. the fact it was put here and wasn't removed speaks volumes.

"We" - As I said, speak for yourself.

In regards to you stating that we have enough cash to take us to LNG. We don't. This has been pointed out to you before but yet you continue to mislead. SOU have enough cash to take them to March. LNG, at best case, will come online towards the end of the year. I appreciate your positive attitude but many of us have been here for years, lost serious amounts of money and have been lied to.

We don't need people like you spouting Hare Krishna vibes.

Speak for yourself, Sharetrader123. Judging by the comments aimed at at you over the past few hours I'd suggest you do a bit more research into Sound Energy Plc before making any further wild speculations. Early days for Graham but he has already lied about dilution.

"Tendrara could be the drill that saves us." Tell that to TE-8, TE-9 and TE-10

People don't want to talk about the past but yet applaud the pitiful 600,000 which IS due to be returned from that era of lavish spending. Badile cost us close to 25million!!!